Skip to main content

3.0 T MRI Diagnostic Features: Comparison with Lower Magnetic Fields

  • Chapter
High Field Brain MRI

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Scarabino T, Giannatempo GM, Nemore F, et al. (2003) RM 3.0 Tesla. II parte: L’imaging morfo-funzionale cerebrale. Radiol Med 105:150–161

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2003) Risonanza Magnetica 3.0 Tesla. Riv Neuroradiol 16 (Suppl): 314–315

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2004) 3.0 T imaging. Riv Neuroradiol 17:765–776

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2003) 3.0 T magnetic resonance in neuroradiology. Eur J Radiol 48:154–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 38(7): 385–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Norris DG (2003) High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 18:519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2004) Semeiological features of 3.0 TMR imaging: what changes at high magnetic field. Riv Neuroradiol 17:755–764

    Google Scholar 

  8. Takahashi M, Uematsu H, Hatabu H (2003) MR imaging at high magnetic fields. Eur J Radiol 46:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Briellmann RS, Pell GS, Wellard RM, et al. (2003) MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T. Epileptic Disord 5(1):3–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Azmi H, Schulder M (2003) Stereotactic accuracy of a 3 T magnetic resonance unit. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 80(1–4):140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Briellmann RS, Syngeniotis A, Jackson GD (2001) Comparison of hippocampal volumetry at 1.5 Tesla and at 3 Tesla. Epilepsia 42(8):1021–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rutherford M, Malamateniou C, Zeka J, et al. (2004) MR imaging of the neonatal brain at 3 Tesla. Eur J Paediat Neurol 8:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Price RR (1999) MR imaging safety considerations. Radiographics 19:1641–1651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schenck JF (1998) MR safety at high magnetic fields. MRI Clinics North Am 6:715–730

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross JS (2004) The high field strength curmudgeon. AJNR 25:168–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanenbaum LN (2004) 3-T MR imaging: ready for clinical practice (letters). AJNR 25:1626–1627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tropp J (2004) Image brightening in samples of high dielectric constant. J Magn Reson 167:12–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang QX, Wang J, Zhang X (2002) Analysis of wave behaviour in lossy dielectric samples at high field. Magn Reson Med 47:982–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS, et al. (1999) NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 T. JMRI 9:531–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C, et al. (2001) High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0 T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 46:955–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reichenbach JR, Barth M, Haacke EM, et al. (2000) Highresolution MR venography at 3.0 Tesla. Comput Assist Tomogr 24:949–957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Salle F, Esposito F, Elefante A, et al. (2003) High field functional MRI. Eur J Radiol 48:138–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen W, Ugurbil K (1999) High spatial resolution functionalmagnetic resonance imaging at very-high-magnetic field. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10:63–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thulborn KR (1999) Clinical rationale for very-high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10:37–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thulborn KR, Chang SY, Shen GX, et al. (1997) High resolution echo-planar imaging of human cortex at 3.0 T. NMR Biomed 10:183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim D-S, Garwood M (2003) High field magnetic resonance techniques for brain research. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:612–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. (2001) Perfusion-sensitive MR imaging of glioma: comparison between gradient-echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging techniques. AJNR 22:1306–1315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, et al. (2002) Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 T and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 48:242–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heidelmann RM, Griswold MA, Muller M, et al. (2004) Feasibility and limitations of high field parallel MRI. Radiologe 44(1):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Polonara G, Scarabino T, Salvolini U (2003) Basics and new frontiers of MR spectroscopy with high Tesla. Riv Neuroradiol 16 (Suppl):144–148

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barker PB, Hearshen DO, Boska MD (2001) Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Magn Reson Med 45:765–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Costanzo A, Trojsi F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2003) High-field proton MRS of human brain. Eur J Radiol 48:146–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pattany PM (2004) 3 TMR imaging: the pros and cons (editorial). AJNR 25:1455–1456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shapiro MD (2004) The time for 3 T clinical imaging is now (letter). AJNR 25:1628–1629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scarabino, T. et al. (2006). 3.0 T MRI Diagnostic Features: Comparison with Lower Magnetic Fields. In: Salvolini, U., Scarabino, T. (eds) High Field Brain MRI. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31776-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31776-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31775-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31776-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics