Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary

  • Chapter
Controversies in Laparoscopic Surgery

  • 799 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;1:CD001546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gagne DJ, Malay MB, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL. Bedside diagnostic minilaparoscopy in the intensive care unit. Surgery 2002;131:491–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hackert T, Kienle P, Weitz J, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy for early diagnosis of abdominal complications after cardiac surgery. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1671–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Branicki FJ. Abdominal emergencies: diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy. Surg Infect 2002;3:269–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Szem JW, Hydo LJ, Fischer E, et al. High risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary „road trip“. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1660–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geis WP, Kim HC. Use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with surgical abdominal sepsis. Surg Endosc 1995;9:178–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clary EM, Bruch AM, Lau CL, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic and systemic immunologic responses to peritonitis in pigs. J Surg Res 2002;108:32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sare M, Demirkiran AE, Alibey E, Durmaz B. Effect of abdominal insufflation on bacterial growth in experimental peritonitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11:285–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sare M, Demirkiran AE, Tastekin N, Durmaz B. Effects of laparoscopic models on anaerobic bacterial growth with Bacteroides fragilis in experimentally induced peritonitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003;13:175–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1121–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 1996;224:131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai PB, et al. Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 2001;88:133–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Philip S. Barie MD, MBA, FCCM, FACS (Professor of Surgery)

Authors
  1. Philip S. Barie MD, MBA, FCCM, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery B, Rambam Health Care Campus, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 31906, Israel

    Ahmad Assalia MD (Deputy Director) (Deputy Director)

  2. The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 31906, Israel

    Ahmad Assalia MD (Deputy Director) (Deputy Director)

  3. Division of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Joan and Standford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Mailbox 294, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Michel Gagner MD, FRCSC, FACS (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

  4. Surgical Specialties of Keokuk, 1425 Morgan Street, Keokuk, IA, 52632, USA

    Moshe Schein MD, FACS, FCS (SA) (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

  5. Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, New York

    Moshe Schein MD, FACS, FCS (SA) (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barie, P.S. (2006). Commentary. In: Assalia, A., Gagner, M., Schein, M. (eds) Controversies in Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30964-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30964-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22952-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30964-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation