Skip to main content

An Adaptive Importance Sampling Technique

  • Conference paper
Book cover Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2004

Summary

This paper proposes a new adaptive importance sampling (AIS) technique for approximate evaluation of multidimensional integrals. Whereas known AIS algorithms try to find a sampling density that is approximately proportional to the integrand, our algorithm aims directly at the minimization of the variance of the sample average estimate. Our algorithm uses piecewise constant sampling densities, which makes it also reminiscent of stratified sampling. The algorithm was implemented in C-programming language and compared with VEGAS and MISER.

The work of this author was supported by Finnish Academy under contract no. 3385

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I. Babuška and W. C. Rheinboldt. Error estimates for adaptive finite element computations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 15(4):736–754, 1978.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Lars O. Dahl. An adaptive method for evaluating multidimensional contingent claims: Part I. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 6:301–316, 2003.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel Fink. Automatic importance sampling for low dimensional integration. Working paper, Cornell University, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. C. Genz. Testing multidimensional integration routines. Tools, Methods and Languages for Scientific and Engineering Computation, pp. 81–94, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tim C. Hesterberg. Weighted average importance sampling and defensive mixture distributions. Technometrics, 37(2):185–194, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Hlawka and R. Mück. Über eine Transformation von gleichverteilten Folgen. II. Computing (Arch. Elektron. Rechnen), 9:127–138, 1972.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. G. P. Lepage. A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration. Journal of Computational Physics, 27:192–203, 1978.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. B. Owen and Y. Zhou. Adaptive importance sampling by mixtures of products of beta distributions, 1999. URL http://wwwstat.stanford.edu/~owen/reports/.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical recipes in C, The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. H. Press and G. R. Farrar. Recursive stratifield sampling for multidimensional monte carlo integration. Computers in Physics, 27:190–195, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. T. Rockafellar. Convex analysis. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ping Zhang. Nonparametric importance sampling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 91(435):1245–1253, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pennanen, T., Koivu, M. (2006). An Adaptive Importance Sampling Technique. In: Niederreiter, H., Talay, D. (eds) Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2004. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31186-6_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics