Skip to main content

Dilemmas in factory design: paradox and paradigm

  • Chapter
Stochastic Modeling of Manufacturing Systems
  • 1211 Accesses

Abstract

The problems of factory design are notorious for their complexity. It is argued in this paper that factory design problems represent a class of problems for which there are crucial dilemmas and correspondingly deep-seated underlying paradoxes. These paradoxes, however, give rise to novel paradigms which can bring about fresh approaches as well as insights into their solution.

I would like to thank the referees for their insights and suggestions and pointing out some problems in earlier drafts. My approach to factory design has evolved over the years, and is still evolving, and it is largely due to the influence of Professor Horst Rittel, my professor at the University of California at Berkeley during my formative undergraduate days, who instilled much of the basis of this philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Checkland P (1984) Rethinking a systems approach. In: Tomlnson R, Kiss I (eds) Rethinking the process of operational research and systems analysis, pp 43–65. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook SA (1971) The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. Proc. of the Third ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp 4–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeGrace P, Stahl L (1990) Wicked problems, righteous solutions. Yourden Press Computing Series, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dixon JR, Poli C (1995) Engineering design and design for manufacturing. Field Stone, Conway, MA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Science 50(2): 159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Funk, Wagnalis (1968) Standard college dictionary. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hillier F, Lieberman G (2001) Introduction to operations research. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopp W, Spearman M (1996) Factory physics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karp RM (1972) Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller RE, Thatcher JW (eds) Complexity of computer computations. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karp RM (1975) On the computational complexity of combinatorial problems. Networks 5: 45–68

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnamoorthy MS, Deo N (1979) Complexity of minimum-dummy-activities problem in a PERT network. Networks 9: 189–194

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kunz W, Rittel H (1970) Issues as elements of information systems. Institute for Urban and Regional Development, Univeristy of California, Berkeley, Working Paper No. 131

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rittel H (1968) Lecture notes for arch, vol 130. Unpublished, Department of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rittel H (1972a) On the planning crisis: systems analysis of the “first and second generations”. Bedrifts Okonomen 8: 390–396

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rittel H (1972b) Structure and usefulness of planning information systems. Bedrifts Okonomen (8): 398–401

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rittel H (1975) On the planning crisis: systems analysis of the first and second generations. Reprinted from: Bedrifts ØKonmen, No. 8, October 1972; Reprint No. 107, Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts N (2001) Coping with wicked problems: the case of Afghanistan. Learning from International Public Management Forum, vol 11B, pp 353–375. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson D, et al. (1999) Achange proposal for small-scale renovation and construction projects. Project Team Report. Internal University of Massachusetts Report. Campus Committee for Organization Restructuring, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw GB (1946) The doctors dilemma. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith J MacGregor, Larson RJ, MacGilvary DF (1976) Trial court facility. National Clearinghouse for Criminal Justice Planning and Architecture, Monograph B5. In: Guidelines for the planning and design of state court programs and facilities. University of Illinois, Champaign, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, J.M. (2006). Dilemmas in factory design: paradox and paradigm. In: Liberopoulos, G., Papadopoulos, C.T., Tan, B., Smith, J.M., Gershwin, S.B. (eds) Stochastic Modeling of Manufacturing Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29057-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics