Economical Models for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

  • M. Bruccoleri
  • G. Perrone


Dedicated manufacturing lines (DML), flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) and reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) are, nowadays, the three production paradigms representing three ways of thinking and implementing production systems. Nevertheless, very few researches aim at clearly defining the convenience of such three manufacturing paradigms with regards to the market and competition characteristics in which the company plans to play. This chapter goes toward such a direction; in particular, an investment model for each kind of manufacturing system (DML, FMS, RMS) is proposed; these models are able to consider several market and competition issues such as product demand dynamic over the investment period, the possibility of several production mix composition, products direct costs and prices and so forth. The comparison of the manufacturing system configurations coming out from the optimization of the proposed models, allows to build up a general understanding about the field of economic convenience of each manufacturing system typology.


Investment Cost Flexible Manufacturing System Reconfigurable Manufacturing System Scope Economy Flexible Machine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Babic, B., 1999, “Axiomatic Design of Flexible Manufacturing Systems”, vol. 37, 1159–1173.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Chryssolouris, G., 1996, “Flexibility and Its Measurement,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 47/1, 369–372.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    De Meyer, A., Nakane, J., Ferdows, K., 1989, “Flexibility: the Next Competitive Battle – the Manufacturing Futures Survey,” Strategic Management Journal, 10, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Fine, C. H., Freund R. M., 1990, “Optimal Investment in Product-Flexible Manufacturing Capacity,” Management Science, 36 (4), 449–464.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Gerwin, D., 1992, “Manufacturing Flexibility: A Strategic Perspective,” Management Science, 39 (4), 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., Van Brussel, H., 1999, “Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 48/2, Keynote Paper.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Naik B., Chakravarty, A. K., 1992, “Strategic Acquisition of New Manufacturing Technology: a Review and Research Framework,” Intl. Journal of Production Research, vol. 30(7).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Perrone, G. Noto La Diega, S., 1999, “A Reference Scenario for IMS Strategic Design,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 48/1, 381–384.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Price, D.H.R., Beach, R., Muhlemann, A.P., Sharp, J.A., Paterson, A., 1998, “A System to Support the Enhancement of Strategic Flexibility in Manufacturing Enterprises,” European Journal of Operations Research, 109: 362–376.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Sethi, A. K., Sethi, S. P., 1990, “Flexibility in Manufacturing: A Survey,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 2, 289–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Shewchuk J. P., 1999, “A Set of Flexibility Measures for Manufacturing Applications”, Intl. Journal of Production Research, vol. 37, 3017–3042.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Bruccoleri
  • G. Perrone

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations