Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic Dilemmas in FNAC Cytology: Difficult Breast Lesions

  • Chapter
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology

  • 959 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. NHSBSP. Guidelines to Cytology Procedures and Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening. NHSBSP Publication 1993; No. 22,:18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16(4):295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boerner S, Fornage BD, Singletary E, Sneige N. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA. Cancer 1999;87(1):19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lim JC, Al-Masri H, Salhadar A, Xie HB, Gabram S, Wojcik EM. The significance of the diagnosis of atypia in breast fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31(5):285–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. al-Kaisi N. The spectrum of the “gray zone” in breast cytology. A review of 186 cases of atypical and suspicious cytology. Acta Cytol 1994;38(6):898–908.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb RA, Matthews P, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Pinder SE. An audit of “equivocal” (C3) and “suspicious” (C4) categories in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Cytopathology 2001;12(4):219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moyes C, Dunne B. Predictive power of cytomor-phological features in equivocal (C3, C4) breast FNAC. Cytopathology 2004;15(6):305–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mander BJ, Beresford PA, Tildsley G, Qureshi T, Wishart GC. Management of patients with intermediate (C3) cytology and a solitary breast lump. Breast 2001;10(2):163–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Osin P. Abolish C3. Cytopathology 2004;15(1):64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arif S, Singh N. Abolish C3. Cytopathology 2004;15(1):63–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trott PA. Why abolish C3? Cytopathology 2003;14(6):352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanhoush R, Jorda M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Wang H, Mirzabeigi M, Ghorab Z, et al. ‘Atypical’ and ‘suspicious’ diagnoses in breast aspiration cytology. Cancer 2004;102(3):164–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mottahedeh M, Rashid MH, Gateley CA. Final diagnoses following C3 (atypical, probably benign) breast cytology. Breast 2003;12(4):276–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Adnani M, Etessami N, Freeman A, Falzon M. Why abolish C3? Cytopathology 2003;14(5):302–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Purnell D, Walker RA. Analysis of C3 and C4 breast cytology: can unnecessary cytospins be avoided? Cytopathology 2004;15(6):337–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Troxel DB. Diagnostic Pitfalls in Surgical Pathology-Uncovered by a Review of Malpractice Claims: Part II. Breast Fine Needle Aspirations. Int J Surg Pathol 2000;8(3):229–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stanley MW, Tani EM, Skoog L. Fine-needle aspiration of fibroadenomas of the breast with atypia: a spectrum including cases that cytologically mimic carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1990;6(6) 1990;6(6):375–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benoit JL, Kara R, McGregor SE, Duggan MA. Fibroadenoma of the breast: diagnostic pitfalls of fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1992;8(6):643–7; discussion 647–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Myers T, Wang HH. Fibroadenoma mimicking papillary carcinoma on ThinPrep of fine-needle aspiration of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124(11):1667–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Simsir A, Waisman J, Cangiarella J. Fibroadenomas with atypia: causes of under-and overdiagnosis by aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25(5):278–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sturgis CD, Sethi S, Cajulis RS, Hidvegi DF, Yu GH. Diagnostic significance of ‘benign pairs’ and signet ring cells in fine needle aspirates (FNAs) of the breast. Cytopathology 1998;9(5):308–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Veneti S, Manek S. Benign phyllodes tumour vs fibroadenoma: FNA cytological differentiation. Cytopathology 2001;12(5):321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krishnamurthy S, Ashfaq R, Shin HJ, Sneige N. Distinction of phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma: a reappraisal of an old problem. Cancer 2000;90(6):342–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scolyer RA, McKenzie PR, Achmed D, Lee CS. Can phyllodes tumours of the breast be distinguished from fibroadenomas using fine needle aspiration cytology? Pathology 2001;33(4):437–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tse GM, Ma TK, Pang LM, Cheung H. Fine needle aspiration cytologic features of mammary phyllodes tumors. Acta Cytol 2002;46(5):855–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dusenbery D, Frable WJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of phyllodes tumor. Potential diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1992;36(2):215–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deen SA, McKee GT, Kissin MW. Differential cytologic features of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;20(2):53–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nayar R, De Frias DV, Bourtsos EP, Sutton V, Bedrossian C. Cytologic differential diagnosis of papillary pattern in breast aspirates: correlation with histology. Ann Diagn Pathol 2001;5(1):34–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dawson AE, Mulford DK. Fine needle aspiration of mucinous (colloid) breast carcinoma. Nuclear grading and mammographic and cytologic findings. Acta Cytol 1998;42(3):668–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Michael CW, Buschmann B. Can true papillary neoplasms of breast and their mimickers be accurately classified by cytology? Cancer 2002;96(2):92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gomez-Aracil V, Mayayo E, Azua J, Arraiza A. Papillary neoplasms of the breast: clues in fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology 2002;13(1):22–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong SI CH, Tse GM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. A case report. Acta Cytol 2000;44(6):1085–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Onguru O, Deveci S, Gunhan O. Cytological findings of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a report of two cases. Cytopathology 2002;13(3):160–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng WK. Fine-needle aspiration cytology findings of an uncommon micropapillary variant of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast: review of patients over an 8-year period. Cancer 2002;96(5):280–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Simsir A, Waisman J, Thorner K, Cangiarella J. Mammary lesions diagnosed as “papillary” by aspiration biopsy: 70 cases with follow-up. Cancer 2003;99(3):156–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Masood S, Loya A, Khalbuss W. Is core needle biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions? Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28(6):329–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Malley FP BA. The spectrum of apocrine lesions of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol 2004;11(1):1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ng WK, Kong JH, Wong WW. Atypical apocrine metaplasia: a diagnostic pitfall in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Acta Cytol 2003;47(4):698–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshida K, Inoue M, Furuta S, Sakai R, Imai R, Hayakawa S, et al. Apocrine carcinoma vs. apocrine metaplasia with atypia of the breast. Use of aspiration biopsy cytology. Acta Cytol 1996;40(2):247–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Eusebi V, Foschini MP, Bussolati G, Rosen PP. Myo-blastomatoid (histiocytoid) carcinoma of the breast. A type of apocrine carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19(5):553–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wong NL, Wan SK. Mucocele-like lesion of the breast-histopathology and fine needle aspiration cytology changes. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 1999;28(5):327–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Farshid G PS, King JM, Robinson J. Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: a benign cause for indeterminate or suspicious mammographic microcalcifica-tions. Breast J 2005;11(1):15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheng L, Lee WY, Chang TW. Benign mucocele-like lesion of the breast: how to differentiate from mucinous carcinoma before surgery. Cytopathology 2004;15(2):104–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ventura K CJ, Lee I, Moreira A,Weisman J, Simsir A. Aspiration biopsy of mammary lesions with abundant mucinous material. Review of 43 cases with surgical follow up. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120(2):194–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ng WK. Mammary mucinous carcinoma with marked cytoplasmic hyalinization. A report of 2 cases with emphasis on fine needle aspiration cytologic findings. Acta Cytol 2003;47(6):1045–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yeoh GP, Cheung PS, Chan KW. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of mucocelelike tumors of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23(5):552–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wong NL, Wan SK. Comparative cytology of mucocelelike lesion and mucinous carcinoma of the breast in fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2000;44(5):765–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Carder PJ MC, Liston JC. Surgiccal excision warranted following a core biopsy diagnosis of mucocoele like lesion of the breast. Histopathology 2004;45(2):148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lerma E FV, Carreras A, Esteva E, Prat J. Undetected invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: review of false-negative smears. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23(5):303–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hwang S, Ioffe O, Lee I, Waisman J, Cangiarella J, Simsir A. Cytologic diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma: factors associated with negative and equivocal diagnoses. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31(2):87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rajesh L, Dey P, Joshi K. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lobular breast carcinoma. Comparison with other breast lesions. Acta Cytol 2003;47(2):177–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. de las Morenas ACP, Moroz K, Donelly MM. Cytologic diagnosis of ductal versus lobular carcinoma of the breast. Acta Cytol 1995;39(5):865–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nijhawan R, Rajwanshi A, Gautam U, Gupta SK. Cytoplasmic vacuolation, intracytoplasmic lumina, and DPAS staining in ductal carcinoma of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28(6):291–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dabbs DJ, Grenko RT, Silverman JF. Fine needle aspiration cytology of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast. Duct carcinoma as a diagnostic pitfall. Acta Cytol 1994;38(6):923–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Klijanienko J, Katsahian S, Vielh P, Masood S. Stromal infiltration as a predictor of tumor invasion in breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30(3):182–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Prediction of invasive-ness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17(5):315–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McKee GT, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: Invasive vs. in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25(1):73–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sauer T, Young K, Thoresen SO. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the work-up of mammographic and ultrasonographic findings in breast cancer screening: an attempt at differentiating in situ and invasive carcinoma. Cytopathology 2002;13(2):101–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bofin AM, Lydersen S, Hagmar BM. Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31(4):207–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B, Pellegrini M, Mauri MF, Dalla Palma P. Cytologic features of 22 radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast, three of which associated with carcinoma: clinical, mammographic, and histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17(5):353–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Berner A, Davidson B, Sigstad E, Risberg B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29(6):344–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gobbi H, Simpson JF, Jensen RA, Olson SJ, Page DL. Metaplastic spindle cell breast tumors arising within papillomas, complex sclerosing lesions, and nipple adenomas. Mod Pathol 2003;16(9):893–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jain S, Kumar N, Sodhani P, Gupta S. Cytology of collagenous spherulosis of the breast: a diagnostic dilemma—report of three cases. Cytopathology 2002;13(2):116–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Saqi A, Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30(4):271–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mesonero CE, Tabbara S. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of ductal adenoma: report of a case associated with a mucocele-like lesion. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;13(3):252–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Amrikachi M, Green LK, Rone R, Ramzy I. Gyne-comastia: cytologic features and diagnostic pitfalls in fine needle aspirates. Acta Cytol 2001;45(6):948–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Silverman JF, Geisinger KR, Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of mesenchymal tumors of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 1988;4(1):50–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Chhieng DC, Cangiarella JF, Waisman J, Fernandez G, Cohen JM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of spindle cell lesions of the breast. Cancer 1999;87(6):359–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Gomez-Aracil V, Mayayo E, Azua J, Mayayo R, Azua-Romeo J, Arraiza A. Fine needle aspiration cytology of mammary hamartoma: a review of nine cases with histological correlation. Cytopathology 2003;14(4):195–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Herbert M, Schvimer M, Zehavi S, Mendlovic S, Karni T, Pappo I, et al. Breast hamartoma: fine-needle aspiration cytologic finding. Cancer 2003;99(4):255–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Chhieng DC, Cohen JM. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of mammary fibromatosis: a case report and review of literature. Cytopathology 1999;10(5):354–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Pereira S, Tani E, Skoog L. Diagnosis of fibromatosis colli by fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Cytopathology 1999;10(1):25–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Pieterse AS, Mahar A, Orell S. Granular cell tumour: a pitfall in FNA cytology of breast lesions. Pathology 2004;36(1):58–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Salto-Tellez M, Saunders C, Kocjan G. Diagnosis of multiple granular cell tumours by fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology 2000;11(3):191–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fisher PE, Estabrook A, Cohen MB. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of intramammary neurilemoma. Acta Cytol 1990;34(1):35–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Staklenac B, Pauzar B, Pajtler M, Loncar B, Dmitro-vic B. An unusual tumour of the breast: cytological findings. Cytopathology 2004;15(3):160–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lew WY. Spindle cell lipoma of the breast: a case report and literature review. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9(4):434–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lopez-Rios F, Burgos F, Madero S, Ballestin C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, de Agustin P. Fine needle aspiration of breast myofibroblastoma. A case report. Acta Cytol 2001;45(3):381–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Powari M, Srinivasan R, Radotra BD. Myofibroblastoma of the male breast: a diagnostic problem on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26(5):290–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Munitiz V, Rios A, Canovas J, Ferri B, Sola J, Canovas P, et al. Primitive leiomyosarcoma of the breast: case report and review of the literature. Breast 2004;13(1):72–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Jun Wei X, Hiotis K, Garcia R, Hummel Levine P. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a difficult diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29(3):172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Choi HJ, Park IA. Fine needle aspiration cytology of metastatic choriocarcinoma presenting as a breast lump. A case report. Acta Cytol 2004;48(1):91–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hejmadi RK, Day LJ, Young JA. Extramammary metastatic neoplasms in the breast: a cytomor-phological study of 11 cases. Cytopathology 2003;14(4):191–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Carson KF, Hirschowitz SL, Nieberg RK, Sadeghi S. Pitfalls in the cytologic diagnosis of angiosar-coma of the breast by fine-needle aspiration: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;11(3):297–9; discussion 299–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Galindo LM, Shienbaum AJ, Dwyer-Joyce L, Garcia FU. Atypical hemangioma of the breast: a diagnostic pitfall in breast fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;24(3):215–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Ng WK, Chiu CS, Han KC, Chow JC. Mammary pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia. A reappraisal of the fine needle aspiration cytology findings. Acta Cytol 2003;47(3):373–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Nogueira M, Andre S, Mendonca E. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast—fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology findings. Cytopathology 1998;9(5):291–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gupta RK, Kenwright D, Naran S, Lallu S, Fauck R. Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of secretory carcinoma of the breast. Cytopathology 2000;11(6):496–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Jayaram G, Looi LM, Yip CH. Fine needle aspiration cytology of secretory carcinoma of breast: a case report. Malays J Pathol 1997;19(1):69–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Pohar-Marinsek Z, Golouh R. Secretory breast carcinoma in a man diagnosed by fine needle aspiration biopsy. A case report. Acta Cytol 1994;38(3):446–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Insabato L, Russo R, Cascone AM, Angrisani P. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lipid-secre-ting breast carcinoma. A case report. Acta Cytol 1993;37(5):752–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Gupta RK, Lallu S, Naran S, Fauck R, Gaskell D. Aspiration cytodiagnosis of the breast with abundant acellular calcific material indicative of soft tissue calcinosis (a study of 3 cases). Cytopathology 2002;13(2):111–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Kumar N, Verma K. Clear cell hidradenoma simulating breast carcinoma: a diagnostic pitfall in fine-needle aspiration of breast. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15(1):70–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Pascual A, Casado I, Colmenero I, Pelayo A, Asenjo JA. Fine needle aspiration cytology of pilomatrixo-ma of the breast. Acta Cytol 2000;44(2):274–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Shet TM, Rege JD. Aspiration cytology of tubular adenomas of the breast. An analysis of eight cases. Acta Cytol 1998;42(3):657–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Kumar N, Kapila K, Verma K. Characterization of tubular adenoma of breast—diagnostic problem in fine needle aspirates (FNAs). Cytopathology 1998;9(5):301–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Ng WK. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast. A review of three cases with reappraisal of the fine needle aspiration biopsy findings. Acta Cytol 2002;46(2):317–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Ng WK, Kong JH. Significance of squamous cells in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of cases in a seven-year period. Acta Cytol 2003;47(1):27–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Silverman JF, Lannin DR, Unverferth M, Norris HT. Fine needle aspiration cytology of subareolar abscess of the breast. Spectrum of cytomorphologic findings and potential diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1986;30(4):413–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Salto-Tellez M, Kocjan G. Lymphocytic mastopathy in a patient with previous breast cancer diagnosed by fine-needle aspirate. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23(2):141–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Singh NG, Kapila K, Dawar R, Verma K. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of lympho-proliferative disease of the breast. Acta Cytol 2003;47(5):739–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Zardawi IM, Clark D, Williamsz G. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the breast. A case report. Acta Cytol 2003;47(6):1077–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Markovic-Glamocak M, Sucic M, Krizanac S, Ries S, Gjadrov-Kuvezdic K, Boban D. Cytodiagnosis in irradiated breast cells—its value and pitfalls. Lijec Vjesn 2003;125(7–8):180–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Diagnostic Dilemmas in FNAC Cytology: Difficult Breast Lesions. In: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31412-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31412-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25639-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31412-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation