Advertisement

Quality Management in Radiotherapy

  • Guenther H. Hartmann
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Keywords

International Atomic Energy Agency Ionization Chamber Treatment Planning System Quality Management System Quality Audit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association of Physics in Medicine (1984) Physical aspects of quality assurance in radiation therapy. Report series no. 13. American Institute of Physics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. American Association of Physics in Medicine (1994a) Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology. Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys 21:581–618Google Scholar
  3. American Association of Physics in Medicine (1994b) Code of practice for accelerators. Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 45 Med Phys 21:1093–1121Google Scholar
  4. American Association of Physics in Medicine (1999) Task Group 51. Protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys 26:1847–1870Google Scholar
  5. American National Standards Institute (1974) Guidelines for maintaining Co-60 and Cs-137 teletherapy equipment. Report no. 449. American National Standards Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  6. American National Standards Institute (1978) Procedures for periodic inspection of Co-60 and Cs-137 teletherapy equipment. Report no. 449.1. American National Standards InstituteGoogle Scholar
  7. Brahme A, Chavaudra J, Landberg T, McCullough E, Nüsslin F, Rawlinson A, Svensson G, Svensson H (1988) Accuracy requirements and quality assurance of external beam therapy with photons and electrons. Acta Oncol 27(Suppl 1)Google Scholar
  8. Deutsches Institut für Normung (1997) Dosismessverfahren nach der Sondenmethode für Photonen-und Elektronenstrahlung, Teil 2: Ionisationsdosimetrie. Deutsche Norm DIN 6800-2, Deutsches Institut für Normung, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobbs H, Thwaites DI (1999) Quality assurance and its conceptual framework. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, UK, Chap. 1Google Scholar
  10. Dutreix A (1984) When and how can we improve precision in radiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 2:275–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (2004) Quality assurance of treatment planning systems: practical examples for external photon beams. ESTRO, Brussels, booklet no. XGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, Kutcher G, Starkschall G, Stern R, Van Dyk J (1998) American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys 25:1773–1836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology (1996) The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for X-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu; 10-300 kV generating potential). Phys Med Biol 41:2605–2625Google Scholar
  14. International Atomic Energy Agency (1999) Standardized quality audit procedures for on-site dosimetry visits to radiotherapy hospitals. IAEA DMRP-199907-IU. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  15. International Atomic Energy Agency (2000a) Lessons learned from accidental exposures in radiotherapy. Safety Reports Series no. 17. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  16. International Atomic Energy Agency (2000b) Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Technical report series no. 398. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  17. International Atomic Energy Agency (2004) Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized treatment planning. Technical Report Series no. 430. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  18. International Commission on Radiological Units and Measuremenets (1976) Determination of dose in a patient irradiated by beams of X or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures. ICRU report 24. ICRU, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  19. International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements (2001) Dosimetry of high-energy photon beams based on standards of absorbed dose to water. ICRU report 64. J ICRU 1Google Scholar
  20. International Electrotechnical Commission (1989a) Medical electrical equipment: medical electron accelerators — functional performance characteristics. IEC 976. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  21. International Electrotechnical Commission (1989b) Medical electrical equipment: medical electron accelerators in the range 1 MeV to 50 MeV — guidelines for performance characteristics. IEC 977. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  22. International Organisation for Standardization (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  23. Leer JW, Corver R, Kraus JJ, Togt JC, Buruma OJ (1995) A quality assurance system based on ISO standards: experience in a radiotherapy department. Radiother Oncol 35:75–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leer JW, McKenzie AL, Scalliet P, Thwaites DI (1998) Practical guidelines for the implementation of a quality system in radiotherapy. European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncolgy. Physics for Clinical Radiotherapy, booklet no. 4. ESTRO, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayles WPM, Lake R, McKenzie A, Macaulay EM, Morgan HM, Jordan TJ, Powley SK (eds) (1999) Physics aspects of quality control in radiotherapy. IPEM report 81. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. McKenzie A, Kehoe T, Thwaites DI (2000) Quality assurance in radiotherapy physics. In: Williams JR, Thwaites DI (eds) Radiotherapy physics in practice. Oxford Medical Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Mijnheer B, Battermann J, Wambersie A (1987) What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy. Radiother Oncol 8:237–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nederlandse Commissie voor Stralingsdosimetrie (1997) Dosimetry of low and medium energy X-rays, a code of practice for use in radiotherapy and radiobiology, report NCS-10. NCS, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  29. Nederlandse Commissie voor Stralingsdosimetrie (2003) Quality assurance of 3-D treatment planning systems; practical guidelines for acceptance testing, commissioning, and periodic quality control of radiation therapy treatment planning systems. The Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry. Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  30. Nordic Association of Clinical Physics (1980) Procedures in external radiation therapy dosimetry with electron and photon beams with maximum energies between 1 and 50 MeV. Acta Radiol Oncol 19:55–79Google Scholar
  31. Podgorsak EB (ed) (2003) Review of radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Educational Reports Series. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaw JE (ed) (1996) A guide to commissioning and quality control of treatment planning systems. IPEM report 68. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, UKGoogle Scholar
  33. SSRPM Report 7 (1997) Quality control of treatment planning systems for teletherapy. Swiss Society for Radiobiology and Medical Physics: ISBN 3-908125-23-5Google Scholar
  34. Thwaites D, Scalliet P, Leer JW, Overgaard J (1995) Quality assurance in radiotherapy. European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Advisory Report to the Commission of the European Union for the Europe Against Cancer Programme. Radiother Oncol 35:61–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Dyk J (ed) (1999) Radiation oncolgy overview. In: The modern technology for radiation oncology: a compendium for medical physicists and radiation oncologists. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Dyk J, Purdy J (1999) Clinical implementation of technology and the quality assurance process. In: Van Dyk J (ed) The modern technology for radiation oncology: a compendium for medical physicists and radiation oncologists. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 19–52Google Scholar
  37. Van Dyk J, Barnett RB, Cygler JE, Shragge PC (1993) Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26:261–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Venselaar JLM, Welleweerd J (2001) Application of a test package in an intercomparison of the performance of treatment planning systems used in a clinical setting. Radiother Oncol 60:203–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wizenberg MJ (ed) (1982) Quality assurance in radiation therapy: a manual for technologists. American College of Radiology, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  40. World Health Organization (1988) Quality assurance in radiotherapy. WHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guenther H. Hartmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Physics in RadiotherapyDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations