Advertisement

Embedding Micro Cogeneration in the Energy Supply System

  • Lambert Schneider
  • Martin Pehnt
Chapter
  • 894 Downloads

Keywords

Fuel Cell Wind Power Power Flow Heat Demand Wind Power Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 9: Embedding Micro Cogeneration in the Energy Supply System

  1. Arndt U, Duschl A, Köhler D, Schwaegerl P (2004) Energiewirtschaftliche Bewertung dezentraler KWK-Systeme für die Hausenergieversorgung. Perspektiven einer Wasserstoff-Energiewirtschaft — Teil 5. Wasserstoff-Initiative Bayern (wiba), MünchenGoogle Scholar
  2. BCG (2003) Keeping the lights on. Navigating Choices in European Power Generation. Boston Consulting Group, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehlert T, Bodendieck M (2004) Marktchancen in der Stromerzeugung. Die Sicht des Gasversorgers. Presented at the conference: Marktchancen in der Stromerzeugung. Handlungsoptionen für Stadtwerke und Händler, organized by Enervis, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Casten T (2003) Preventing Blackouts. Whether to Spend or Save our Way out of the Problem. Cogeneration & On-Site Power Production 4(6):24–29Google Scholar
  5. CEIDS (2002) Self-Healing Grid Element program plan, March 2002. Consortium for Electric Infrastructure to Support a Digital Society. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  6. DER (2003) US DoE Office of Distributed Energy Resources, www.eere.energy.gov/de. Last accessed: March 15, 2005Google Scholar
  7. EU (2003) Hydrogen and Fuel cells — a Vision of our Future. High level group Draft report v 4.8. European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission (ed) (2001) Green Paper. Towards a European Strategy for the Security of Energy Supply. LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischedick M, Nitsch J (2002) Langfristszenarien für eine nachhaltige Energieversorgung. Umweltbundesamt, Research Report 20097, 104, Wuppertal StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilles V, Ocran GW, Gray R, Woodbridge D (eds) (2003) German Electricity Wholesale Market. LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilger C (2002) Impact of Decentralized Generation on System Operation. VGB Power Tech 6:53–56Google Scholar
  12. IEA (2002) Distributed Generation in Liberalized Electricity Markets. International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Jarret K, Hedgecock J, Gregory R, Warham T (2004) Technical Guide to the Connexion of Generation to the Distribution Network. Department of Trade and Industry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkins N, Allan R, Kirschen D, Strbac G (2000) Embedded Generation. Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE), LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen J (2002) Integrating CHP and Wind Power. How Western Denmark is leading the way. Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production 3(6):55–62zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kempton W, Tomic J, Letendre S, Brooks A, Lipman T (2001) Vehicle-to-Grid Power: Battery, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles as Resources for Distributed Electric Power in California. University of Delaware, DelawareGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauersen B (2001) District Heating in Denmark — Where Are We Now? Euroheat & Power 4:16–20Google Scholar
  18. Mendez VH, Rivier J, de la Fuente JI, Gomez T, Arceluz J, Marin J (2002): Impact of Distributed Generation on Distribution Losses. Universidad Pontificia Comillas, MadridGoogle Scholar
  19. Mertens F (2004) Integration von Brennstoffzellen in Versorgungsstrukturen. Brennstoffzellen in der Kraft-Wärme-Kopplung. In: Krewitt W, Pehnt M, Fischedick M, Temming H (eds) Erich Schmidt Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Nast M (2003) Nahwärme — ein unverzichtbares Strukturelement. In: Fischedick M, Nitsch J (eds) Langfristszenarien für eine nachhaltige Energienutzung in Deutschland. Umweltbundesamt, Research Report 20097104, Stuttgart WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  21. Öko-Institut (2002) Security of Supply — A Challenge for Energy Policy in Europe. Freiburg Berlin DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  22. Pitz V, Brandl M, Hauptmeier M, Horenkamp W, Lehmer D, Schwan M (2003) Systemtechnische Anforderungen an elektrische Verteilnetze bei flächendeckendem Einsatz dezentraler Energieversorgungsanlagen. Presented at the ETG-ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  23. Rempel H (2000) Geht die Kohlenwasserstoff-Ära zu Ende? Presentation at the DGMK/BGR event: Geowissenschaften für die Exploration und Produktion: Informationsbörse für Forschung und Industrie, Hannover. www.bgr.de/b123/kw_aera/kw_aera.htm. Last accessed: March 15, 2005Google Scholar
  24. Schlemmermeier B (2003) Langfristige Erdgasverstromung. Bestehen Versorgungsrisiken? Symposium of the Gesellschaft für Energiewissenschaft und Energiepolitik (GEE): Langfristige Struktur der Stromversorgung, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Overbeeke F, Roberts V (2002) Active Networks as Facilitators for Embedded Generation. Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production 3(2): 37–42Google Scholar
  26. Varming S, Nielson JE (2004) Review of Technical Options and Constraints for Integration of Distributed Generation in Electricity Networks. Result of the project Sustelnet (Policy and Regulatory Roadmaps for the Integration of Distributed Generation and the Development of Sustainable Electricity Networks). www.sustelnet.net/results.html Last accessed: March 15, 2005Google Scholar
  27. VDEW (2001) Eigenerzeugungsanlagen am Niederspannungsnetz. Richtlinie für Anschluss und Parallelbetrieb von Eigenerzeugungsanlagen am Niederspannungsnetz. Verband der Elektrizitätswirtschaft, Frankfurt HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  28. VDN (2003) Transmission Code 2003. Verband der Netzbetreiber, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lambert Schneider
    • 1
  • Martin Pehnt
    • 2
  1. 1.Öko-Institut - Institute for Applied EcologyBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Energy and Environmental Research IFEUHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations