Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Alternative: Faecal Tagging

  • Chapter
Virtual Colonoscopy

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 184:786–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromer MQ, Weinberg DS (2005) Screening for colorectal cancer — now and the near future. Semin Oncol 32:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG et al. (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation feasibility study. Radiology 219:693–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1713–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. Am J Roentgenol 1711:989–995

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2001) Science backgrounder: safety of sodium oral phosphates oral solution. www.fda.gov/cder/drug/safety/sodiumphosphate.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenlon HM (2002) CT colonography: pitfalls and interpretation. Abdom Imaging 27:284–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenlon HM, Nunes DP et al. (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. NEJM 341:1496–1502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrucci J (2005a) CT colonography for detection of colon polyps and cancer. Working group on CT colongraphy. Lancet. 365:1464–1465; author reply 1465–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrucci JT (2005b) Colonoscopy: virtual and optical — another look, another view. Radiology 235:13–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M et al. (2005) CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 15:1192–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw JL, Taylor AJ, Jones DA (2005) Prospective blind trial comparing 45-ml and 90-ml doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation prior to CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 184(s):20

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300–1311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CD, Dachman AH (2000) CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 216:331–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR et al. (1993) A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 88:1218–1223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S (2005) Fast reading of CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 184(s):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefere P, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al. (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results — polyp detection and patient compliance. Radiology 224:393–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M et al. (2004) A method to perform laxative-free CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 183:945–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J et al. (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. Am J Roentgenol 184:1836–1842

    Google Scholar 

  • Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. Am J Roentgenol 176:137–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218:274–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod AJ, Duncan KA, Pearson RH et al. (1998) A comparison of Fleet Phospho-soda with Picolax in the preparation of the colon for double contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 53:612–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB et al. (1999) Virtual colonoscopy: a kinder, gentler colorectal cancer screening test? Lancet 354:1048–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Coster G (1997) Issues in patient compliance. Drugs 54:797–800

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 181:799–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ et al. (2003) Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rex DK (2000) Virtual colonoscopy: time for some tough questions for radiologists and gastroenterologists. Endoscopy 32:260–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V et al. (2003a) Optimizing colonic distention for multi-row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229:99–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V et al. (2003b) Optimizing bowel preparation for multidetector row CT colonography: effect of Citramag and Picolax. Clin Radiol 58:723–732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomeer M, Carbone I, Bosmans H et al. (2003) Stool tagging applied in thin-slice multidetector computed tomography colonography. JCAT 27:132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo TK, DiPalma JA (2001) Review article: colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15:605–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam J, Cotton P, Johnson CD et al. (2004) AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 127:970–984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanner SJ, McDonald PH, Paterson WG et al. (1990) A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 85:422–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zalis ME, Hahn PF (2001) Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 176(3):646–648

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C et al. (2003) CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction — initial observations. Radiology 226:911–917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Bruggesteenweg 90, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium

    Philippe Lefere MD & Stefaan Gryspeerdt MD

Authors
  1. Philippe Lefere MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefaan Gryspeerdt MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Bruggesteenweg 90, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium

    Philippe Lefere MD  & Stefaan Gryspeerdt MD  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lefere, P., Gryspeerdt, S. (2006). The Alternative: Faecal Tagging. In: Lefere, P., Gryspeerdt, S. (eds) Virtual Colonoscopy. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22865-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30904-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation