Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Scarabino T, Giannatempo GM, Nemore F, et al. (2003) RM 3.0 Tesla. II parte: L’imaging morfo-funzionale cerebrale. Radiol Med 105:150–161
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2003) Risonanza Magnetica 3.0 Tesla. Riv Neuroradiol 16 (Suppl): 314–315
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2004) 3.0 T imaging. Riv Neuroradiol 17:765–776
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2003) 3.0 T magnetic resonance in neuroradiology. Eur J Radiol 48:154–164
Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 38(7): 385–402
Norris DG (2003) High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 18:519–529
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2004) Semeiological features of 3.0 TMR imaging: what changes at high magnetic field. Riv Neuroradiol 17:755–764
Takahashi M, Uematsu H, Hatabu H (2003) MR imaging at high magnetic fields. Eur J Radiol 46:45–52
Briellmann RS, Pell GS, Wellard RM, et al. (2003) MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T. Epileptic Disord 5(1):3–20
Azmi H, Schulder M (2003) Stereotactic accuracy of a 3 T magnetic resonance unit. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 80(1–4):140–145
Briellmann RS, Syngeniotis A, Jackson GD (2001) Comparison of hippocampal volumetry at 1.5 Tesla and at 3 Tesla. Epilepsia 42(8):1021–1024
Rutherford M, Malamateniou C, Zeka J, et al. (2004) MR imaging of the neonatal brain at 3 Tesla. Eur J Paediat Neurol 8:281–289
Price RR (1999) MR imaging safety considerations. Radiographics 19:1641–1651
Schenck JF (1998) MR safety at high magnetic fields. MRI Clinics North Am 6:715–730
Ross JS (2004) The high field strength curmudgeon. AJNR 25:168–169
Tanenbaum LN (2004) 3-T MR imaging: ready for clinical practice (letters). AJNR 25:1626–1627
Tropp J (2004) Image brightening in samples of high dielectric constant. J Magn Reson 167:12–24
Yang QX, Wang J, Zhang X (2002) Analysis of wave behaviour in lossy dielectric samples at high field. Magn Reson Med 47:982–989
Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS, et al. (1999) NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 T. JMRI 9:531–538
Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C, et al. (2001) High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0 T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 46:955–962
Reichenbach JR, Barth M, Haacke EM, et al. (2000) Highresolution MR venography at 3.0 Tesla. Comput Assist Tomogr 24:949–957
Di Salle F, Esposito F, Elefante A, et al. (2003) High field functional MRI. Eur J Radiol 48:138–145
Chen W, Ugurbil K (1999) High spatial resolution functionalmagnetic resonance imaging at very-high-magnetic field. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10:63–78
Thulborn KR (1999) Clinical rationale for very-high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10:37–50
Thulborn KR, Chang SY, Shen GX, et al. (1997) High resolution echo-planar imaging of human cortex at 3.0 T. NMR Biomed 10:183
Kim D-S, Garwood M (2003) High field magnetic resonance techniques for brain research. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:612–619
Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. (2001) Perfusion-sensitive MR imaging of glioma: comparison between gradient-echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging techniques. AJNR 22:1306–1315
Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, et al. (2002) Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 T and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 48:242–254
Heidelmann RM, Griswold MA, Muller M, et al. (2004) Feasibility and limitations of high field parallel MRI. Radiologe 44(1):49–55
Polonara G, Scarabino T, Salvolini U (2003) Basics and new frontiers of MR spectroscopy with high Tesla. Riv Neuroradiol 16 (Suppl):144–148
Barker PB, Hearshen DO, Boska MD (2001) Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Magn Reson Med 45:765–769
Di Costanzo A, Trojsi F, Giannatempo GM, et al. (2003) High-field proton MRS of human brain. Eur J Radiol 48:146–153
Pattany PM (2004) 3 TMR imaging: the pros and cons (editorial). AJNR 25:1455–1456
Shapiro MD (2004) The time for 3 T clinical imaging is now (letter). AJNR 25:1628–1629
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scarabino, T. et al. (2006). 3.0 T MRI Diagnostic Features: Comparison with Lower Magnetic Fields. In: Salvolini, U., Scarabino, T. (eds) High Field Brain MRI. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31776-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31776-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31775-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31776-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)