Advertisement

Lip and Palate Surgery

  • Samuel Berkowitz

Keywords

Cleft Palate Hard Palate Island Flap Palate Surgery Maxillary Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Enlow DH. Handbook of facial growth. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1982.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Skoog T. Plastic surgery: new methods and refinements. Stockholm: Almgvist-Wiksell International; 1974.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millard DR Jr. Cleft craft: the evolution of its surgery. III: Alveolar and palatal deformities. Boston: Little, Brown; 1980:240.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walker JC Jr, Collioto MB, Mancusi-Ungaro A, Meijer R. Physiological considerations in cleft lip closure. The C-W Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 37:552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bardach J, Eisbach KJ. The influence of primary unilateral cleft lip repair on facial growth: I. Lip pressure. Cleft Palate J 1977; 14:88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bardach J, Klausner EC, Eisbach KJ. The relationship between lip pressure and facial growth and cleft lip repair:An experimental study. Cleft Palate J 1979; 16:37.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bardach J, Mooney M, Giedrojc-Juraha ZL. A comparative study of facial growth following cleft lip repair with or without soft tissue undermining: an experimental study in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69:745–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collito MB. Management of the maxillary segments in complete unilateral cleft lip patients. In: Georgiade NG, Hagerty RF, (eds.) Symposium on management of cleft lip and palate and associated deformities. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1974. p. 58–61.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindsay WK. Von Langenbeck (simple closure) palatoplasty. In: Georgiade NG, Hagerty RF (eds): Symposium on management of cleft lip and palate and associated deformities. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co; 1974. p. 161.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gillies HD. Plastic surgery of the face. London: Frowde; 1920.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veau V. Operative treatment of complete double hare lip. Ann Surg 1922; 29:156.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veau V, Borel S. Division palatine. Paris: Masson & Cie; 1931. p. 35.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wardill WEM. The technique of operation for cleft palate. Br J Surg 1937; 25:117.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dorrance GM. The operative story of cleft palate. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1933.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calnan JS, V-Y pushback. In: Grabb WC, Rosenstein SW, Bzoch KR (eds.) Cleft lip and palate. Boston: Little, Brown; 1971.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kilner T. Cleft lip and palate repair technique. St. Thomas Hosp. 1937; Rep 2:127. Also Marngot R (ed.) Post Graduate Surgery. London: Medical Publications; 1937. p. 2.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Curtin JW. Simultaneous pharyngeal flap and palate repair. In: Georgiade NG, Hagerty RF, (eds.) Symposium on management of cleft lip and palate and associated deformities. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1974. p. 171.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kilner TP. The management of the patient with cleft lip and/or palate. Am J Surg 1958; 93:204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Graber TM. Changing philosophies in cleft palate management. J Pediat 1950; 37:400–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Graber TM. The congenital cleft palate deformity. J Am Dent Assoc 1954; 48:375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Slaughter WB, Brodie AG. Facial clefts and their surgical management. Plast Reconstr Surg 1949; 4:311.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brophy TW. The treatment of congenital cleft palate: A plea for operations in early infancy. Med Rec 1904; 66:75; Trans Am Surg Assoc 1904; 22:122. Br J Child Dis 1904; 1:476.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kremenak CR, Huffman WC, Olin WH. Maxillary growth inhibition by mucoperiosteal denudation of palatal shelf bone in non-cleft beagles. Cleft Palate J 1970; 7:817–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kremenak CR, Searls JC. Experimental manipulation of midfacial growth; a synthesis of five years of research at the Iowa Maxillofacial Growth Laboratory. J Dent Res 1971; 50:1488–1491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kremenak CR Jr. Experimental facial growth perspectives. Presented at the Second International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. (Abstract 127) Toronto, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kremenak CR Jr, Huffman WC, Olin WH. Growth of maxillae in dogs after palatal surgery. Cleft Palate J 1967; 4:6–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kremenak CR, Searls JC, Barrett R. et al. Inhibition of palatal postsurgical wound contraction: Effects of pharmacologic agents. J Dent Res 1976; 55:B297.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Olin W Jr, Morris J, Geil J, Pratt S, Kremenak C. Contraction of mucoperiosteal wounds after palate surgery in beagle pups. (Abstr. 378) J Dent Res 1974; 53 (special issue):149.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morris JM, Kremenak CR. Bibliographic review of wound contraction. MFG reference document 1976B, Maxillofacial Growth Laboratory. Iowa City: University of Iowa; (unpublished photocopy); 1976.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Madden JW, Morton D Jr, Peacock EE Jr. Inhibiting wound contraction by using a topical smooth muscle antagonist. Surgery 1974; 76:8–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Discussion. In: Cole RM (ed.) Early treatment of cleft lip and palate. Proceedings of Second International Symposium, 1969. Chicago: Cleft Lip and Palate Institute, Northwestern University Dental School 1969; 19–20.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pruzansky S. Description, classification, and analysis of unoperated clefts of the lip and palate. Am J Orthod 1953; 39:590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pruzansky S. Factors determining arch form in clefts of the lip and palate. Am J Orthod 1955; 41:827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pruzansky S. Monitoring growth of the infant with cleft lip and palate. Transactions of the Third International Congress, European Orthodontic Society 1973. London: European Orthodontic Soc 1974. p. 538–546.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gillies HD, Fry WK. A new principle in the surgical treatment of “congenital cleft palate” and its mechanical counterpart. Br Med J 1921; 1:335.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Slaughter WB, Pruzansky S. The rationale for velar closure as a primary procedure in the repair of cleft palate defects. Plast and Reconstr Surg 1954; 13:341.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Robertson NRE, Jollys A. Effects of early bone grafting in complete clefts of lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42:414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hotz M. Aims and possibilities of pre-and postsurgical orthopedic treatment in uni-and bilateral clefts. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1973; 553–558.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schweckendiek W. Primary veloplasty: Long-term results without maxillary deformity. A twenty-five year report. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15:268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dorf SD, Curtin JW. Early cleft palate repair and speech outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 70:74–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bzoch KR. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1979.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Blocksma R, Leuz CA, Beernink JH. A study of deformity following cleft repair in patients with normal lip and alveolus. Cleft Palate J 1975: 12:390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lindsay WK. Von Langenbeck palatorrhaphy. In: Grabb WC, Rosenstein SW, Bzoch KR, (eds.) Cleft lip and palate: surgical, dental and speech aspects. Boston: Little, Brown; 1971. p. 393.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kaplan I, Labandter H, Ben-Basset M, Dressner J, Nachmani A. A long-term follow up of clefts of the secondary palate repaired by von Langenbeck’s method. Br J Plast Surg 1978; 31:353–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Krause CJ, Thorp RE, Morris HL. A comparative study of the results of the von Langenback and the V-Y pushback palatoplasties. Cleft Palate J 1976; 13:11–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Musgrave RH, McWilliams BJ, Matthews HP. A review of two different surgical procedures for the repair of clefts of the soft palate only. Cleft Palate J 1975; 12:281–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dryer TM, Trier WC. A comparison of palatoplasty techniques. Cleft Palate J 1984; 21:251–253.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jolleys A. A review of the results of operations on cleft palate with reference to maxillary growth and speech function. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 7:229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Koberg W, Koblin I. Speech development and maxillary growth in relation to technique and timing at palatoplasty. J Maxillofac Surg 1973; 1:44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Friede H, Lilja J, Johnson B. Cleft lip and palate treatment with delayed closure of the hard palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 14:49–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Berkowitz S. Timing cleft palate closure-age should not be the sole determinant. In: Cohen MM Jr, Rollnick BR (eds.) J Craniofac Gen and Dev Biol 1985; 1 (Suppl.):69–83.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24:54–63.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    van Demark DR, Morris HL. Predictive variables for articulation skills of cleft palate speakers. (In prep.)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    McWilliams BJ, Morris HL, Shelton RL. Cleft palate speech. Philadelphia: BC Decker. p. 1984:285–286.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mapes A, Mazaheri M, Harding R, Meier J, Canter H. A longitudinal analysis of the maxillary growth increments of cleft lip and palate patients (CLP). Cleft Palate J 1974; 11:450–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Robertson NRE, Fish J. Early dimensional changes in the arches of cleft palate children. Am J Orthod 1975; 67:290–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Berkowitz S, Krischer J, Pruzansky S. Quantitative analysis of cleft palate cast — a geometric study. Cleft Palate J 1974; 11:134–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bardach J. Cleft palate repair: Two flap palatoplasty, research philosophy, technique and results. In: Bardach J, Morris HL (eds.) Multidisciplinary management of cleft lip and palate. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 352.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Latham R, Burston WR. The effect of unilateral cleft of the lip and palate on maxillary growth pattern. Br J Plast Surg 1964; 17:10–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Latham RA. The septopremaxillary ligament and maxillary development. J Anat 1969; 104:584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Latham RA. Orthopaedic advancement of the cleft maxillary segment: A preliminary report. Cleft Palate J 1980; 17:227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Calabrese CT, Winslow RB, Latham RA. Altering the dimensions of the canine face by the induction of new bone formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 54:467–470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Viteporn S, Ememark H, Melsen B. Postnatal craniofacial skeletal development following a pushback operation of patients with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28:392–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dahl E, Hanusardottir B, Bergland O. A comparison of occlusions in two groups of children whose clefts were repaired by three different surgical procedures. Cleft Palate J 1981; 18:122–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Prysdo V, Holm PC, Dahl E, Fogh-Andersen P. Bone formation in palatal clefts subsequent to palato-vomer plasty: influence on transverse maxillary growth. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 8:73–78.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24:71–77.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Weil J. Orthopedic growth guidance and stimulation for patients with cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 21:57–63.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Krogman WM, Mazaheri M, Harding RL, et al. A longitudinal study of the craniofacial growth pattern in children with clefts as compared to normal birth to six years. Cleft Palate J 1975; 12:59–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cooper HK, Harding RL, Krogman WM, Mazaheri M, Millard RT. Cleft palate and cleft lip: a team approach to clinical management and rehabilitation of the patient. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1979.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Peterson-Falzone SJ, Hardin-Jones MA, Karnell MP. Cleft palate speech. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 123–147.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pruzansky S. Discussion. In: Cole RM, (ed.) Early treatment of cleft lip and palate: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, 1969. Chicago: Cleft Palate Institute, Northwestern University; 1969. p. 166.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    LaRossa D. The state of the art in cleft palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37:225–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28:1–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP team. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1991; 28:22–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Semb G, Shaw WC. Pharyngeal flap and facial growth. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27:217–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Abyholm FE, Bergland O, Semb G. Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. A surgical/orthodontic treatment enabling a non-prosthodontic rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients. Scand J Reconstr Surg 1981; 15:127.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lindsay WK. Clinics in plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1975. p. 309.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Edwards M, Watson ACH. Primary surgery. In: Advances in the management of cleft palate. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1980. p. 151.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    McNeil CK. Orthodontic procedures in the treatment of congenital cleft palate. Dental Rec 1950; 70:126–132.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Berkowitz S, Duncan R, Evans C, Friede H, Kuijpers-Jagtman A, Prahl-Anderson B, Rosenstein S. Timing of cleft palate closure should be based on the ratio of the area of the cleft to that of the palatal segments and not on the age alone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115(6) (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Berkowitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations