Variations in Nasopharyngeal Skeletal Architecture

  • Samuel Berkowitz


Soft Palate Cleft Palate Hard Palate Cranial Base Posterior Pharyngeal Wall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dickson DR, Dickson WM. Anatomical and physiological basis of speech. Boston: Little, Brown; 1982.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenberger HC. Growth and development of the naso respiratory area in childhood. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1934; 43:495–522.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brodie AG. On the growth pattern of the human head from the third-month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat 1941; 68:209–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    King EW. A roentgenographic study of pharyngeal growth. Angle Orthod 1952; 22:23–37.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott JH. The cartilage of the nasal septum. Br Dent J 1953; 95:37–43.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott JH. The growth in width of the facial skeleton. Am J Orthod 1957; 43:366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott JH. The analysis of facial growth, Part II: the horizontal and vertical dimensions. Am J Orthod 1958; 44:585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Todd TW, Tracy B. Racial features in the American Negro cranium. Am J Phys Anthropol 1930; 15:53–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Subtelny JD. Width of the nasopharynx and related anatomic structures in normal and unoperated cleft palate children. Am J Orthod 1955; 41:889–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Subtelny JD, Baker HK. The significance of adenoid tissue in velopharyngeal function. Plast Reconstr Surg 1956; 17:235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berkowitz S. Cleft lip and palate. In: Wolfe SA, Berkowitz S, (eds.) Plastic surgery of the facial skeleton. Boston: Little, Brown; 1989. p. 366–371.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ricketts RM. The cranial base and soft structures in cleft palate speech and breathing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1954; 14:47–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brader AC. A cephalometric x-ray appraisal of morphological variations in cranial base and associated pharyngeal structures: implications in cleft palate therapy. Angle Orthod 1957; 27:179–195.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moss ML. Malformation of the skull base associated with cleft palate deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 17:226–234.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coccaro PJ, Subtelny JD, Pruzansky S. Growth of soft palate in cleft palate children. Plast Reconstr Surg 1962; 30:43–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trost-Cardamone JE. Come to terms with VPI: a response to Loney and Bloem. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26:68–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Witt PD, D’Antonio LL. Velopharyngeal insufficiency and secondary palatal management. A new look at an old problem. Clin I Plast Surg 1993; 20:707–721.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Subtelny JD. Width of the nasopharynx and related anatomic structures in normal and unoperated cleft palate children. Am J Orthod 1955; 41:889–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osborne GS. The prevalence of anomalies of the upper cervical vertebrae in patients with craniofacial malformations, and their effects on osseous nasopharyngeal depth. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; 1968. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCarthy MF. Preliminary report of studies on the nasopharynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryng 1925; 34:800–813.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schuller A. X-ray examination of deformities of the nasopharynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryng 1929; 38:108–129.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osborne GS, Pruzansky S, Koepp-Baker H. Upper cervical spine anomalies and osseous nasopharyngeal depth. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 4:14–22.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pruzansky S, Mason R. Morphologic signs of congenital palatopharyngeal incompetence. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association; Nov. 1966; Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slaughter WB, Pruzansky S. The rationale for velar closure as a primary procedure in the repair of cleft palate defects. Plast and Reconstr Surg 1954; 13:341.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warren DW. Velopharyngeal orifice size and upper pharyngeal pressure flow patterns in normal speech. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964; 33:148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warren DW. Velopharyngeal orifice size and upper pharyngeal pressure flow patterns in cleft palate speech, a preliminary study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964:34–15.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bjork L. Velopharyngeal function in connected speech. Acta Radiol 1961; (Suppl):202.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bjork L, Nylan BO. Ceveradiography with synchronized sound spectrum analysis: a study of velopharyngeal function during connected speech in normals and cleft palate cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1961; 27:397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shprintzen RJ, Lewin ML, Craft CB, et al. A comprehensive study of pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate J 1979; 16:46–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Millard DR, Jr. Cleft craft, III: the evolution of its surgery: alveolar and palatal deformities. Boston: Little, Brown; 1980. p. 240.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Millard DR Jr. The island flap in cleft palate surgery. Surg Gynecol and Obstet 1963; 116:297–300.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Trier WC. The pharyngeal flap operation. Clin Plast Surg 1985; 12:697–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Subtelny JD, Nieto RP. A longitudinal study of maxillary growth following pharyngeal-flap surgery. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15:118–.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harding RL. Surgery. In: Copper RL, Harding RL, Krogman WM, Mazahiri M, Millard RT, (eds.) Cleft palate and cleft lip: a team approach to clinical management and rehabilitation of the patient. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1975. p. 5.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Randall P, Whitaker LA, Noone RB, Jones WDF, III. The case for the inferiorly based posterior pharyngeal flap. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15:262–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wolfaardt JF, Wilson FB, Rochet A, McPhee L. An appliance based approach to the management of palatopharyngeal incompetency: a clinical pilot project. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 609:186–195.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mazaheri M, Mazaheri EH. Prosthodontic aspects of velar elevation and velopharyngeal stimulation, presented at the 22nd annual meeting of the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics 1974; Williamsburg, VA.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wardill WEM. Cleft palate. Br J Surg 1933; 21:347.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wardill WEM. The technique of operation for cleft palate. Br J Surg 1937; 25:117–130.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Harding RL, Mazaheri M, Krogman W. Timing of the pharyngeal flap: a retrospective study. Presented at the meeting of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons 1977; Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Orticochea M. Results of the dynamic muscle sphincter operation in cleft palates. Br J Plast Surg 1970; 23:108–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Orticochea M. The dynamic muscle sphincter. In: Bardach J, Morris HL, (eds.) Multidisciplinary management of cleft lip and palate. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 378.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jackson IT: Sphincter pharyngoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1985; 12:711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Denny AD, Marks SM, Oliff-Carneol S. Correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency, by pharyngeal augmentation using autologous cartilage: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J 1993; 30:46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shprintzen RJ, Siegel-Sadewitz VL, Amato J, Goldberg RB. Anomalies associated with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both. Am J Med Genet 1985; 20:585–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sher AE, Shprintzen RJ, Thorpy MJ. Endoscopic observations of obstructive sleep apnea in children with anomalous upper airways: predictive and therapeutic value. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1986; 11:135–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Smith JK, McCabe BF. Teflon injection in the nasopharynx to improve velopharyngeal closure. Ann Otolaryngol 1977; 86:559–563.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Blocksma R. Correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency by Silastic pharyngeal implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963; 31:268–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brauer RO. Retropharyngeal implantation of silicone gel pillows for velopharyngeal incompetence. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51:254–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wolford LM, Oelschlaeger M, Deal R. Proplast as a pharyngeal wall implant to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26:119–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Trigas I, Ysunza A, Gonzales A, Vasquez MD. Surgical treatment of borderline velopharyngeal insufficiency using homologous cartilage implantation with video nasopharyngoscopic monitoring. Cleft Palate J 1988; 25:167–170.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Furlow LT, Block AJ, Williams WN. Obstructive sleep apnea following treatment of velopharyngeal incompetence by Teflon injection. Cleft Palate J 1986; 23:153–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vinas JC, Jager E. The push-forward in velopharyngeal incompetency. In: Hueston JT, (ed.) Transactions of the 5th International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Sydney, Australia: Butterworth; 1971. p. 252–259.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Skolnick ML. Velopharyngeal function in cleft palate. Clin Plast Surg 1975; 2:285–297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Skolnick ML, McCall GN, Barnes M. The sphincteric mechanism of velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J 1973; 10, 286–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Siegel-Sadewitz VL, Shprintzen, RJ. Nasopharyngoscopy of the normal velopharyngeal sphincter: an experiment of biofeedback. Cleft Palate J 1982; 19:196–200.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Functional diagnosis of malocclusion. Transactions of European Orthodontic Society; 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Berkowitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations