Skip to main content

Russia’s Integration Into the World Economy: An Interjurisdictional Competition View

  • Conference paper
Economic Liberalization and Integration Policy

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 135.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akhmetova, G. (2002) Corruption in Oil-Extracting Countries. Almaty: Kuldzakhan (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer W., Cavalcanti T. and P. Silva. (2003). Economic Integration without Policy Coordination: The Case of MERCOSUR, in: Schüller A., Thieme J. (Eds.) Ordnungsprobleme der Weltwirtschaft. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, P. and D. Rodionov (2002). Rent seeking in Russia and in CIS. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill Olcott, M. (2003). Kazakhstan: The Unfulfilled Way. Moscow, Gendalf (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeier, TH. (1997). Wettbewerb und Unternehmertum in der Systemtransformation — Das Problem des institutionellen Interregnums im Prozess des Wandels von Wirtschaftssystemen. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bank of the Russian Federation (2004). Statistics, www.cbr.ru

    Google Scholar 

  • CSRS (Center for Statistics and Research of Science) (2003). The Science of Russia, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski, M. and R. Gortat (2002). Political Determinants of Economic Reforms in Former Communist Countries. Economicheskiy Vestnik, Vol.2, No.4 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezhina, I. and L. Graham (2002). Russian Basic Science after Ten Years of Transition and Foreign Support. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Working Paper No.24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. Eine empirische Analyse der Auswirkungen des internationalen Steuerwettbewerbs. Gutachten zuhanden der UBS AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser Institute (2003). Economic Freedom of the World: Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, D. (2003). Political System of the Modern Russia and its Live Cycle. Svobodnaya Mysl, No. 11 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J. (1998). Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics, Vol. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, J., Jones, G. and D. Kaufmann (2000). Are Foreign Investors and Multinationals Engaged in Corrupt Practices in Transition Economies? // Transition, May–Juny–July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Foundation (2004). Index of Economic Freedom 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indem Foundation (2001). Diagnostics of Russian Corruption: A Sociological Analysis. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janeba, E. and G. Schjelderup (2003). Tax Competition: A Review of the Theory. Report No. 3 in the Globalisation Project, commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, D. (1997). Theories of Interjurisdictional Competition. // New England Economic Review, March/April.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2003). Corporate Tax Rate Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstrup, S. (2002). What Do Theories of Tax Competition Predict for Capital Taxes in EU Countries: A Review of Tax Competition Literature. HEI Working Paper, No. 05/2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstrup, S. (2003). Are Capital Taxes Racing to the Bottom in the European Union. HEI Working Paper, No. 1/2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, Vol.73, No.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipold, H. (1997): Der Zusammenhang zwischen gewachsener und gesetzten Ordnung: Einige Lehren aus den postsozialistischen Reformerfahrungen, in: Cassel, D. (Ed.): Institutionelle Probleme der Systemtransformation, Berlin, Duncker&Humblott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipold, H. (1997a) Der Zusammenhang swischen dem Entstehen und dem Wettbewerb von Ordnungen, in Von Delhaes, K. and U. Fehl (Eds.) Dimensionen des Wettbewerbs. Stuttgart: Lucius&Lucius Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopashenko, N. (2002). Problems of Capital Flight from Russia and Options for Its Recurrence. Saratov (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukashov, D., Arinin, S., Kocheshkova, N. and M. Isahanian (2003). From Private Property to the Market: Equity Market Strategy, Moscow: FINAM Research (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummert, A. and U. Mummert (2000). Institutioneller Wettbewerb in Entwicklungsländern im institutionellen Wettbewerb. Max-Planck Institut zur Erforschung von Wirtschaftssystemen Diskussionsbeitrag 03-00.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, A. Costs and Perspectives of Russian Reforms — An Institutional Approach. Istocki, Vol.3 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panther, S. (1998). Historisches Erbe der Transformation: „Lateinische“ Gewinner — orto-doxe Verlierer?, in: Wegner G., Wieland J. (Eds.) Formelle und informelle Institutionen — Genese, Interaktion und Wandel, Marburg, Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popow, W. (2002). State, Democracy and Economic Growth. Moscow, Instiute for Complex Strategic Studies (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. and L. Zingales (2003). Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, M. (2002). Effiziente Steuersysteme und internationaler Steuerwettbewerb. Frankfurt/Main, Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonin, K. (2002). Why the Reach May Favor Poor Protection of Propery Rights. William Davidson Working Paper No. 544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M. (1996). Systemwettbewerb und Harmonisierung im europäischen Integrationsprozess, in: Cassel D. (Ed.) Entstehung und Wettbewerb von Systemen. Berlin: Duncker&Humblott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2003). Transparency International Corruption Perception Index. Press Release, October 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2002). Kazakhstan Country Fact Sheet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2001). Analysis of World Systems and Situation in the Modern World. St.-Petersburg: Letniy Sad (Russian Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welfens, P.J.J. (2003). Regionale Integration in der Ordnungs-, Außenwirtschafts-und Wachstumtheorie. Paper presented at the Radain Seminar on Institutional Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (1999). Theories of Tax Competition. National Tax Journal, Vol.52.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Democracy Audit (2003). Corruption Ranking. http://www.worldaudit.org/corruption.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, G. and P. Mieszkovski (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.19, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Libman, A. (2006). Russia’s Integration Into the World Economy: An Interjurisdictional Competition View. In: Broadman, H.G., Paas, T., Welfens, P.J. (eds) Economic Liberalization and Integration Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31183-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics