Abstract
In order to study neuronal basis to extract Angles and junctions embedded within contours, we conducted extracellular recordings, while two macaque monkeys performed the fixation task. Angle stimuli were the combination of two straight half lines. Each line was drawn from the center to outside the classical receptive fields in one of 12 directions. In the superficial layer of area V2, 91 out of 114 neurons showed selective responses to these angle stimuli. Of these, 41 neurons (36%) showed selective responses to wide angles between 60° and 150°, which were distinct from responses to straight lines or sharp angles (30°). When we tested these neurons’ selectivity to the 12 individual half lines, the preferred directions were more or less consistent with one or two components of the optimal angle stimuli. These results suggest that the angle selectivity in area V2 was largely dependent on the representation of individual line components. We suggest that area V2 is the first step to extract information of angles embedded within contour stimuli.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allman J, Miezin F, and McGuinnes E (1985) Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Ann Rev Neurosci 8:406–430.
Gilbert CD, Ito M, Kappadia M, Westheimer G (2000) Vision Res 40:1217–1226
Ito M, Komatsu H (2004) J Neuorsci 24:3313–3324
Kobatake E, Tanaka K (1994) J Neurophysiol 71:856–867
Heider B, Meskenaite V, Peterhans E (2000) Eur J Neurosci 12:4117–4130
Hegde J, Van Essen DC (2000) J Neurosci 20:RC61:1–6
Anzai A, Van Essen DC (2001) Soc Neurosci Abstr 31, #286.5.
Shevelev IA, Lazareva NA, Novikova RV, Tikhomirov AS, Sharaev GA (1994) Neuorsci 61:965–973
Ito M, Komatsu H (2004) Soc Neurosci Abstr 35, #370.3
Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN (1989) J Neurosci 9:2432–2442
Ts’o DY, Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN (1986) J Neurosci 6:1160–1170
Ts’o DY, Gilbert CD (1988) J Neurosci 8:1712–1727
Tamura H, Sato H, Katsuyama N, Hata Y, Tsumoto T (1996) Eur J Neurosci 8:300–309
von der Heydt R, Peterhans E (1989) J Neurosci 9:1731–1748
Zhou H, Friedman HS, von der Heydt R (2000) J Neurosci 20:6594–6611
Bakin JS, Nakayama K, Gilbert CD (2000) J Neurosci 20:8188–8198
Xiao D-K, Raiguel S, Marcar V, Koenderink J, Orban GA (1995) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:11303–11306
Walker GA, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1999) J Neurosci 19:10536–10553.
Jones HE, Grieve KL, Wang W, Sillito AM (2001) J Neurophysiol 86:2011–2028
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ito, M. (2006). How the early visual system extract angles and junctions embedded within contour stimuli?. In: Murase, K., Sekiyama, K., Naniwa, T., Kubota, N., Sitte, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Autonomous Minirobots for Research and Edutainment (AMiRE 2005). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29344-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29344-2_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28496-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-29344-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)