Skip to main content

Portfolio Management of R&D Collaborations in Mobile Commerce

  • Chapter
Managing Dynamic Networks

Abstract

Many companies in the cross section of telecommunication and mobile technology engage in R&D collaborations to manage uncertainty, create synergies and learn. While the challenges of managing individual collaborations are well documented, little is known on how to systematically manage several R&D collaborations simultaneously. We use modern portfolio theory as an analogy to show how companies active in mobile telecommunication manage risks and create synergies by simultaneously engaging in several inter-firm collaborations.

We gratefully acknowledge research funding of the Mobiconomy project at Copenhagen Business School.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anand, B., and Khanna, T., 2000, Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, Strategic Management Journal. 21(3):295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancarani, F., and Shankar, V., 2003, Symbian: Customer interaction through collaboration and competition in a convergent industry, Journal of Interactive Marketing. 17(1):56–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., and Tushman, M., 1990, Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technology Change, Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(4):604–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., and Tushman, M., 2001, Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity, Industrial and Corporate Change. 10(3):675–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booz, Allen and Hamilton, 2000, The allianced enterprise: breakout strategy for the new millennium, Fifth in a series of viewpoints on alliances, Online publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group, 2002, The Promise of Mobile Telecom: An Interview with Keiji Tachikawa, CEO of NTT DoCoMo, Technology and Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A., 1990, Scale and scope-the dynamics of industrial capitalism, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Computer Dealer News (24.10.2003); HP and Disney forge an IT development deal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A., and Brady, T., 1998, Policies for a complex product system, Futures. 30(4):293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Man, A., and Duysters, G., 2002, Navigating the network economy: positions, roles & tactics, presentation by the centre for global corporate positioning (cgcpmaps.com) at the ASAP Summit Chicago, March 11–13, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., 1996, The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes?, Strategic Management Journal. 17(Summer Special Issue):55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., and Hamel, G., 1996, The use of strategic alliances in implementing technology strategies, INSEAD Working paper 95/22/SM, pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., and Nobeoka, K., 2000, Creating and managing a high-performance knowledgesharing network: the Toyota case, Strategic Management Journal. 21(3):345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., and Singh, H., 1998, The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review. 23(4):660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist (18.07.2002); The telecom crisis: Too many debts; too few calls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E., and Gruber, M., 1997, Modern Portfolio Theory, 1950 to date, Journal of Banking and Finance. 21:1743–1759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J., and Methe, D., 2001, Market-and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: The case of mobile communication, Research Policy. 30(4):589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., 1993, Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences, Strategic Management Journal. 14(5):371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., 1991, Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal. 12(Summer Special Issue):83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, J., and Pekar, P., 1998, Smart Alliances — A Strategy & Business Book, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A., and Beamish, P., 1997, Knowledge, bargaining power and international joint venture instability, Academy of Management Review. 22(1):177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, D., Hitt, M., and Vaidyanath, 2002, Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management. 28(3):413–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Dyer, J., and Singh, H., 2001, Value creation and success in strategic alliances: Alliancing skills and the role of alliance structure and systems, European Management Journal. 19(5):463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M., and Shapiro, C., 1985, Network externalities, competition and compatibility, American Economic Review: 75(3):424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M., and Chatterjee, S., 1994, Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?, Academy of Management Journal. 37(1):109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhija, M., and Ganesh, U., 1997, The relationship between control and partner learning in learning-related joint ventures, Organization Science. 8(5):508–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H., 1952, Portfolio selection, Journal of Finance. 7(3):77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey, 2002, Managing an alliance portfolio, The McKinsey Quarterly. 2002(3):28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D., Oxley, J., and Silverman, B., 1996, Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal. 17(Winter Special Issue):77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J., 1997, Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 13(2):387–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., and Zenger, T., 2002, Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?, Strategic Management Journal. 23(8):707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., 1980, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters (08.02.2002); NTT DoCoMo says seeking systems integration partner, time posted: 10:01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters (29.01.2001); Japan’s DoCoMo, Sony to extend alliance overseas, time posted: 08:53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B., 1972, The organization of industry, Economic Journal. 82(327):883–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P., and Van de Ven, A., 1992, Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, Strategic Management Journal. 13(7):483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P., and Van de Ven, A., 1994, Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships, Academy of Management Review. 19(1):90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W., 1963, A simplified model of portfolio analysis, Management Science. 9(2):277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W., 1970, Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdson, J., 2004, The Sony Ercisson Endeavour Part 1, Working Paper, April 7 2004, Stockholm School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., 1992, Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 18:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., 1996, Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 31(2):193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., and Anderson, P., 1986, Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly. 31(3):439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mahnke, V., Overby, M.L., Nielsen, L.E. (2006). Portfolio Management of R&D Collaborations in Mobile Commerce. In: Klein, S., Poulymenakou, A. (eds) Managing Dynamic Networks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32884-X_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics