Skip to main content

Abstract

A common type of machine tool in durable goods manufacturing industries until recently was a dedicated machine tool (DMT). The roots of these machines go back to the early days of mass production in the automobile industry in the 1920’s. For the sake of operational efficiency, manufacturing process was divided into the smallest possible tasks and then carried out by specialized machines (stations). Since the machines were dedicated to a particular task, it was possible to employ hard automation, a key enabler in high-volume, low mix, and highly repetitive manufacturing. The dedicated machines still constitute majority of the legacy manufacturing systems, which continue to be in operation today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Koren, Y. et al., 1999, “Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 48/2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ramesh, M., Yip-Hoi, D., Dutta, D., Koren, Y., 2000, “A Framework for Comparison of Mechanical Parts,” Proc. 2000 Intl. CIRP Design Seminar, design with Manufacturing: Intelligent Design Concepts, Methods, and Algorithms, May 16-18, Haifa, Israel

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ling, C., Son, S.-Y., Olsen, T., Yip-Hoi, D., 1999, “A System Level Process Planner for Reconfigurable Machining Systems,” ERC/RMS TR-024-99

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moon, Y.-M., Kota, S., 1999, “A Methodology for Automated design of Reconfigurable Machine ools: Proc. 32nd CIRP Intl. Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, pp. 297–303, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katz, R., Chung, H., 2000, “Design of an Experimental Reconfigurable Machine Tool,” Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Ann Arbor, MI, July 23–26, p. 269–274

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spicer, P., Koren, Y., Shpitalni, M., Yip-Hoi, D., 2002, “Design Principles for Machining System Configurations,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 51, No. 1, p.275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spicer, P., Yip-Hoi, D., Koren, Y., 2005, “Scalable Reconfigurable Equipment Design Principles,” International Journal of Production Research (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pasek, Z. J., Ulsoy, A. G., Koren, Y., “Critical Issues in Development of Open Architecture Controllers,” SAE-IPC Conference and Expo, Detroit, MI, May 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katz, R., Min, B.-K., Pasek, Z., 2000, “Open Architecture Control Technology Trends,” ERC/RMS Technical Report TR-035-00, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  10. Landers, R., Min, B.-K., 2001, “Development of a Prototype Reconfigurable Machine Tool,” lst Intl. Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Ann Arbor, MI, May 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  11. Min, B.-K, Huang, Z., Pasek, Z., Yip-Hoi, D., Husted, F., and Marker, S., 2002, “Integration of Real-Time Control Simulation to a Virtual Manufacturing Environment,” International Journal of Agile Manufacturing, Vol. 1/1, p. 67–87

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yun, W.-S., Min, B.-K, Pasek, Z. J., 2005, “Interface Implementation of Open Architecture Controllers for Machine Tools and Its Applications,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lian, F.-L., Moyne, J., and Tilbury, M., 2001, “Performance Evaluation of Control Networks: Ethernet, ControlNet, and DeviceNet,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 21(1), p. 66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, H., Landers, R., Kota, S., “A Review of Feasible Joining Methods for Reconfigurable Machine Tools Components,” Proc. 2000 Japan-USA Symp. On Flexible Automation, July 23–26, 2000, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn, K.-G, Min, B.-K, Pasek, Z.J., 2005, “Modeling and Compensation of Geometric Errors in Simultaneous Cutting Using a Multispindle Machine Tool,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Segall, S., Upatnieks, J., 2000, “Integration of Optical Sensors into a Reconfigurable Machining Module,” Proc. 2000 Japan-USA Symp. On Flexible Automation, July 23–26, 2000, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pasek, Z. (2006). Challenges in the Design of Reconfigurable Machine Tools. In: Dashchenko, A.I. (eds) Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems and Transformable Factories. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29397-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29397-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29391-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-29397-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics