Skip to main content

A Robust Semi-automatic Procedure for Motion Quantification of Aortic Stent Grafts Using Point Set Registration

  • Conference paper
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2006

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

  • 1039 Accesses

Abstract

After endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, stent graft migration and kinking or buckling of the stent graft can cause the perilous risk of rupture. In a previous paper we presented an approach to analyze the migration of the stent by defining the spinal canal as a reference object and by investigating the movements relative to it. In this paper, we quantify also non-rigid deformations of the stent. A procedure is used based on the segmentation and extraction of surface points for stent and spinal canal and on point set registration. The sensitivity of the quantified values with respect to the choice of segmentation parameters is investigated as well. Results for 6 patients show that the procedure allows us to distinguish benign cases from dangerous changes in morphology even if segmentation parameters vary within a reasonable bandwidth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rutherford RB, Krupski WC. Current status of open versus endovascular stent-graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2004;39(5).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dattilo JB, et al. Clinical failures of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Incidence, causes, and management. J Vasc Surg 2002;35(6).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brunijne M, et al. Interactive segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysms in CTA images. Med Image Anal 2004;8:127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Subramanyan K, et al. Abdominal aortic stent graft planning with automatically extracted vessel centrelines/cross-sections in multislice CT. In: CARS. Elsevier; 2004. p. 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breeuwer M, et al. Assessment of the rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms by patient-specific hemodynamic modelling-initial results. In: CARS. Elsevier; 2004. p. 1090–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mattes J, et al. Spatio-temporal changes and migration of stent grafts after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. In: CARS. Elsevier; 2005. p. 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mattes J, et al. Quantification of the migration and deformation of abdominal aortic aneurysm stent grafts. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 2006: Image Processing. Proc. of SPIE;. p. accepted.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fritscher K, Schubert R. A software framework for preprocessing and level-set segmentation of medical image data. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 2005: Image Processing. Proc. of SPIE;. p. 1742–1752.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mattes J, Fieres J, Eils R. A shape adapted motion model for non-rigid registration. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing. vol. 4684 of Proc. of SPIE;. p. 518–527.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mattes, J. et al. (2006). A Robust Semi-automatic Procedure for Motion Quantification of Aortic Stent Grafts Using Point Set Registration. In: Handels, H., Ehrhardt, J., Horsch, A., Meinzer, HP., Tolxdorff, T. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2006. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32137-3_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics