Skip to main content

Metalworking Fluids

  • Chapter
Contact Dermatitis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allenby CF, Basketter DA (1989) Minimum eliciting patch test concentrations of cobalt. Contact Dermatitis 20:185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alomar A, Conde-Salazar L, Romaguera C (1985) Occupational dermatoses from cutting oils. Contact Dermatitis 12:129–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (1991) DIN 51385 Schmierstoffe; Kühlschmierstoffe; Begriffe. Beuth, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anonymous (1993) Technische Regeln für Gefahrstoffe (TRGS) 611, Verwendungsbeschränkungen für wassermischbare bzw. wassergemischte Kühlschmierstoffe, bei deren Einsatz N-Nitrosamine auftreten können. Heymanns, Cologne, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous (1999) Berufsgenossenschaftliche Regeln für Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit, BGR 143. Heymanns, Cologne, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (2000) Kühlschmierstoffe. In: Greim H (ed) Gesundheitsschädliche Arbeitsstoffe. Toxikologisch-arbeitsmedizinische Begründungen von MAK-Werten. 31. Lieferung. VCH, Weinheim, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold WP, van Joost T, van der Valk PGM (1995) Adding p-aminoazobenzene may increase the sensitivity of the European standard series in detecting contact allergy to dyes, but carries the risk of active sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 33:444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bauer A, Geier J, Lessmann H, Elsner P (2004) Kontaktallergien gegen Textilfarbstoffe. Ergebnisse des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK). Aktuel Dermatol 30:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Elsener P (2000) Hand eczema in metalworker trainees — an analysis of risk factors. Contact Dermatitis 43:327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brasch J, Schnuch A, Geier J, Aberer W, Uter W: German Contact Dermatitis Research Group; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (2004) Iodopropynylbutyl carbamate (IPBC) 0.2% is suggested for patch testing of patients with eczema possibly related to preservatives. Br J Dermatol 151:608–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinkmeier T, Geier J, Lepoittevin JP, Frosch PJ (2002) Patch test reactions to Biobans in metalworkers are often weak and not reproducible. Contact Dermatitis 47:27–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruze M, Hradil E, Eriksohn IL, Gruvberger B, Widström L (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from alkanolamineborates in metalworking fluids. Contact Dermatitis 332:24–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crow KD, Peachey RDG, Adams JE (1978) Coolant oil dermatitis due to ethylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 4:359–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Boer EM, van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP (1989) Dermatoses in metal workers. (I). Irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 20:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Boer EM, van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP (1989) Dermatoses in metal workers. (II). Allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 20:280–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Einarsson Ö, Kylin B, Lindstedt G, Wahlberg JE (1975) Chromium, cobalt and nickel in used cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 1:182–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Einarsson Ö, Eriksson E, Lindstedt G, Wahlberg JE (1979) Dissolution of cobalt from hard metal alloys by cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 5:129–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fewings J, Menné T (1999) An update of the risk assessment for methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) with focus on rinse-off products. Contact Dermatitis 41:1–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher AA (1998) Ethylenediamine hydrochloride versus amines in cutting oils. Am J Contact Dermat 9:139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Foulds IS (2000) Cutting fluids. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology, Chap 86. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 691–700

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Peiler D, Dreier B, Rabenhorst S (1997) Die Epikutantestung mit patienteneigenen Produkten. In: Plewig G, Przybilla B (eds) Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie 15. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 166–181

    Google Scholar 

  22. Funke U, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL (2001) Incidence of work-related hand eczema during apprenticeship: first results of a prospective cohort study in the car industry. Contact Dermatitis 44:166–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Geier J, Schnuch A (1996) No cross sensitization between MCI/MI, benzisothiazolinone and octylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis 34:148–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Geier J, Fuchs T, Schnuch A (1996) Zunahme der Kontaktallergien gegen Methyldibromoglutaronitril in Deutschland. Allergologie 19:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  25. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Fuchs T (1997) Kontaktallergien durch formaldehydabspaltende Biozide. Eine Analyse der Daten des IVDK aus den Jahren 1992 bis 1995. Allergologie 20:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  26. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schumacher T, Eckert C, Becker D, Boveleth W, Buß M, Eck E, Englitz H-G, Koch P, Müller J, Nöring R, Rocker M, Rothe A, Schmidt A, Uter W, Warfolomeow I, Zoellner G (2000) Vorschlag für die Epikutantestung bei Verdacht auf Kontaktallergie durch Kühlschmierstoffe. 1. Kommerziell erhältliche Testsubstanzen. Derm Beruf Umwelt 48:232–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Geier J, Schnuch A, Brasch J, Gefeller O (2000) Patch testing with methyldibromoglutaronitrile. Am J Contact Dermat 11:207–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Geier J, Lessmann H, Graefe A, Fuchs T (2002) Contact allergy to diglycolamine in a water-based metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 46:121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Geier J, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ, Pirker C, Koch P, Aschoff R, Richter G, Becker D, Eckert C, Uter W, Schnuch A, Fuchs T (2003) Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids. Contact Dermatitis 49:85–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schmidt A, Englitz HG, Schnuch A (2003) Kontaktekzeme durch Kühlschmierstoffe in der Metallindustrie. Aktuel Dermatol 29:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Geier J, Lessmann H, Dickel H, John SM, Frosch PJ, Koch P, Becker D, Jappe U, Aberer W, Schnuch A, Uter W (2004) Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Contact Dermatitis 51:118–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Uter W (2004) Contact sensitizations in metalworkers with occupational dermatitis exposed to water-based metalworking fluids: results of the research project “FaSt”. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:543–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ (2004) Patch testing with metalworking fluids from the patient’s workplace. Contact Dermatitis 51:172–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Grattan CEH, English JSC, Foulds IS, Rycroft RJG (1989) Cutting fluid dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 20:372–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gruvberger B, Isaksson M, Frick M, Pontén A, Bruze M (2003) Occupational dermatoses in a metalworking plant. Contact Dermatitis 48:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hausen BM, Krohn K, Budianto E (1990) Contact allergy due to colophony. (VII). Sensitizing studies with oxidation products of abietic and related acids. Contact Dermatitis 23:352–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hausen BM, Börries M, Budianto E, Krohn K (1993) Contact allergy due to colophony. (IX). Sensitization studies with further products isolated after oxidative degradation of resin acids and colophony. Contact Dermatitis 29:234–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hausen BM, Brinkmann J, Dohn W (1998) Lexikon der Kontaktallergene, 6. Ergänzungs-Lieferung, Kolophonium, K 4. Ecomed, Landsberg, Germany, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hornstein OP (1984) Ekzemkrankheiten. Therapiewoche 34:400–409

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ippen H (1979) Allergische Hautschäden bei der Metallbearbeitung. Derm Beruf Umwelt 27:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Isaksson M (2002) Delayed diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis from sodium pyrithione in a metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 47:248–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Isaksson M, Frick M, Gruvberger B, Pontén A, Bruze M (2002) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from the extreme pressure (EP) additive, zinc, bis ((O,O’-di-2-ethylhexyl) dithiophosphate) in neat oils. Contact Dermatitis 46:248–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jensen CD, Andersen KE (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from a condensate of boric acid, monoethanolamine and fatty acids in a metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 49:45–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K, Kanerva L (2000) Patch testing with a patient’s own materials handled at work. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology, Chap 47. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 375–383

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kanerva L, Tupasela O, Jolanki R (2001) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethylhexylzinc dithiophosphate and fatty acid polydiethanolamide in cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 44:193–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Karlberg A-T (1991) Air oxidation increases the allergenic potential of tall oil rosin. Colophony contact allergens also identified in tall oil resin. Am J Contact Dermat 2:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  47. Koch P (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from oleyl alcohol and monoethanolamine in a metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 33:273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Krbek F, Schäfer Th (1991) Untersuchungen an Tropfen und Rückständen von wassermischbaren Kühlschmierstoffen. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Präventivmed 26:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  49. le Coz C-J (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from sodium pyrithione in metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 45:58–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lehmann E, Fröhlich N (1993) Kühlschmierstoffe —Zusätzliche Belastungen durch Metallionen? Amtliche Mitteilungen der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz, Januar 1993, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  51. Majoie IML, van Ginkel CJW (2000) The biocide iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC) as an allergen in cutting oils. Contact Dermatitis 43:238–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Malten KE (1981) Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 7:238–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Malten KE (1987) Old and new, mainly occupational dermatological problems in the production and processing of plastics. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn. Yearbook Medical, Chicago, Ill., p 310

    Google Scholar 

  54. Meding B (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis from tertiary-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) in a cutting fluid. Contact Dermatitis 34:224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Minkwitz R, Fröhlich N, Lehmann E (1983) Untersuchungen von Schadstoffbelastungen an Arbeitspl↦zen bei der Herstellung und Verarbeitung von Metallen — Beryllium, Cobalt und deren Legierungen. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz, Fb 367, Dortmund, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mowad CM (2000) Methylchloro-isothiazolinone revisited. Am J Contact Dermat 11:114–118

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nethercott JR, Rothman N, Holness DL, O’Toole T (1990) Health problems in metal workers exposed to a coolant oil containing Kathon 886 MW. Am J Contact Dermat 1:94–99

    Google Scholar 

  58. Owen CM, August PJ, Beck MH (2000) Contact allergy to oak moss resin in a soluble oil. Contact Dermatitis 43:112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Pfeiffer W, Breuer D, Blome H, Deninger C et al (1996) BIA-Report 7/96 Kühlschmierstoffe. Herausgegeben vom Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften (HVBG), Sankt Augustin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  60. Piebenga WP, van der Walle HB (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from 1-[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-(2-propenyloxy) ethyl]-1H-imidazole in a water-based metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 48:285–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pryce DW, Irvine D, English JSC, Rycroft RJG (1989) Soluble oil dermatitis: a follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis 21:28–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Pryce DW, White I, English JSC, Rycroft RJG (1989) Soluble oil dermatitis: a review. J Soc Occup Med 39:93–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Robinson MK, Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, McNamee P, White IR, Basketter DA (2000) The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 42:251–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Rycroft RJG (1987) Cutting fluids, oil, and lubricants. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn. Yearbook Medical, Chicago, Ill., p 289

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rystedt I (1979) Evaluation and relevance of isolated test reactions to cobalt. Contact Dermatitis 5:233–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Scheinman PL (1996) Multiple sensitizations in a machinist using a new cooling fluid. Am J Contact Dermat 7:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Schnuch A, Geier J, Brasch J, Uter W (2002) The preservative iodopropynyl butylcarbamate: frequency of allergic reactions and diagnostic considerations. Results from the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 46:153–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ (1996) Prognosis of occupational hand dermatitis in metalworkers. Contact Dermatitis 34:27–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Skudlik C, Schwanitz H-J (2003) Berufsbedingte Handekzeme — Ätiologie und Prävention. Allergo J 12:513–52

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sonnenschein G (1998) Kühlschmierstoffe. In: Konietzko J, Dupuis H (eds) Handbuch der Arbeitsmedizin, 20. Ergänzungslieferung 5/98, Kap IV-2.47.1. Ecomed, Landsberg, Germany, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  71. Thamm H (1997) Formaldehyd und Formaldehydabspalter in Kühlschmierstoffen: aktueller Stand. Allergologie 20:232–238

    Google Scholar 

  72. Tiedemann K-H, Zoellner G, Adam M, Becker D, Boveleth W, Eck E, Eckert C, Englitz H-G, Geier J, Koch P, Lessmann H, Müller J, Nöring R, Rocker M, Rothe A, Schmidt A, Schumacher T, Uter W, Warfolomeow I, Wirtz C (2002) Empfehlungen für die Epikutantestung bei Verdacht auf Kontaktallergie durch Kühlschmierstoffe. 2. Hinweise zur Arbeitsstofftestung. Derm Beruf Umwelt 50:180–189

    Google Scholar 

  73. Uter W, Schaller S, Bahmer FA, Brasch J et al (1993) Contact allergy in metal workers — a one-year analysis based on data collected by the “Information Network of Dermatological Clinics” (IVDK) in Germany. Derm Beruf Umwelt 41:220–22

    Google Scholar 

  74. Uter W, Geier J, Ippen H (1996) Nachrichten aus dem IVDK: Aktuelle Sensibilisierungshäufigkeiten bei der DKG-Testreihe “Metallverarbeitung”. Derm Beruf Umwelt 44:34–36

    Google Scholar 

  75. Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A (1999) Unverträglichkeitsreaktionen gegen Körperpflege-und Haushaltsprodukte: was ist zu tun? Die Informations-und Dokumentationsstelle für Kontaktallergien (IDOK) des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK). Deutsche Dermatologe 47:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  76. Uter W, Gefeller O, Geier J, Lessmann H, Pfahlberg A, Schnuch A (2002) Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit der Sensibilisierung gegen wichtige Allergene von arbeitsbedingten sowie individuellen Faktoren. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Forschung, Fb 949. Wissenschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  77. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Becker D, Fuchs Th, Richter G; IDVK Study Group; German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) (2002) The spectrum of allergic (cross-)sensitivity in clinical patch testing with “para amino” compounds. Allergy 7:319–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wahlberg JE (1973) Thresholds of sensitivity in metal contact allergy. 1. Isolated and simultaneous allergy to chromium, cobalt, mercury and-or nickel. Berufsdermatosen 21:22–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Wahlberg JE, Lindstedt G, Einarsson cobalt and nickel in Swedish cement, detergents, mould and cutting oils. Berufsdermatosen 25:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Camarasa JM, Diepgen TL, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lachappelle JM, Lahti A, Menne T, Seidenari S, Tosti A, Wahlberg JE (2002) Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991–2000). Contact Dermatitis 46:207–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geier, J., Lessmann, H. (2006). Metalworking Fluids. In: Frosch, P.J., Menné, T., Lepoittevin, JP. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24471-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31301-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics