Skip to main content

Japanese New Product Advantage: A Comparative Examination

  • Chapter
  • 1236 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong JS and Overton TS (1997): ‘Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys’ Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14, pp. 396–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf A, Cravens DW, and Piercy NF (2001): ‘Examining business strategy, sales management, and salesperson antecedents of sales organization effectiveness’ Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 21(2), pp. 109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991): ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’ Journal of Management, Vol.17(1), pp.99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB, Ketchen Jr. MW (2001): ‘Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view’ Journal of Management, Vol. 27(6), pp.625–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM and Kenny DA (1986): ‘The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 1173–1182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley DA, Kuh E, and Welsch RE (1980): Regression Diagnostics, New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SL and Eisenhardt KE (1995): ‘Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions’ Academy of Management Review, Vol.20(2), pp. 343–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Calantone RJ, Schmidt JB, and Song XM (1996): ‘Controllable factors of new product success: a cross-national comparison’ Marketing Science, Vol. 15(4), pp. 15: 341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang CS and Chang NJ (1994): The Korean Management System. Westport: Quorum Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung KH, Lee HC, and Jung KH (1997): Korean Management: Global Strategy and Cultural Transformation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA (1979): ‘A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs’ Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16 (February), pp. 64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark KB and Fujimoto T (1991): Product Development Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG (1979): ‘The dimensions of industrial new product success’ Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43(3), pp. 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG (1983): ‘The impact of new product strategies’ Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.12, pp. 243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG (1994): ‘New products: the factors that drive success’ International Marketing Review, Vol. 11, pp. 60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG and Kleinschmidt EJ (1987): ‘New products: what separates winners from losers’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 4(3), pp.169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG and Kleinschmidt EJ (1993): ‘Major new products: what distinguishes the winners in the chemical industry?’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.10(2), pp. 90–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG and Kleinschmidt EJ (1995): ‘Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12(5), pp. 374–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day GS and Wensley R (1988): ‘Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority’ Journal of Marketing, Vol.52(2), pp. 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas S and Craig CS (1983): International Marketing Research, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995): Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg J, Lehman DR, and Mazursky D (2001): ‘The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success’ Management Science, Vol. 47(1), pp. 69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin A and Page AL (1993): ‘An interim report on measuring product development success and failure’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10, pp. 291–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Han JK, Kim N, and Srivastava RK (1998): ‘Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?’ Journal of Marketing, Vol.62 (October), pp. 30–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori T (1989): ‘Japanese zaibatsu and Korea chaebol’ in Chung KH and Lee HC (Eds.) Korean Managerial Dynamics, New York, NY: Praeger, pp.79–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Henard DH and Szymanski DM (2001): ‘Why some new products are more successful than others’ Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 (August), pp. 362–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult GT and Ketchen Jr. DJ (2001): ‘Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance’ Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 899–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai K, Nonaka I, and Takeuchi H (1985): ‘Managing the new product development process: how Japanese companies learn and unlearn’ in Hayes RH, Clark K, and Lorenz C (Eds.), The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press, pp.337–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Jap SD and Ganesan S (2000): ‘Control mechanisms and relationship life cycle: implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment’ Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37(2), pp. 227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurana A and Rosenthal SR (1998): ‘Toward holistic front ends in new product development’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15(1), pp. 57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama F (1995): Emerging Patterns of Innovation: Sources of Japan’s Technological Edge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T and Calantone RJ (1998): ‘The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination’ Journal of Marketing, Vol.29(4), pp.13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindman M (2000): ‘New product uniqueness in the context of industrial product development’ Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 16, pp. 247–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn GS, Abel KD, Valentine WS, and Wright RC (1999): ‘Key factors in increasing speed to market and improving new product success rates’ Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 28(4), pp. 319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan R and Grover R (1998): ‘From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: new product development as knowledge management’ Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 (October), pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidique MA and Zirger BJ (1984): ‘The new product learning cycle’ Research Report Series, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Institute, School of Business Administration, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, February, pp. 85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Kim D, and Lee DH (1996): ‘Factors affecting new product success: cross-country comparisons’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13(6), pp.530–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert RK, De Meyer A, Souder WE, and Deschoolmeester D (1995): ‘R&D-marketing communications during fuzzy front end’ IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 42(3), pp. 243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Weiss MM and Calantone R (1994): ‘Determinants of new product performance: a review and meta-analysis’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11, pp. 397–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobelius D and Trygg L (2002): ‘Stop chasing the front end process-management of the early phases in product development projects’ International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20, pp. 331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy NF, Cravens DW, and Morgan NA (1999): ‘Relationships between sales management control, territory design, salesforce performance and sales organization effectiveness’ British Journal of Management, Vol. 10, pp. 95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid SE and de Brentani U (2004): ‘The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 21, pp.170–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E (1983): Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Song M and Montoya-Weiss MM (2001): ‘The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development’ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 (February), pp. 61–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Song XM, Montoya-Weiss MM, and Schmidt JB (1997): ‘The role of marketing in developing successful new products in South Korea and Taiwan’ Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 69(3), pp. 47–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Song XM and Parry ME (1997a): ‘The determinants of Japanese new product success’ Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34, pp. 64–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Song XM and Parry ME (1997b): ‘A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States’ Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 (April), pp. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Song XM and Parry ME (1999): ‘Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan’ Journal of Operations Management, Vol.17, pp. 665–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M and Xie J (2000): ‘Does innovativeness moderate the relationship between cross-functional integration and product performance?’ Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 8, pp. 61–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder WE and Song XM (1998): ‘Analyses of US and Japanese management processes associated with new product success and failure in high and low familiarity markets’ Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15(3), pp. 208–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verganti R (1997): ‘Leveraging on systematic learning to manage the early phases of product innovation projects’ R&D Management, Vol. 27(4), pp. 377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura N and Anderson P (1997): Inside the Kaisha: Demystifying Japanese Business Behavior, Boston: Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman G, Duncan R, and Holbek J (1973): Innovations and Organizations, New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nakata, C., Im, S. (2006). Japanese New Product Advantage: A Comparative Examination. In: Herstatt, C., Stockstrom, C., Tschirky, H., Nagahira, A. (eds) Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31248-X_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics