Skip to main content

Financial Fragility and Scaling Distributions in the Laboratory

  • Conference paper
The Complex Networks of Economic Interactions

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 567))

  • 849 Accesses

Summary

We present results from human and computer-based experiments aimed at exploring the role of rationality and financial markets in explaining the emergence of some well-known stylized facts regarding industrial and aggregate dynamics. We find that the information conveyed by financial markets helps agents adopt more rational decision processes. Rationality, in turn, is necessary to observe smooth aggregate behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amaral L, Buldyrev S, Havlin S, Salinger M, Stanley E (1998) Power Law Scaling for a System of Interacting Units with Complex Internal Structure, Physical Review Letters, 80:1385–1388

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Axtell R (2001) Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes, Science, 293:1818–1820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bak P (1997) How Nature Works, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blank A, Solomon S (2000) Power Laws in Cities Population, Financial Markets and Internet Sites, Physica A, 287:279–288

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bottazzi, Devetag G (2003) Coordination and Self-Organization in Minority Games: Experimental Evidence, in Kirman A, Gallegati M, Marsili M (Eds.), The Complex Dynamics of Economic Interaction: Essays in Economics and Econophysics, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 283–300

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brock W (1999) Scaling in Economics: A Reader’s Guide, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8:409–446

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Caves R (1998) Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, 36:1947–1982

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delli Gatti D., Di Guilmi C., Gallegati M., Giulioni G. (2004a), Financial Fragility, Industrial Dynamics and Business Fluctuations in an Agent-Based Model, Macroeconomic Dynamics, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delli Gatti D., Di Guilmi C., Gaffeo E., Gallegati M., Giulioni G., Palestrini A. (2004b) A New Approach to Business Fluctuations: Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, Scaling Laws and Financial Fragility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delli Gatti D., Gaffeo E., Gallegati M., Giulioni G., Kirman A., Palestrini A., Russo A. (2004c) Complex Dynamics and Empirical Evidence, Information Sciences, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Durlauf S (2003) Complexity and Empirical Economics, mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaffeo E, Gallegati M, Palestrini A (2003) On the Size Distribution of Firms: Additional Evidence from the G7 Countries, Physica A 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gallegati M, Giulioni G, Kochji N (2003) Complex Dynamics and Financial Fragility in an Agent-Based Model, Advances in Complex Systems 6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenwald and Stiglitz (1993) Financial Market Imperfections and Business Cycles Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:77–113

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee Y, Amaral L, Canning D, Meyer M, Stanley E (1998) Universal Features in the Growth Dynamics of Complex Organizations, Physical Review Letters, 81:3275–3278

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagel R, Tang FF (1998) Experimental Results on the Centipede Game in Normal Form: an investigation on learning, Journal of mathematical Psychology 42:356–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nørrelykke S, Bak P (2002), Self-Organized Criticality in a Transient System, Physics Review 68

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stanley M, Amaral L, Buldyrev S, Havlin S, Leschorn H, Maas P, Salinger M, Stanley E (1996), Scaling Behavior in the Growth of Nature, 379:804–806

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zwick R, Rapoport A (2002) Tacit Coordination in a Decentralized Market Entry Game with Fixed Capacity, Experimental Economics 5(3):253–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Devetag, G., Gaffeo, E., Gallegati, M., Giulioni, G. (2006). Financial Fragility and Scaling Distributions in the Laboratory. In: Namatame, A., Kaizouji, T., Aruka, Y. (eds) The Complex Networks of Economic Interactions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 567. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28727-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics