Skip to main content

Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization and Visualization

  • Conference paper
New Developments in Computational Fluid Dynamics
  • 874 Accesses

Summary

Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) have been used to visualize tradeoffs of Pareto solutions in the objective function space for engineering design obtained by Evolutionary Computation. Furthermore, based on the codebook vectors of cluster-averaged values of respective design variables obtained from the SOM, the design variable space is mapped onto another SOM. The resulting SOM generates clusters of design variables, which indicate roles of the design variables for design improvements and tradeoffs. These processes can be considered as data mining of the engineering design. Data mining example will be given for supersonic wing design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Hollmen, Self-Organizing Map, http://www.cis.hut.fi/~jhollmen/dippa/node7.html, last access on October 3, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Sasaki, S. Obayashi and K. Nakahashi, “Navier-Stokes Optimization of Supersonic Wings with Four Objectives Using Evolutionary Algorithm”. Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 39, No. 4, (2002), pp. 621–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. M. Fonseca and P. J. Fleming, “Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Formulation, Discussion and Generalization”. Proc. of the 5th ICGA, (1993), pp. 416–423.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Obayashi, S. Takahashi and Y. Takeguchi, “Niching and Elitist Models for MOGAs”. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Vol. 1498, Berlin Heidelberg New York, (1998), pp. 260–269.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. J. Eshelman and J. D. Schaffer, Real-Coded Genetic Algorithms and Interval Schemata. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, (1993), pp. 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eudaptics software gmbh. http://www.eudaptics.com/technology/somine4.html, last access on October 3, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Vesanto and E. Alhoniemi, “Clustering of the Self-Organizing Map”. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 11, No. 3, (2000), pp. 586–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Obayashi, S. (2005). Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization and Visualization. In: Fujii, K., Nakahashi, K., Obayashi, S., Komurasaki, S. (eds) New Developments in Computational Fluid Dynamics. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (NNFM), vol 90. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31261-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31261-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27407-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31261-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics