Real Options: an Application to RMS Investment Evaluation

  • M. Amico
  • F. Asl
  • Z. Pasek
  • G. Perrone


Market globalization and aggressive economic competition are driving a trend in manufacturing toward the adoption of flexibility features in order to better react to changes related to customer needs, process technologies, government directives, etc. Wide-ranging research efforts have been carried out in order to understand which of these flexibility features are critical in achieving the particular business tasks and how or when to implement them. Flexibility can be purchased through special features in capital equipment, and it can take a form of flexible manufacturing equipment, options to change the product mix, and the opportunity to temporarily shut down and restart production systems. Flexibility also includes options to switch production across various plant locations, depending on labor conditions, demand and currency fluctuations. Therefore, flexibility allows the management to take advantage of the outcomes better than expected and at the same time to reduce the losses. This capability must add a value to the investment project having such embedded options. (Bengtsson 2001).


Payoff Function Real Option Product Family Demand Forecast Geometric Brownian Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Bengtsson J (2001) Manufacturing flexibility and real options: A review. International Journal of Production Economics 74:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Koren Y, Heisel, Jovane F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. Annals of the CIRP 48/2, Keynote PaperGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Spicer P, Koren Y, Yip-Hoi D, Novak J, Bandyopadhyay P (2002) Scalable Machining System Design and Case Study Analysis. Global Powertrain Congress, August 2002, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Miller TL, Park CS (2002) Decision Making Under Uncertainty-Real Options to the Rescue?. The Engineering Economist 47:105–150Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Amram M, Kulatilaka N (1999) Real options: managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Yeo KT, Qiu F (2003) The value of management flexibility – a real option approach to investment evaluation. International Journal of Project Management 21:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Trigeorgis L (1991) A Log-Transformed Binomial Numerical Analysis Method for Valuing complex Multi-Option Investments. Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis 26:309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Amico M, Pasek Z, Asl F, Perrone G (2003) A New Methodology to Evaluate the Real Options of an Investment Using Binomial Trees and Montecarlo Simulation. Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, December 2003, New Orleans, Louisiana, USGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hull JC (2002) Options, Futures and other Derivatives. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Amico M, Bruccoleri M, Lo Nigro G, Noto La Diega S, Perrone G (2001) A set of optimization models for making investment decisions in manufacturing enterprises. Proceedings of the 1st CIRP International Conference on Agile, Reconfigurable Manufacturing, May 2001, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Son SY, Olsen TL, Yip-Hoi D (2000) Economic Benefits of Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. Proceedings of the 2000 Japan USA Flexible Automation Conference, July 2000, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bjork T (1998) Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Amico M, Asl F, Pasek Z (2003) Using Real Options in Production System Investments. Proceedings of the 6th A.I.Te.M. International Conference, September 2003, Gaeta, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Brandimarte P (2001) Numerical methods in finance: a MATLAB-based introduction. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Perrone G, Noto La Diega S (1999) A Reference Scenario for IMS Strategic Design. Annals of the CIRP 48/1:381–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Amico
  • F. Asl
  • Z. Pasek
  • G. Perrone

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations