Skip to main content

Occupational Contact Dermatitis

  • Chapter
Contact Dermatitis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Calnan CD, Rycroft RJG (1981) Rehabilitation in occupational skin disease. Trans Coll Med S Afr 25(Suppl Rehabil):136–142

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diepgen TL (2003) Occupational skin-disease data in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickel H, Kuss O, John SM, Blome O, Hagemann KH, Schwanitz HJ (2004) Early secondary prevention of occupational skin disease in Germany: the dermatologist’s procedure in perspective. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:142–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adisesh A, Meyer JD, Cherry NM (2002) Prognosis and work absence due to occupational contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 46:273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutchings CV, Shum KW, Gawkrodger DJ (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis has an appreciable impact on quality of life. Contact Dermatitis 45:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathias CGT (1988) Occupational dermatoses. J Am Acad Dermatol 19:1107–1114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams RM (1990) Occupational skin disease, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gawkrodger DJ (2004) Occupational skin cancers. Occup Med (Lond) 54:458–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brauel P, Brauel R, Stresemann E (1995) Aerogenes Kontaktekzem und Bronchialasthma durch Kolophonium-Sensibilisierung. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 30:549–551

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calnan CD (1977) Prosser White Oration 1977. Dermatology and industry. Clin Exp Dermatol 3:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fregert S (1975) Occupational dermatitis in a 10-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  12. Obituary (1991) N. Hjorth, 1919–1990. Contact Dermatitis 24:161–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Obituary (1998) H. Ippen, 1914–1993. Contact Dermatitis 39:159–160

    Google Scholar 

  14. Obituary (1999) V. Pirilä, 1915–1998. Contact Dermatitis 40:231

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foussereau J (1991) Guide de dermato-allergologie professionnelle. Masson, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zschunke E (1985) Grundriss der Arbeitsdermatologie. VEB Verlag Volk und Gesundheit, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. English JSC (1998) A colour handbook of occupational dermatology. Manson, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dickel H, Schmidt A, Kretz J, Diepgen TL (2002) Importance of irritant contact dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am J Clin Dermatol 3:283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius CR, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2001) Occupational skin diseases in Northern Bavaria between 1990 and 1999: a population-based study. Br J Dermatol 145:453–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson MK (1999) Population differences in skin structure and physiology and the susceptibility to irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: implications for skin safety testing and risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis 41:65–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dickel H, John SM (2003) Ratio of irritant contact dermatitis to allergic contact dermatitis in occupational skin disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 49:360–361, author reply 361–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McFadden JP, Basketter DA (2000) Contact allergy, irritancy and ‘danger’. Contact Dermatitis 42:123–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL (1998) Risk for hand eczema in employees with past or present atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickel H, Bruckner TM, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2003) Impact of atopic skin diathesis on occupational skin disease incidence in a working population. J Invest Dermatol 121:37–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Allen MH, Wakelin SH, Holloway D, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Barker JNWN, McFadden JP (2000) Association of TNF? gene polymorphism at position-308 with susceptibility to irritant contact dermatitis. Immunogenetics 51:201–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dooms-Goossens A, Deleu H (1991) Airborne contact dermatitis: an update. Contact Dermatitis 25:211–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rycroft RJG, Baran R (1994) Occupational abnormalities and contact dermatitis. In: Baran R, Dawber RPR (eds) Diseases of the nails and their management, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 263–284

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wall LM, Gebauer KA (1991) A follow-up study of occupational skin disease in Western Australia. Contact Dermatitis 24:241–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosen RH, Freeman S (1993) Prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis in New South Wales, Australia. Contact Dermatitis 29:88–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jungbauer FH, van der Vleuten P, Groothoff JW, Coenraads PJ (2004) Irritant hand dermatitis: severity of disease, occupational exposure to skin irritants and preventive measures 5 years after initial diagnosis. Contact Dermatitis 50:245–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalimo K, Kautiainen H, Niskanen T, Niemi L (1999) ‘Eczema school’ to improve compliance in an occupational dermatology clinic. Contact Dermatitis 41:315–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hogan DJ, Dannaker CJ, Maibach HI (1990) Contact dermatitis: prognosis, risk factors, and rehabilitation. Semin Dermatol 9:233–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meneghini CL, Angelini G (1984) Primary and secondary sites of occupational contact dermatitis. Derm Beruf Umwelt 32:205–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. De Groot AC (1994) Patch testing. Test concentrations and vehicles for 3700 chemicals, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2002) Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of occupational skin disease. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:423–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bruze M, Zimerson E (1997) Cross-reaction patterns in patients with contact allergy to simple methylol phenols. Contact Dermatitis 37:82–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Karlberg A-T (1991) Air oxidation increases the allergenic potential of tall-oil rosin. Colophony contact allergens also identified in tall-oil rosin. Am J Contact Dermat 2:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  38. Karlberg A-T, Magnusson K, Nilsson U (1992) Air oxidation of d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens. Contact Dermatitis 26:332–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Christensen LP, Kristiansen K (1999) Isolation and quantification of tuliposides and tulipalins in tulips (Tulipa) by high-performance liquid chromatography. Contact Dermatitis 40:300–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fenske RA (1993) Dermal exposure assessment techniques. Ann Occup Hyg 37:687–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fenske RA, Birnbaum SG (1997) Second generation video imaging technique for assessing dermal exposure (VITAE System). Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 58:636–645

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lind ML, Boman A Surakka J, Sollenberg J, Meding B (2004) A method for assessing occupational dermal exposure to permanent hair dyes. Ann Occup Hyg 48:533–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fregert S (1963) The organization of occupational dermatology in Lund. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 43:203–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lobel E (1995) Post-contact chronic eczema: pension or rehabilitation. Aust J Dermatol 36:59–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W, Schnuch A; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IDVK) (2003) Occupational rubber glove allergy: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 1995–2001. Contact Dermatitis 48:39–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Davies NF, Rycroft RJG (2000) Dermatology. In: Cox RAF, Edwards FC, Palmer K (eds) Fitness for work, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 453–462

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zschunke E (1978) Metal corrosion (rust) as a result of hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Monatsschr 164:727–728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Calnan CD (1970) Studies in contact dermatitis. XXIII. Allergen replacement. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc 56:131–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fregert S (1980) Possibilities of skin contact in automatic processes. Contact Dermatitis 6:23

    Google Scholar 

  50. Forsberg K, Keith LH (1999) Chemical protective clothing performance index, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhai H, Maibach HI (1998) Moisturizers in preventing irritant contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 38:241–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Held E, Agner T (1999) Comparison between 2 test models in evaluating the effect of a moisturizer on irritated human skin. Contact Dermatitis 40:261–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Schlüter-Wigger W, Elsner P (1996) Efficacy of 4 commercially available protective creams in the repetitive irritation test (RIT). Contact Dermatitis 34:278–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Healy J, Johnson S, Little MC, MacNeil S (1998) An in vitro study of the use of chelating agents in clearing nickelcontaminated human skin: an alternative approach to preventing nickel allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 39:171–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gruvberger B, Bruze M (1998) Can glutathione-containing emollients inactivate methyl-chloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone? Contact Dermatitis 38:261–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kütting B, Drexler H (2003) Effectiveness of skin protection creams as a preventive measure in occupational dermatitis: a critical update according to criteria of evidence-based medicine. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:253–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Henschel R, Agathos M, Breit R (1999) Acute irritant contact dermatitis from propionic acid used in animal feed preservation. Contact Dermatitis 40:328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Spiewak R (2001) Pesticides as a cause of occupational skin diseases in farmers. Ann Agric Environ Med 8:1–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Bransbury A, Burge S (1998) Rubber allergy in a shepherdess. Contact Dermatitis 39:45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Gauchia R, Rodriguez-Serna M, Silvestre JF, Linana JJ, Aliaga A (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis from streptomycin in a cattle breeder. Contact Dermatitis 35:374–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Schauder S, Schröder W, Geier J (1996) Olaquindox-induced airborne photoallergic contact dermatitis followed by transient or persistent light reactions in 15 pig breeders. Contact Dermatitis 35:344–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kanerva L, Susitaival P (1996) Cow dander: the most common cause of occupational contact urticaria in Finland. Contact Dermatitis 35:309–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Mahler V, Diepgen TL, Hesse A, Peters K-P (1998) Protein contact dermatitis due to cow dander. Contact Dermatitis 38:47–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Vente C, Fuchs T (1997) Contact dermatitis due to oil of turpentine in a porcelain painter. Contact Dermatitis 37:187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Raccagni AA, Baldari U, Righini MG (1996) Airborne dermatitis in a painter. Contact Dermatitis 35:119–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Eedy D (1996) Carbon-fibre-induced airborne irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 35:362–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hjerpe L (1986) Chromate dermatitis in an engine assembly department. Contact Dermatitis 14:66–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Kanerva L (1998) Occupational fingertip protein contact dermatitis from grain flours and natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 38:295–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kanerva L, Vanhanen M, Tupasela O (1997) Occupational allergic contact urticaria from fungal but not bacterial alpha-amylase. Contact Dermatitis 36:306–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Bauer A, Bartsch R, Stadeler M, Schneider W, Grieshaber R, Wollina U, Gebhardt M (1998) Development of occupational skin diseases during vocational training in baker and confectioner apprentices: a follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis 39:307–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Nethercott JR, Holness DL (1989) Occupational dermatitis in food handlers and bakers. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:485–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bauer A, Kelterer D, Stadeler M, Schneider W, Kleesz P (2001) The prevention of occupational hand dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and employees in the catering trades. Preliminary results of a skin prevention program. Contact Dermatitis 44:85–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Cronin E (1989) Dermatitis in food handlers. Adv Dermatol 4:113–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Bruynzeel DP (1997) Bulb dermatitis. Dermatological problems in the flower bulb industries. Contact Dermatitis 37:70–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Shum KW, English JSC (1998) Allergic contact dermatitis in food handlers, with patch tests positive to Compositae mix but negative to sesquiterpene lactone mix. Contact Dermatitis 39:207–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J (1976) Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis 2:28–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Verlinden V, Goossens A (2003) Airborne occupational allergic contact dermatitis from N, N-bis[2-bromo-ethyl] aniline and N, N-bis [2-[(methylsulfonyl)-oxy]ethyl]aniline in a chemistry student. Contact Dermatitis 49:169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Le Coz CJ, Lepoittevin JP (2001) Occupational erythemamultiforme-like dermatitis from sensitization to costus resinoid, followed by flare-up and systemic contact dermatitis from beta-cyclocostunolide in a chemistry student. Contact Dermatitis 44:310–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Nielsen J (1996) The occurrence and course of skin symptoms on the hands among female cleaners. Contact Dermatitis 34:284–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Karlberg A-T, Dooms-Goossens A (1997) Contact allergy to oxidized d-limonene among dermatitis patients. Contact Dermatitis 36:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Allenby CF, Basketter DA (1994) The effect of repeated open exposure to low levels of nickel on compromised hand skin of nickel-allergic subjects. Contact Dermatitis 30:135–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Nilsson EJ, Knutsson A (1995) Atopic dermatitis, nickel sensitivity and xerosis as risk factors for hand eczema in women. Contact Dermatitis 31:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Zachariae COC, Agner T, Menné T (1996) Chromium allergy in consecutive patients in a country where ferrous sulfate has been added to cement since 1981. Contact Dermatitis 35:83–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Olsavszky R, Rycroft RJG, White IR, McFadden JP (1998) Contact sensitivity to chromate: comparison at a London contact dermatitis clinic over a 10-year period. Contact Dermatitis 38:329–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Skogstad M, Levy F (1994) Occupational irritant contact dermatitis and fungal infection in construction workers. Contact Dermatitis 31:28–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Condé-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Villegas C, Romero MA, Gonzalez MA (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in construction workers. Contact Dermatitis 33:226–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Koh D, Foulds IS, Aw TC (1990) Dermatological hazards in the electronics industry. Contact Dermatitis 22:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Lovell CR (1993) Plants and the skin. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  89. Wilkinson SM, Pollock B (1999) Patch test sensitization after use of the Compositae mix. Contact Dermatitis 40:277–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Scales JW, Sherertz EF (1997) Occupational dermatitis transferred with job duties. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8:179–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Leino T, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1998) Occupational allergic dermatoses in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 38:166–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Armstrong DKB, Jones AB, Smith HR, Ross JS, White IR, Rycroft RJG, McFadden JP (1999) Occupational sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: a 17-year review. Contact Dermatitis 41:348–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Kanerva L, Leino T (1999) Prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 41:168–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Camarasa JM, Diepgen TL, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lachappelle JM, Lahti A, Menne T, Seidenari S, Tosti A, Wahlberg JE (2002) Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991–2000). Contact Dermatitis 46:207–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Armstrong DKB, Smith HR, Rycroft RJG (1999) Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile presenting as severe scalp seborrhoeic eczema. Contact Dermatitis 40:335

    Google Scholar 

  96. Armstrong DKB, Smith HR, Ross JS, White IR (1999) Sensitization to cocamidopropylbetaine: an 8-year review. Contact Dermatitis 40:335–336

    Google Scholar 

  97. Foti C, Bonamonte D, Mascolo G, Corcelli A, Lobasso S, Rigano L, Angelini G (2003) The role of 3-dimethyllaminopropylamine and amidoamine in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine. Contact Dermatitis 48:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ (1996) Occupational dermatitis in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 35:364–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Cockayne SE, Gawkrodger DJ (1997) Occupational contact dermatitis in an aromatherapist. Contact Dermatitis 37:306–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Keane FM, Smith HR, White IR, Rycroft RJ (2000) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in two aromatherapists. Contact Dermatitis 43:49–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. O’Reilly FM, Murphy GM (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis in a beautician. Contact Dermatitis 35:47–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Wakelin SH, White IR (1999) Natural rubber latex allergy. Clin Exp Dermatol 24:245–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O; DVK study group; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (2001) Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup Environ Med 58:392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Diba VC, Chowdhury MM, Adisesh A, Statham BN (2003) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in hospital workers caused by methyldibromo glutaronitrile in a work soap. Contact Dermatitis 48:118–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Sanchez-Perez J, Garcia-Diez A (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from eugenol, oil of cinnamon and oil of cloves in a physiotherapist. Contact Dermatitis 41:346–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Kanerva L, Mikola H, Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1998) Fingertip paresthesia and occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylics in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis 38:114–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Alanko K, Susitaival P, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (2004) Occupational skin diseases among dental nurses. Contact Dermatitis 50:77–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Wrangsjö K, Swartling C, Meding B (2001) Occupational dermatitis in dental personnel: contact dermatitis with special reference to (meth)acrylates in 174 patients. Contact Dermatitis 45:158–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P (1995) Occupational hand dermatitis in hospital environments. Contact Dermatitis 33:172–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Berl V, Barbaud A, Lepoittevin J-P (1998) Mechanism of allergic contact dermatitis from propacetamol: sensitization to activated N, N-diethylglycine. Contact Dermatitis 38:185–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. de Groot H, de Jong NW, Duijster E, van Wijk RG, Vermeulen A, van Toorenenbergen AW, Geursen L, van Joost T (1998) Prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy (type I and type IV) in laboratory workers in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 38:159–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Le Coz C-J, Coninx D, Van Rengen A, El Aboubi S, Ducombs G, Benz M-H, Boursier S, Avenel-Audran M, Verret J-L, Erikstam U, Bruze M, Goossens A (1999) An epidemic of occupational contact dermatitis from an immersion oil for microscopy in laboratory personnel. Contact Dermatitis 40:77–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1999) Occupational dermatoses among laboratory assistants. Contact Dermatitis 40:166–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Pryce DW, White J, English JSC, Rycroft RJG (1989) Soluble oil dermatitis: a review. J Soc Occup Med 39:93–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Uter W (2004) Contact sensitization in metalworkers with occupational dermatitis exposed to water-based metalworking fluids: results of the research project “FaSt”. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:543–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ (2004) Patch testing with metalworking fluids from the patient’s workplace. Contact Dermatitis 51:172–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Bruze M, Hradil E, Eriksohn I-L, Gruvberger B, Widström L (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from alkanolamineborates in metalworking fluids. Contact Dermatitis 32:24–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Sasseville D, al-Khenaizan S (1997) Occupational contact dermatitis from ethylenediamine in a wire-drawing lubricant. Contact Dermatitis 36:228–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Lange-Ionescu S, Bruze M, Gruvberger B, Zimmerson E, Frosch PJ (2000) Kontaktallergie durch kohlefreies Durchschlagpapier. Dermatosen 48:183–187

    Google Scholar 

  120. Lewis RD, Feir D, Roegner K, Nayan A, Vordtriede S (1999) Investigation of bites and itching in a word processing department. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 60:310–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Corazza M, Maranini C, Venturini D, Virgili A (1999) Contact allergy to mercaptobenzothiazole in a bank clerk from a wet sponge. Contact Dermatitis 41:105–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (2000) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by a personal-computer mouse. Contact Dermatitis 43:362–363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Garcia-Morales I, Garcia Bravo B, Camacho Martinez F (2003) Occupational dermatitis caused by a personalcomputer mouse mat. Contact Dermatitis 49:172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Capon F, Cambie MP, Clinard F, Bernardeau K, Kalis B (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by computer mice. Contact Dermatitis 35:57–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Lewis AT, Hsu S, Phillips RM, Lee JA (2000) Computer palms. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:1073–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Vermeer MH, Bruynzeel DP (2001) Mouse fingers, a new computer-related skin disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Romaguera C, Vilaplana J (2000) Occupational contact dermatitis from ylang-ylang oil. Contact Dermatitis 43:251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Walker SL, Smith HR, Rycroft RJ, Broome C (2000) Occupational contact dermatitis from headphones containing diethylhexyl phthalate. Contact Dermatitis 42:164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Ormerod AD, Wakeel RA, Mann TAN, Main RA, Aldridge RD (1989) Polyamine sensitization in offshore workers handling drilling muds. Contact Dermatitis 21:326–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Rycroft RJG (1999) Petroleum and petroleum derivatives. In: Adams RM (ed) Occupational skin disease, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp 553–566

    Google Scholar 

  131. Marconi PMB, Campagna G, Fabri G, Schiavino D (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis from colour developers used in automated photographic processing. Contact Dermatitis 40:109–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Scheman AJ, Katta R (1997) Photographic allergens: an update. Contact Dermatitis 37:130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1996) Offset printer’s occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by cobalt-2-ethylhexoate. Contact Dermatitis 34:67–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Livesley EJ, Rushton L, English JS, Williams HC (2002) The prevalence of occupational dermatitis in the UK printing industry. Occup Environ Med 59:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Goossens A, Coninx D, Rommens K, Verhamme B (1998) Occupational dermatitis in a silk-screen maker. Contact Dermatitis 39:40–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Aalto-Korte K, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K, Kanerva L (1996) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 35:193–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Hjorth N (1978) Gut eczema in slaughterhouse workers. Contact Dermatitis 4:49–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J (1980) Allergic contact dermatitis in veterinary surgeons. Contact Dermatitis 6:27–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Dwyer CM, Ormerod AD (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis from thiuram in a veterinary medication. Contact Dermatitis 37:132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Rycroft RJG (1988) Looking at work dermatologically. Dermatol Clin 6:1–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Veien N, Hattel T, Laurberg G (1997) Low-humidity dermatosis from car heaters. Contact Dermatitis 37:138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Rycroft RJG (1980) Occupational dermatoses in perspective. Lancet 2:24–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Maguire A (1978) Psychic possession among industrial workers. Lancet 1:376–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rycroft, R.J., Frosch, P.J. (2006). Occupational Contact Dermatitis. In: Frosch, P.J., Menné, T., Lepoittevin, JP. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24471-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31301-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics