Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Access to the Abdomen

  • Chapter
Controversies in Laparoscopic Surgery

  • 834 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Karam KS, Hajj SN. Mesenteric hematoma — Meckel’s diverticulum: a rare laparoscopic complication. Fertil Steril 1977;28:1003–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Tebala GD, et al. Routine use of open technique in laparoscopic operations. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:58–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lacey CG. Laparoscopy. A clinical sign for intraperitoneal needle placement. Obstet Gynecol 1976;47:625–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leron E, Piura B, Ohana E, et al. Delayed recognition of major vascular injury during laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;79:91–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Riedel HH, Lehmann WE, Mecke H, et al. The frequency distribution of various laparoscopic operations, including complication rates — statistics of the Federal Republic of Germany in the years 1983–1985. Zentralbl Gynakol 1989;111:78–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Airan MC. Basic techniques. In: McFayden BV, Ponsky JL, editors. Operative laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 93–123.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen DM, Lam AM, Chapman M, Carlton M, Cario GM. Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998;53:167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapron CM, Pierre F, Lacroix S, et al. Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:461–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993;165:9–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasson HM. Modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971;110:886.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasson HM. Open laparoscopy vs. closed laparoscopy: a comparison of complication rates. Adv Plan Parent 1978;13:41–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dingfender JR. Direct laparoscope trocar insertion without prior pneumoperitoneum. J Reprod Med 1978;21:45–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Woolcott R. The safety of laparoscopy performed by direct trocar insertion and carbon dioxide insufflation under vision. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:216–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaller G, Kuenkel M, Manegold BC. The optical „Veress-needle“ — initial puncture with a minioptic. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1995;3:55–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hallfeldt KKJ, Trupka A, Kalteis T, et al. Safe creation of pneumoperitoneum using an optical trocar. Surg Endosc 1999;13:306–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips JM, Hulka JF, Peterson HB; American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 1982 Membership survey. J Reprod Med 1984;29:592–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, et al. Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1997;84:599–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanoski MP, et al. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of defense. Ann Surg 1996;224:145–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, et al. Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 2001;15:566–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaraca F, Catarci M, Gossetti F, et al. Routine use of open laparoscopy: 1,006 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 1999;9:75–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas WEG. Section C. Minimal access surgery. In: Basic surgical skills: a participants’ handbook. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England; 1996. p. 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanney RM, Carmalt HL, Merret N, et al. Use of the Hasson cannula producing major vascular injury at laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1999;13:1238–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garry R. Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 1999;8:315–26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merlin T, Maddern G, Jamieson G, et al. A systematic review of the methods used to establish laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum. ASERNIP-S Report No. 13. Adelaide, South Australia: ASERNIP-S. October 2001. Available from http://www.surgeons.org/asernip-s/systematic_review/MELPreview1001.pdf (cited 30 March 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Centre for Clinical Effectiveness. What is the safety of open versus closed technique for laparoscopy? Melbourne: Southern Health/Monash Instuitute of Public Health; 2001. Available from http://www.med.monash.edu.au/healthservices/cce/evidence/pdf/c/512.pdf (cited 30 March 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1121–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K; Study Group of Endoscopic Surgery in Kyushu, Japan. Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc 1997;11:1198–1201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:478–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, et al. Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:677–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peitgen K, Nimtz K, Hellinger A, et al. Offener zugang oder Veress-nadel bei laparoskopischen eingriffen? Ergebnisse einer prospektiv randomisierten studie. Chirurg 1997;68:910–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cogliandolo A, Manganaro T, Saitta FP, et al. Blind versus open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:353–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bemelman WA, Dunker MS, Busch OR, et al. Efficacy of establishment of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle, Hasson trocar, and modified blunt trocar (TrocDoc): a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2000;10:325–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bernik TR, Trocciola SR, Mayer DA, et al. Balloon blunt-tip trocar for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: improvement over the traditional Hasson and Veress needle methods. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dimick JB, Diener-West M, Lipsett PA. Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature. Equivalency or error? Arch Surg 2001;136:796–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Borgatta L, Gruss L, Barad D, et al. Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle use for laparoscopic sterilization. J Reprod Med 1990;35:891–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, et al. Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:148–150.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Byron JW, Markenson G, Miyazawa K. A randomized comparison of Veress needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;177:259–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Santala M, Jarvela I, Kauppila A. Transfundal insertion of a Veress needle in laparoscopy of obese subjects: a practical alternative. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2277–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Vinh VQ, et al. Clinical experience with an optical access trocar in gynecological laparoscopy-pelviscopy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 1997;1:315–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Marcovich R, Del Terzo MA, Wolf JS. Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques: Optiview visualizing trocar and Veress needle. J Endourol 2000;14:175–179.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. String A, Berber E, Foroutani A, et al. Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2001;15:570–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Natali J. Implications médico-légales des traumatismes vasculaires au cours de la chirurgie vidéo-endoscopique. J Mal Vasc 1996;21:223–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via A. Bosio, 13, 00161, Rome, Italy

    Paolo Gentileschi MD (Assistant Professor of Surgery)

  2. General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Via G. Martinotti, 20, 00135, Rome, Italy

    Marco Catarci MD (Staff Surgeon)

Authors
  1. Paolo Gentileschi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Catarci MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery B, Rambam Health Care Campus, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 31906, Israel

    Ahmad Assalia MD (Deputy Director) (Deputy Director)

  2. The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 31906, Israel

    Ahmad Assalia MD (Deputy Director) (Deputy Director)

  3. Division of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Joan and Standford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Mailbox 294, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Michel Gagner MD, FRCSC, FACS (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

  4. Surgical Specialties of Keokuk, 1425 Morgan Street, Keokuk, IA, 52632, USA

    Moshe Schein MD, FACS, FCS (SA) (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

  5. Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, New York

    Moshe Schein MD, FACS, FCS (SA) (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gentileschi, P., Catarci, M. (2006). Access to the Abdomen. In: Assalia, A., Gagner, M., Schein, M. (eds) Controversies in Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30964-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30964-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22952-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30964-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation