Skip to main content

The Shadow Rating Approach — Experience from Banking Practice

  • Chapter
The Basel II Risk Parameters

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altman E, Rijken H (2004), How Rating Agencies achieve Rating Stability, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2004, vol. 28, issue 11, pp. 2679–2714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammer J, Packer F (2000), How Consistent Are Credit Ratings? A Geographic and Sectoral Analysis of Default Risk, FRB International Finance Discussion Paper No. 668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appasamy B, Hengstmann S, Stapper G, Schark E (2004), Validation of Rating Models, Wilmott magazine, May 2004, pp. 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2005), Validation of low-default portfolios in the Basel II Framework, Basel Committee Newsletter No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2004), International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2000), Range of Practice in Banks’ Internal Ratings Systems, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor R, Falkenstein E (2001), Testing for Rating Consistency in Annual Default Rates, Moody’s Investors Service, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor R (2004), Measuring the Quality and Consistency of Corporate Ratings across Regions, Moody’s Investors Service, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly L (1992), Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits, Computers in biology and medicine 22(5), pp. 351–361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davison A, Hinkley D (1997), Bootstrap Methods and their Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (2003), Validierungsansätze für interne Ratingsysteme, Monatsbericht September 2003, pp. 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlenmaier U (2001), Models of Joint Defaults in Credit Risk Management: An Assessment, University of Heidelberg Working Paper No. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch (2005), Fitch Ratings Global Corporate Finance 2004 Transition and Default Study. Fitch Ratings Credit Market Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch (2006), Fitch Ratings Definitions. http://www.fitchratings.com/corporate/fitchResources.cfm?detail=1 [as at 18/02/06]

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene W (2003), Econometric Analysis, Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttler A (2004), Using a Bootstrap Approach to Rate the Raters, Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 19, pp. 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitfield E (2004), Rating System Dynamics and Bank-Reported Default Probabilities under the New Basel Capital Accord, Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking R (1976), The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression, Biometrics, 32, pp. 1–50.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Judge G, Griffiths W, Hill R, Lee T (1980), The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Limpert E, Stahl W, Abbt M (2001), Lognormal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues, BioScience, 51(5), pp. 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löffler G (2004), An Anatomy of Rating Through the Cycle, Journal of Banking and Finance 28(3), pp. 695–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s (2004), Moody’s Rating Symbols & Definitions. Moody’s Investors Service, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s (2005), Default and Recovery Rates of Corporate Bond Issuers, 1920–2004, Special Comment, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuermann T, Hanson S (2004), Estimating Probabilities of Default, FRB of New York Staff Report No. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s (2002), S&P Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings Definitions. http://www2.standardandpoors.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=sp/Page/FixedIncome RatingsCriteriaPg&r=1&l=EN&b=2=21&ig=1&ft=26 [as at 18/02/06]

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s (2005), Annual Global Corporate Default Study: Corporate Defaults Poised to Rise in 2005, Global Fixed Income Research, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erlenmaier, U. (2006). The Shadow Rating Approach — Experience from Banking Practice. In: Engelmann, B., Rauhmeier, R. (eds) The Basel II Risk Parameters. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33087-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics