Skip to main content

The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimisation in Forest Planning

  • Chapter
Book cover Sustainable Forest Management

Abstract

This chapter explains several multi-criteria decision analysis methods that can be used to systematise the evaluation of alternative forest plans. The discussed methods include SMART (the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique), AHP (the Analytic Hierarchy Process), outranking methods, and voting methods. The second part of the chapter summarises various methods of heuristic search, which can be used to find good combinations of management alternatives for forest stands. The following heuristics area are explained: random ascent, Hero, simulated annealing, threshold accepting, great deluge, tabu search, and genetic algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bettinger P, Boston K, Sessions J (1999) Intensifying a heuristic forest harvest scheduling search procedure with 2-opt decision choices. Can J For Res 29:1784–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger P, Graetz D, Boston K, Sessions J, Chung W (2002) Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fenn 36(2):561–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges JG, Hoganson HM, Falcão AO (2002) Heuristics in multi-objective forest planning. In: Pukkala T (ed) Multi-objective forest planning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 119–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) A preference ranking organization method. Manage Sci 31(6):647–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowsland KA (1993) Simulated annealing. In: Reeves CR (ed) Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. Wiley, New York, pp 20–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards W (1971) Social utilities. Engineering economist. Summer Symp Ser 6:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • French S (1989) Readings in decision analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York, 210 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1998) Even swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs. Harvard Business Rev March–April:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen T, Pukkala T (2004) A comparison of one-and two-compartment neighbourhoods in heuristic search with spatial forest management goals. Silva Fenn 38(3):319–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas J, Kangas A (2002) Multiple criteria decision support methods in forest management. In: Pukkala T (ed) Multi-objective forest planning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 37–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurttila M, Pukkala T (2003) Combining holding-level economic goals with spatial landscape-level goals in the planning of multiple ownership forestry. Landscape Ecol 18: 529–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1998) SMAA — stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur J Operat Res 106:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen S, Kangas A, Kangas J (2001) Monitavoitteisen ryhmäpäätöstuen tekniikoita metsälön hoidon ja käytön suunnitteluun. Res Note 124. Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, 60 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lootsma FA (1993) Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. J Multi Criteria Decision Anal 2:87–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma D, Zheng X (1991) 9/9–9/1 scale method of AHP. In: Proc 2nd Int Symp AHP, vol 1. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp 197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T (2002) Introduction to multi-objective forest planning. In: Pukkala T(ed) Multi-objective forest planning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T (2004) Dealing with ecological objectives in the Monsu planning system. Silva Lusi-tana 12:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T, Kangas J (1993) A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision-making. Scand J For Res 8:560–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves CR (ed) (1993) Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. Wiley, New York, 320 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Render B, Stair RM (1992) Introduction to management science. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 856 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of Electre methods. Theory Decision 31:49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 287 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (1997) On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi Criteria Decision Anal 6:309–319

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pukkala, T. (2006). The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimisation in Forest Planning. In: Hasenauer, H. (eds) Sustainable Forest Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31304-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics