Abstract
Existing search engines—with Google at the top—have many remarkable capabilities; but what is not among them is deduction capability—the capability to synthesize an answer to a query from bodies of information which reside in various parts of the knowledge base. In recent years, impressive progress has been made in enhancing performance of search engines through the use of methods based on bivalent logic and bivalent-logic-based probability theory. But can such methods be used to add nontrivial deduction capability to search engines, that is, to upgrade search engines to question-answering systems? A view which is articulated in this note is that the answer is “No.” The problem is rooted in the nature of world knowledge, the kind of knowledge that humans acquire through experience and education.
It is widely recognized that world knowledge plays an essential role in assessment of relevance, summarization, search and deduction. But a basic issue which is not addressed is that much of world knowledge is perception-based, e.g., “it is hard to find parking in Paris,” “most professors are not rich,” and “it is unlikely to rain in midsummer in San Francisco.” The problem is that (a) perception-based information is intrinsically fuzzy; and (b) bivalent logic is intrinsically unsuited to deal with fuzziness and partial truth.
To come to grips with the fuzziness of world knowledge, new tools are needed. The principal new tool—a tool which is briefly described in their note—is Precisiated Natural Language (PNL). PNL is based on fuzzy logic and has the capability to deal with partiality of certainty, partiality of possibility and partiality of truth. These are the capabilities that are needed to be able to draw on world knowledge for assessment of relevance, and for summarization, search and deduction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arjona, J.; Corchuelo, R.; Pena, J. and Ruiz, D. 2003. Coping with Web Knowledge. Advances in Web Intelligence. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 165–178.
Bargiela, A. and Pedrycz, W. 2003. Granular Computing—An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, Dordrecht, London.
Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American.
Chen, P.P. 1983. Entity-Relationship Approach to Information Modeling and Analysis. North Holland.
Craven, M; DiPasquo, D.; Freitag, D.; McCallum, A.; Mitchell, T.; Nigam, K. and Slattery, S. 2000. Learning to Construct Knowledge Bases from the World Wide Web. Artificial Intelligence 118(1–2): 69–113.
Cresswell, M. J. 1973. Logic and Languages. London, U.K.: Methuen.
Gamat, T. F. 1996. Language, Logic and Linguistics. University of Chicago Press.
Lenat, D. B. 1995. cyc: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure. Communications of the ACM 38(11): 32–38.
Novak, V. and Perfilieva, I., eds. 2000. Discovering the World with Fuzzy Logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Heidelberg New York: Physica-Verlag.
Pawlak, Z. 1991. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Pedrycz, W., and Gomide, F. 1998. Introduction to Fuzzy Sets. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Smith, B. and Welty, C. 2002. What is Ontology? Ontology: Towards a new synthesis. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems.
Smith, M. K.; Welty, C; McGuinness, D., eds. 2003. OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C Working Draft 31.
Sowa, J. F., in Albertazzi, L. 1999. Ontological Categories. Shapes of Forms: From Gestalt Psychology and Phenomenology to Ontology and Mathematics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 307–340.
Zadeh, L.A. 2001. A New Direction in AI—Toward a Computational Theory of Perceptions. AI Magazine 22(1): 73–84.
Zadeh, L.A. 1999. From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words—From Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 45(1): 105–119.
Zadeh, L.A. 1994. Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, and Soft Computing, Communications of the ACM—AI, Vol. 37, pp. 77–84.
Zadeh, L.A. 1976. A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts, Int. Jour. Man-Machine Studies 8, 249–291.
Zadeh, L.A. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Part I: Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249, 1975; Part II: Inf. Sci. 8, 301–357, 1975; Part III: Inf. Sci. 9, 43–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zadeh, L.A. (2005). Web Intelligence, World Knowledge and Fuzzy Logic. In: Nikravesh, M., Zadeh, L.A., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Soft Computing for Information Processing and Analysis. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 164. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32365-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32365-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22930-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32365-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)