Advertisement

The Technosciences between Markets, Social Worries and the Political: How to Imagine a Better Future?

Chapter

Keywords

Civil Society Venture Capital Pension Fund Social Worry Living Entity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Angell M, Relman AS (2002) Patents, profits and American medicine: conflicts of interests in the testing and marketing of new drugs. Daedalus: 102–111Google Scholar
  2. Beck U (2002) Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett JA (1987) The Divided Circle. A History of Instruments for Astronomy, Navigation and Surveying. Phaiden/Christie’s, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Boltanski L, Thévenot L (1991) De la justification, Les économies de la grandeur. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Boltanski L, Chiapello E (2000) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Boltanski L, Chiapello E (2000) The New Spirit of Capitalism; paper presented to the Conference of Europeanists, March 14–16, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyle J (2002) Fencing off ideas. Daedalus: 13–25Google Scholar
  8. Buderi R (2000) Engines of Tomorrow. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassier M, Gaudillière JP (2000) Recherche, médecine et marché: la génétique du cancer du sein. Sciences Sociales et Santé 18: 29–50Google Scholar
  10. Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain, essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Coriat B, Orsi F (2002) Establishing a New Intellectual Property Rights in the United States, Origins, Content, Problems, Research Policy, vol 31Google Scholar
  12. Dahan A, Pestre D (eds) (2004) Les sciences pour la guerre. EHESS, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Dasgupta P (2000) Science as an Institution: Setting Priorities in a New Socio-economic Context, World Conference on Science, Science for the 21st century, A New Commitment. UNESCO, Paris, pp 264–271Google Scholar
  14. Demeritt D (2001) The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91(2): 307–337Google Scholar
  15. Edgerton D (1997) Science in the United Kingdom: A case study in the Nationalization of Science. In: Krige, Pestre D (eds) Science in the Twentieth Century. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 759–776Google Scholar
  16. Falk R (1999) Predatory Globalization: A Critique. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitoussi JP (2002) Démocratie et mondialisation. Revue de l’OFCE, hors série: 7–18Google Scholar
  18. Hatchuel A (2000) Agir public et conception collective: l’expertise comme processus démocratique. In: Heurgon E, Landrieu J (eds) Prospective pour une gouvernance. Editions de l’Aube, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermitte MA (1998) Pour une agence de l’expertise scientifique. La Recherche 309: 95–97Google Scholar
  20. Hermitte MA, Dormont D (2000) Propositions pour le principe de précaution ð la lumière de l’affaire de la vache folle. In: Kourilsky P, Viney G (eds) Le principe de précaution. Odile Jacob, La Documentation Française, Paris, pp 341–386Google Scholar
  21. Joly PB (1999) Besoin d’expertise et quête d’une légitimité nouvelle: quelles procédures pour réguler l’expertise? Revue Française des Affaires Sociales 1: 45–52Google Scholar
  22. Kalaora B (1999) Global experts: la religion des mots, Ethnologie Française XXIX: 513–527Google Scholar
  23. Kleinman D (1998) Beyond the Science Wars: Contemplating the Democratization of Science, Politics and the Life Sciences 16(2): 133–145Google Scholar
  24. Lessig L (2004) Free Culture, How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. The Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Manent P (2001) Cours familier de philosophie politique. Fayard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Moreau Defarges P (2001) Gouvernance, Le Débat 115: 165–172Google Scholar
  27. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-Thinking Science, Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Pestre D (2003) Science, argent et politique, un essai d’interprétation. INRA, coll Sciences en Question, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Posner RA (2002) The law and economics of intellectual property. Daedalus: 5–12Google Scholar
  30. Reich MR (ed) (2002) Public-Private Partnerships for Public Health. Harvard Series on Population and International HealthGoogle Scholar
  31. Ricoeur P (1991) Postface au Temps de la Responsabilité, Lectures 1, Autour du politique. Seuil, Essais, ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Romi R (to be published) Codex Alimentarius: de l’ambivalence ð l’ambiguïtéGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy 7: 385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spary E (2000) Utopia’s Garden, French Natural History from Old Regime to Revolution. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Veltz P (2000) Le nouveau monde industriel. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  36. Waring S (1991) Taylorism transformed, Scientific Management Theory since 1945. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin · Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations