Computation of Aerodynamic Coefficients for Transport Aircraft with MEGAFLOW

  • Mark Rakowitz
  • Sascha Heinrich
  • Andreas Krumbein
  • Bernhard Eisfeld
  • Mark Sutcliffe
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (NNFM) book series (NNFM, volume 89)


The accuracy of the DLR structured and unstructured computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes in predicting aircraft forces and moments on several configurations at low and high Mach and Reynolds numbers is investigated. Using a combination of a high quality grid, i.e. a grid with sufficient resolution of important flow features, low levels of artificial dissipation and advanced turbulence models, the structured code (FLOWer) is able to both qualitatively and quantitatively predict the experimentally measured drag, lift, pitching moment and pressure distribution. Compared to the structured methods the total time for grid generation is significantly reduced with the unstructured approach (TAU). The quality of the flow solution is comparable to the structured method at significantly higher computational costs.


Computational Fluid Dynamic Grid Generation Pitching Moment Wing Shape Maximum Lift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. Kroll, C.-C. Rossow, K. Becker and F. Thiele: “MEGAFLOW — A Numerical Flow Simulation System”, 21st ICAS Congress, Melbourne, paper 98-2.7.4, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Kroll, R. Radespiel and C.-C. Rossow: “Accurate and Efficient Flow Solvers for 3D Applications on Structured Meshes”, AGARD R-807, 1995, pp.4.1–4.59.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Gerhold, O. Friedrich, J. Evans and M. Galle: “Calculation of Complex Three-Dimensional Configurations Employing the DLR TAU-Code”, AIAA Paper 97-0167, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Brodersen, M. Hepperle, A. Ronzheimer, C.-C. Rossow and B. Schöning: “The Parametric Grid Generation System MegaCads”, 5th Intern. Conference on Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Related Fields, edited by B. K. Soni, J. F. Thompson, J. Häuser and P. Eisenmann, 1996, pp. 353–362.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D._C. Wilcox: “Turbulence Modeling for CFD”, DCW Industries Inc., La Cañada, CA, 1993, pp. 84–87.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Monsen, M. Franke, T. Rung, P. Aumann and A. Ronzheimer: “Assessment of Advanced Transport-Equation Turbulence Models for Aircraft Aerodynamic Performance Prediction”, AIAA Paper 99-3701, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Jameson, W. Schmidt and E. Turkel: “Numerical Solutions of the Euler Equations by Finite-Volume Methods using Runge-Kutta Time-Stepping Schemes”, AIAA Paper 81-1259, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Martinelli and A. Jameson: “Validation of a Multigrid Method for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equation”, AIAA Paper 88-0414, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.R. Spalart and S.R. Allmaras: “A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows”, AIAA Paper 92-0439, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.R Edwards and S. Chandra: “Comparison of Eddy Viscosity-Transport Turbulence Models for Three-Dimensional, Shock-Separated Flows”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 756–763.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Monsen and R. Rudnik: “Investigation of the Blunt Trailing Edge Problem for Supercritical Airfoils”, AIAA Paper 95-0089, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Rakowitz, B. Eisfeld, D. Schwamborn and M. Sutcliffe: “Structured and Unstructured Computations on the DLR-F4 Wing-Body Geometry”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 40, No. 2, March–April 2003, pp. 256–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Rakowitz
    • 1
  • Sascha Heinrich
    • 1
  • Andreas Krumbein
    • 1
  • Bernhard Eisfeld
    • 1
  • Mark Sutcliffe
    • 2
  1. 1.DLRInstitute of Aerodynamics and Flow TechnologyBraunschweig
  2. 2.Airbus Deutschland GmbHBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations