Reconfigurable Machine Tool Design

  • Y. M. Moon


In today’s competitive markets, manufacturing systems must quickly respond to changing customer demands and ever-shorter product life cycles. Traditional transfer lines are designed for high volume production and operate in a fixed automation paradigm. They cannot, therefore, accommodate changes in the product design. On the other hand, conventional CNC-based “flexible” manufacturing systems may offer flexibility, but are generally slow and expensive because they are not optimized for any particular product or a family of products.


Machine Tool Dynamic Stiffness Dual Vector Material Handling System Reconfigurable Manufacture System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Bollinger and et. al., 1998, Visionary Manufacturing Challenges for 2020, Washington DC, USA, National Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritchow, G., Van Brussel, H., Ulsoy, A.G., 1999, “Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems,” CIRP Annals, Vol. 48, No. 2, (keynote paper).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Moon, S., Moon, Y., and Kota, S., 2001, “Screw theory based metrology for design and error compensation of machine tools”, DAC21083, ASME / DETC Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, Sep. 2001.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Moon, Y., 2000, Reconfigurable Machine Tool Design: Theory and Application, PhD. Thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Moon, Y., and Kota, S., 1999, “A Methodology for Automated Design of Reconfigurable Machines”, In Proceedings of the 32nd CIRP Int. Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 297–303.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Moon, Y., and Kota, S., 2000, “Synthesis of Reconfigurable Machine Tools with Screw Theory”, MECH-14066, ASME / DETC Mechanism Design and Robotics Conference, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Moon, Y., and Kota, S., 2002, “Design of Reconfigurable Machine Tools”, ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp. 480–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Moon, Y., and Kota, S., 2002, “Generalized Kinematic Modeling Method for Reconfigurable Machine Tools”, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 124, pp. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Moon, Y., and Kota, S., 2002, “Automated Synthesis of Mechanisms Using DualVector Algebra”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 37, pp. 143–166.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shinno, H., and Ito, Y., 1981, “Structural Description of Machine Tools (2nd report, Evaluation of Structural Similarity)”, Bulletin of JSME, Vol. 24, No. 187, pp. 259–265.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Shinno, H., and Ito, Y., 1984, “A Proposed Generating Method for the Strucutral Configuration of Machine Tools”, ASME paper 84-WA/Prod-22.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Shinno, H., and Ito, Y., 1987, “Computer Aided Concept Design for Structural Configuration of Machine Tools: Configuration Design Using Direct Graph”, Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, Vol. 109, pp. 327–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Yan, H.-S. and Chen, F.-C., 1998, Configuration synthesis of machining centers without tool changers, Mech. Mach. Theory, Vol. 33, No. 1/2, pp. 197–212.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Yan, H.-S., and Chen, F.-C., l998, “Configuration Synthesis of Machining Centers without Tool Change Arms”, Mech. Mach. Theory, Vol. 33, No. ½, pp. 197–212.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Yan, H.-S., and Hwang, Y.-W., 1991. “The Specialization of Mechanisms”, Mech. Mach. Theory, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. M. Moon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations