Skip to main content

The parliamentarisation of the institutional structure of the European Union between representative democracy and participatory democracy

  • Chapter
Governing Europe under a Constitution

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • I have dealt at length with certain general profiles of EU democratic legitimation regarding the problem of democracy within post-national political organisations in my Il principio democratico fra stati nazionali e Unione europea, in: A. Bovenschulte, H. Grub, M. Schwanenfügel (eds.), Selbstverwaltung und Demokratie in Europa. Festschrift für Dian Schefold, Baden-Baden, 2001, 207 et seqq. (to which the reader is referred for further references to the literature).

    Google Scholar 

  • The most complete examination of the theoretical problems of the democratic deficit in the European institutions is in M. Kaufmann, Europäische Integration und Demokratieprinzip, Baden-Baden, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • A review of numerous problematic aspects of the Community democratic deficit is in M.G. Schmidt, Demokratietheorien, 3rd edn, Opladen, 2000, 424 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • An updated picture of the EU democratic deficit debate can be seen in D. Santonastaso, La dinamica fenomenologica della democrazia comunitaria. Il deficit democratico delle istituzioni e della normazione dell’Ue, Napoli, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the problem of democracy in the post-national political organisations see J. Habermas, La costellazione postnazionale, Milan, 1999, 105 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Of the many other writers, see O. Höffe, Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, München, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Baldassarre, Globalizzazione contro democrazia, Bari-Rome, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Volkmann, Setzt Demokratie den Staat voraus?, in: AöR, 2002, 575 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Gosepath, J.C. Merle (Eds.), Weltrepublik. Demokratisierung und Demokratie, München, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • As regards to Europe, see P.C. Schmitter, Come democratizzare l’Unione Europea e perchè, Bologna, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gusy, Demokratiedefizite postnationaler Gemeinschaften unter Berücksichtigung der Europäischen Union, in: H. Brunkhorst, M. Kettner (Eds.), Globalisierung und Demokratie, Frankfurt a. M., 2000, 133 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Negri, L’Europa e l’impero, Rome, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Bronzini et al., Europa, costituzione e movimenti sociali, Rome, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Balibar, Nous, citoyens d’Europe? Le frontiéres, l’Etat, le peuple, Paris, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the transformation of the European “form of government” see A.A. Cervati, Elementi di indeterminatezza e di conflittualità nella forma di governo europea, in: Annuario dell’Associazione italiana dei costituzionalisti. La Costituzione europea, Padova, 1999, 73 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mangiameli, La forma di governo europea, in: G. Guzzetta (ed.), Questioni costituzionali del governo europeo, Padova, 2003, 67 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the shifting of the issue of the EU democracy towards the question of transparency (especially in ECJ case-law) see S. Ninatti, Giudicare la democrazia? Processo politico e ideale democratico nella giurisprudenza della Corte di Giustizia europea, Milan, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the links between democracy and Integrationslehre, among the newer focuses see G. Frankenberg, Autorität und Integration, Frankfurt a. M., 2003, 73 et seqq. (with reference to Europe).

    Google Scholar 

  • For the references in the text to the Habermas-Luhmann dispute on procedure see J. Habermas, Fatti e norme, Milan, 1996, 341 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Luhmann, Procedimenti giuridici e legittimazione sociale, Milan, 1995, 177 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • The two short papers by B. Conforti and A. Tizzano mentioned in the paper can be seen in: Il diritto dell’Unione Europea 2004, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Among the most important works on the debate on the constitutionalisation of the EU, I would just mention: P. Häberle, Europäische Verfassungslehre, 2nd edn., Baden-Baden, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • D.T. Tsatsos, Die europäische Grundordnung, Baden-Baden, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Mac Cormick, La sovranità in discussione. Diritto, stato e nazione nel “commonwealth” europeo, Bologna, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H.H. Weiler, La Costituzione dell’Europa, Bologna, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • For a critical examination of the functionalist paradigm see F. W. Scharpf, Governare l’Europa. Legittimità democratica ed efficacia delle politiche dell’Unione Europea, Bologna, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • for the federalist view, cf. A. von Bogdandy, Supranationaler Föderalismus als Wirklichkeit und Idee einer neuen Herrschaftsform, Baden-Baden, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • The “dynamic” idea of federalism accepted in the text is due to the theoretic elaboration by C.J. Friedrich, Governo costituzionale e democrazia, Vicenza, 1950, 274 et seqq., 309 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • accepted by A. La Pergola, in his introduction to Le prospettive dell’Unione Europea e la Costituzione, Padova, 1992, 7 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the theoretical development of the thesis on democracy mediated by the Member States’ parliamentary democracy, see G. Ress, Parlamentarismo e democrazia in Europa, Napoli, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • for an insightful criticism of it, see S. Oeter, Souveränität und Demokratie als Probleme in der Verfassungsentwicklung der EU, in: ZaöRV, 1995, 659 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • With regard to the question of the “uniqueness” of the European demos from different points of view, see E. W. Böckenförde, Staat, Nation, Europa, Frankfurt a. M., 1999, 89 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Grimm, Die Verfassung und die Politik, München, 2002, 215 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H.H. Weiler, op. cit, 451 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the tension between majority principle and consensus within democracies, focusing on the comparative models of federalism, see T. Fleiner, L.R. Basta Fleiner, Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3rd edn., Berlin-New York, 2004, 513 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • On multilevel constitutionalism cfr. I. Pernice, Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-making revisited?, in: CMLR, 1999, 703 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Morlok, Möglich-keiten und Grenzen einer europäischen Verfassungstheorie, in: Düsseldorfer rechtswissenschaftliche Schriften, I, Baden-Baden, 1999, 113 et seqq

    Google Scholar 

  • On the unknown factors in the principle of subsidiarity in the European system, I would refer to my own paper, which gives more references to the literature, Il principio di sussidiarietà e la forma di stato di democrazia pluralistica, in: A.A. Cervati, S.P. Panunzio, P. Ridola (eds.), Studi sulla riforma costituzionale, Torino, 2001, 247 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • The formula «parlamento nazional-comunitario» is due to V. Lippolis, Il parla-mento nazionalcomunitario, in: Quad. cost., 1991, 319 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Fitoussi’s quotations come from Il dittatore benevolo. Saggio sul governo dell’Europa, Bologna, 2002, 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the peculiarity of a multiple demoi democracy see H. Abromeit, Volkssouveränität in komplexen Gesellschaften, in: H. Brunkhorst, P. Niesen (eds.), Das Recht der Republik, Frankfurt a. M, 1999, 17 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the relationship between representative and plebiscitary components of democracy, one fundamental work is the classic essay by E. Fränkel, La componente rappresentativa e la componente plebiscitaria nello stato costituzionale democratico (1958) Italian edizion by D. Nocilla, Torino, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • There may be found different approaches to the tension between constitutionalism and the constitutional experiences of twentieth century democracies in A. Pace, Le sfide del costituzionalismo nel XXI secolo, in: Dir. pubbl., 2003, 890 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ridola, Il costituzionalismo: itinerari storici e percorsi concettuali, in: Studi in onore di Gianni Ferrara, Torino, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Di Giovine, Le tecniche del costituzionalismo del Novecento per limitare la tirannide della maggioranza, in: G.M. Bravo (ed.), La democrazia fra libertà e tirannide della maggioranza nell’Ottocento, Firenze, 2004, 309 et seqq.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ridola, P. (2006). The parliamentarisation of the institutional structure of the European Union between representative democracy and participatory democracy. In: Blanke, HJ., Mangiameli, S. (eds) Governing Europe under a Constitution. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31291-9_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics