This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Abels G, Bora A (2004) Demokratische Technikbewertung. Bielefeld
Black J (2001) Proceduralizing Regulation: Part II, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21: 33–58
Bodmer W (1985) Public Understanding of Science. Royal Society, London
Bora A (1996) Inklusion und Differenzierung. Bedingungen und Folgen der „Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung“ im Recht. In: van den Daele W, Neidhardt F (eds) Kommunikation und Entscheidung. Berlin, pp 371–406
Bora A (1999) Differenzierung und Inklusion. Baden-Baden
Bucchi M (1998) Science and the Media. Alternative routes in scientific communication. London
Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Entscheidung vom 19. Dezember 1985, Amtliche Entscheidungssammlung 72: 300-332
Buonanno L, Zablotney S, Keefer R (2001) Politics versus Science in the Making of a New Regulatory Regime for Food in Europe, European Integration online Papers, vol 5, no 12
Commission of the EC, European Governance, A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 endg.,Brussels 2001
Daum A (2002) Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert. München
Elam M, Bertilson M (2003) Consuming, Engaging and Confronting Science. The Emerging Dimensions of Scientific Citizenship, European Journal of Social Theory 6(2): 233–251
Epp A (1998) Divergierende Konzepte von „Verfahrensgerechtigkeit“. Eine Kritik der Procedural Justice Forschung. In: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Discussion Papers FS II, pp 98–302. Berlin
Grant CB (2004) Uncertain Communications: Uncertain Social Systems. Soziale Systeme 10: 217–232
Gregory J, Miller St (1998) Science in Public. Communication, Culture, and Credibility Cambridge
Harremoes P, Gee D, MacGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B, Guedes Vaz B (eds) (2002) Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century. Late Lessons from early Warnings. London
House of Lords (2002) Select Committee on Science and Technology, 3rd Report. Science and Society, London
Japp KP (2000) Risiko. Bielefeld
Kent J (2003) Lay Experts and the politics of breast implants. Public Understanding of Science 12: 403–421
Ladeur KH (2003) The Introduction of the Precautionary Principle into EU Law: A Pyrrhic Victory for Environmental and Public Health Law? Decision-Making under Conditions of Complexity in Multi-Level Political Systems. Common Market Law Review 40: 1455–1479
Liberatore A, Funtowicz S (2000) ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: what does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy 30(3): 146–150
Luhmann N (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt
Luhmann N (1991) Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin
Marris C, Wynne B, Simmons P, Welden S (2001) Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe. Final Report of the PABE Research Project, Brussels
Miller St (2000) Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads, paper prepared for conference on: Science Communication, Education and the History of Science. Royal Society, London
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-Thinking Science. Cambridge
Nowotny H (2005) The Changing Nature of Public Science. In this volume: 1
Pestre D (2005) The technosciences between markets, social worries and the political: how to imagine a better future? In this volume: 29
Report of the Working Group (2001) “Democratizing Expertise and Establishing Scientific Reference Systems”. Brussels
Roqueplo P (1995) Scientific expertise among political powers, administrations and public opinion. Science and Public Policy 22: 175–182
Scherzberg A (2004) Risikosteuerung durch Verwaltungsrecht: Ermöglichung oder Begrenzung von Innovationen. Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 63: 214–258
Schulze-Fielitz H (2005) Responses of the Legal Order to the Loss of Trust in Science. In this volume: 63
Shaw A (2002) “It just goes against the grain.” Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK. Public Understanding of Science 11: 273–291
Stehr N (2003) Wissenspolitik. Frankfurt
Stichweh R (2003) The multiple public of Science: Inclusion and Popularization. Soziale Systeme 9: 210–220
Trute HH (2003) From Past to Future Risk — From Private to Public Law. In: European Review of Public Law 15: 73–103
Trute HH (2004) Methodik der Herstellung und Darstellung verwaltungsrechtlicher Entscheidungen, in: Schmidt-Aßmann E, Hoffmann-Riem W (eds) Methoden der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft. Baden-Baden, pp 293–327
Trute HH (2005) Comment: from a Legal Perspective, In this volume: 53
Weingart P (1999) Scientific Expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy 26: 151–161
Weingart P (2001) Die Stunde der Wahrheit. Weilerswist
van Zwanenberg P, Millstone E (2000) Beyond Sceptical Relativism: Evaluating the Social Constructions of Expert Risk Assessments, in: Science, Technology & Human Values 25: 259–282
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trute, HH. (2005). Democratizing Science: Expertise and Participation in Administrative Decision-Making. In: The Public Nature of Science under Assault. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28886-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28886-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25791-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28886-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)