Skip to main content

A Cross-cultural Evaluation Framework for Behavioral Biometric User Authentication

  • Conference paper
From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering

Abstract

Today biometric techniques are based either on passive (e.g. IrisScan, Face) or active methods (e.g. voice and handwriting). In our work we focus on evaluation of the latter. These methods, also described as behavioral Biometric, are characterized by a trait that is learnt and acquired over time. Several approaches for user authentication have been published, but today they have not yet been evaluated under cultural aspects such as language, script and personal background of users. Especially for handwriting such cultural aspects can lead to a significant and essential outcome, as different spoken and written languages are being used and also the script used for handwriting is different in nature.

This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union (project Culture Tech, see http://amsl-smb.cs.unimagdeburg.de/culturetech/).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • JAIN, A. K. et al. (2004): Soft Biometric Traits for Personal Recognition Systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Biometric Authentication (ICBA). Hong Kong, LNCS 3072, 731–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAIN, A. K. et al. (2004): Can soft biometric traits assist user recognition?. In: Proceedings of SPIE Biometric Technology for Human Identification. Orlando, FL, U.S.A., 5404, 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • PATIL HEMANT, A. and BASU, T. K. (2004): Speech corpus for text/language independent speaker recognition in Indian languages. The National symposium on Morphology, Phonology and Language Engineering, SIMPLE’04. A1–A4.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHEIDAT, T. and VIELHAUER, C. (2005): Fusion von biometrischen Verfahren zur Benutzerauthentifikation. In: P. Horster (Ed.), D-A-CH Security 2005-Bestandsaufnahme, Konzepte, Anwendungen, Perspektiven. 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHIMKE, S. et al. (2004): Cross Cultural Aspects of Biometrics. In: Proceedings of Biometrics: Challenges arising from Theory to Practice. 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOMAI, C.I. et al. (2004): Group Discriminatory Power of Handwritten Characters. In: Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging. 5296, 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • VIELHAUER, C. et al. (2005): Finding Meta Data in Speech and Handwriting Biometrics. In: Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T. 5681, 504–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • VIELHAUER, C. (2006): Biometric User Authentication For IT Security: From Fundamentals to Handwriting. Springer, New York, U.S.A., to appear 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wolf, F., Basu, T.K., Dutta, P.K., Vielhauer, C., Oermann, A., Yegnanarayana, B. (2006). A Cross-cultural Evaluation Framework for Behavioral Biometric User Authentication. In: Spiliopoulou, M., Kruse, R., Borgelt, C., Nürnberger, A., Gaul, W. (eds) From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31314-1_80

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics