Skip to main content

Summary

In this chapter the importance of meticulous bone preparation of the acetabulum and the optimal cement mantle in the socket are outlined with a discussion of all relevant literature. It is recommended to partially preserve the subchondral bone plate of the acetabular roof, but to open the cancellous spaces for cement interdigitation with a combination of reaming, multiple drill holes and copious pulsatile lavage. The cement mantle should be a least 2—3 mm with further cement interdigitation into the roof (Zone I) to prevent radiolucent lines, which are associated with a higher risk of failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson GB et al. (1972) Loosening of the cemented acetabular cup in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 54:590–599

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry DJ et al. (2002) Twenty-five year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charnley J (1979) Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Theory and practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sokets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Della Valle CJ et al. (2004) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flanged, cemented all-polyethylene acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 19:23–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eftekhar NS, Nercessian O (1988) Incidence and mechanism of failure of cemented acetablar components in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 19:557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Cimbrelo E et al. (1997) Progression of radiolucent lines adjacent to the acetabular component and factors influencing migration after Charnley low-friction total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79:1373–1380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacob HA et al. (1976) Mechanical function of subchondral bone as experimentally determined on the acetabulum of the human pelvis. J Biomech 9:625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi S et al. (1994) Risk factors affecting radiological failure of the socket in primary Charnley low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 306:84–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mburu G et al. (1999) Optimizing the configuration of cement keyholes for acetabular fixation in total hip replacement using Taguchi experimental design. Proc Instn mech Engrs 213:485–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mootanah R et al. (2000) Fixation of the acetabular cup in cemented total hip replacement: Improving the anchorage hole profile using finite element method. Technology Health Care 8:343–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ranawat CS et al. (1988) Effect of modern cement technique on acetabular fixation total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 19:599–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranawat CS et al. (1995) Prediction of the long-term durability of all-polyethylene cemented sockets. Clin Orthop 317:89–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ranawat CS et al. (1997) Fixation of the acetabular component. Clin Orthop 344:207–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ritter MA et al. (1999) Radiological factors influencing femoral and acetabular failure in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81-B:982–986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vasu R et al. (1982) Stress distribution in the acetabular region before and after total joint replacement. J Biomech 31:133

    Google Scholar 

  17. Welch RB, Charnley J (1970) Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop 72:22–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Askew MJ et al. (1984) Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on PMMA fixation. J Orthop Res 1:412–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia-Cimbrelo E et al. (1997) Progression of radiolucent lines adjacent to the acetabular component and factors influencing migration after Charnley low-friction total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79:1373–1380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huiskes R, Sloof TJ (1981) Thermal injuriy of cancellous bone following pressurized penetration of acrylic cement. Trans Orthop Res Soc 6:134

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jasty M et al. (1991) The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:551–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Joshi RP et al. (1998) Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80:585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi S et al. (1994) Risk factors affecting radiological failure of the socket in primary Charnley low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 306:84–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krause WR et al. (1982) Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop 163:290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malchau H, Herberts P (1998) Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Noble PC, Swarts E (1983) Penetration of acrylic bone cements into cancellous bone. Acta Orthop Scand 54:566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ranawat CS et al. (1988) Effect of modern cement technique on acetabular fixation total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 19:599–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranawat CS et al. (1995) Prediction of the long-term durability of all-polyethylene cemented sockets. Clin Orthop 317:89–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ranawat CS et al. (1997) Fixation of the acetabular component. Clin Orthop 344:207–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ritter MA et al. (1999) Radiological factors influencing femoral and acetabular failure in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81-B:982–986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schulte KR et al. (1993) The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75-A:961–975

    Google Scholar 

  15. Walker PS et al. (1984) Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 185:155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wroblewski BM et al. External wear of the polyethylene socket in cemented THA. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69:61–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parsch, D., Breusch, S.J. (2005). Acetabulum. In: The Well-Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28924-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28924-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24197-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28924-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics