Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bonding to Dentin: Smear Layer and the Process of Hybridization

  • Chapter
Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding

Abstract

The use of composite filling materials along with adhesive techniques has revolutionized present dental practice. The esthetic potential, handling, and wear properties of composite fillings have improved drastically [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Summit J, Robbins J, Schwartz R. Operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. Quintessence, Chicago, 2001, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R, Gaebler P. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations: a 10-year report. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31:991–1000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Opdam N, Loomans B, Roeters F, Bronkhorst E. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 2004; 32:379–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; 6:119–144

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83:454–458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hobson R, McCabe J, Hogg S. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 2001; 17:184–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer P, Pashley D. Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin. Am J Dent 1995; 8:297–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer P, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 1996; 24:435–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 1998; 26:609–616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phrukkanon S, Burrow M, Tyas M. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 1999; 27:265–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The bond of resin to different dentin surface characteristics. Oper Dent 2004; 29:333–341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tay F, Pashley D. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 2004; 32:173–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kusunoki M, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S. The efficacy of dentine adhesive to sclerotic dentine. J Dent 2002; 30:91–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwong S, Cheung G, Kei L, Itthagarun A, Smales R, Tay F et al. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002;18:359–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwong S, Tay F, Yip H, Kei L, Pashley D. An ultrastructural study of the application of dentine adhesives to acid-conditioned sclerotic dentine. J Dent 2000; 28:515–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003; 28:647–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yazici A, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27:360–366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lussi A, Gygax M. Iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth during classical approximal box preparation. J Dent 1998; 26:435–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeGrange M, Roulet F. Minimally invasive restorations with bonding. Quintessence, Chicago, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tyas M, Anusavice K, Frencken J, Mount G. Minimal intervention dentistry — a review. FDI Commission Project 1–97. Int Dent J 2000; 50:1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Murdoch-Kinch C, McLean M. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:87–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burnett LJ, Conceicao E, Pelinos J, Eduardo C. Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001; 19:199–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gwinnett A. Smear layer: morphological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl 1984; 3:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Blomlof J, Blomlof L, Lindskog S. Smear layer formed by different root planing modalities and its removal by an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid gel preparation. Int J Periodon Restor Dent 1997; 17:242–249

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pashley D, Tao L, Boyd L, King G, Horner J. Scanning electron microscopy of the substructure of smear layers in human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1988; 33:265–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Prati C. Mechanisms of dentin bonding. Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium, 1993, pp 171–191

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tani C, Finger W. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:283–289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruse N, Smith D. Adhesion to bovine dentin-surface characterization. J Dent Res 1991; 70:1002–1008

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. White G, Beech D, Tyas M. Dentin smear layer: an asset or a liability for bonding? Dent Mater 1989; 5:379–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Clark-Holke D, Drake D, Walton R, Rivera E, Guthmiller J. Bacterial penetration through canals of endodontically treated teeth in the presence or absence of the smear layer. J Dent 2003; 31:275–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pashley D. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl 1984; 3:13–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pashley D. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Proc Finn Dent Soc Suppl 1992; 88:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pashley D. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66:777–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tao L, Pashley D. Shear bond strengths to dentin: effects of surface treatments, depth and position. Dent Mater 1988; 4:371–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pashley D, Carvalho R. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997; 25:355–372

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28:215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pashley D. Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pashley D, Michelich V, Kehl T. Dentin permeability: effects of smear layer removal. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46:531–537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pashley D. Dentin: a dynamic substrate — a review. Scanning Microsc 1989; 3:161–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley D, Hosoda H, Sano H. Effects of high-speed cutting on dentin permeability and bonding. Dent Mater 1991; 7:234–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Prati C, Pashley D, Montanari G. Hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater 1991; 7:54–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jacobsen T, Soderholm K. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995; 11:132–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y et al. Effect of Cavity Configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 21:110–124

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hirata K, Nakashima M, Sekine I, Mukouyama Y, Kimura K. Dentinal fluid movement associated with loading of restorations. J Dent Res 1991; 70:975–978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tay F, Pashley D. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17:296–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent 2001; 29:7–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, About I. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater 2000; 16:432–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 2002;28:17–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. White G, Beech D, Tyas M. Dentin smear layer: an asset or a liability for bonding? Dent Mater 1989; 5:379–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G et al. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Dent Mater 2001; 17:445–455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bogra P, Kaswan S. Etching with EDTA-an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2003; 21:79–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Viswanath D, Hegde A, Munshi A. The removal of the smear layer using EGTA: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003; 28:69–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17:122–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Opdam N, Roeters J, van Berghem E, Eijsvogels E, Bronkhorst E. Microleakage and damage to adjacent teeth when finishing class II adhesive preparations using either a sonic device or bur. Am J Dent 2002; 15:317–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wicht M, Haak R, Fritz U, Noack M. Primary preparation of class II cavities with oscillating systems. Am J Dent 2002; 15:21–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pioch T, Garcia-Godoy F, Duschner H, Koch M, Staehle H, Dorfer C. Effect of cavity preparation instruments (oscillating or rotating) on the composite-dentin interface in primary teeth. Dent Mater 2003; 19:259–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Setien V, Cobb D, Denehy G, Vargas M. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001; 14:157–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Malmstrom H, Chaves Y, Moss M. Patient preference: conventional rotary handpieces or air abrasion for cavity preparation. Oper Dent 2003; 28:667–671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mattar Lima D. Air abrasion: exploring its potential. Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  60. Geitel B, Kostka E, Wischnewski R, Roulet J. Tensile bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:25–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Borsatto M, Catirse A, Palma Dibb R, Nascimento T, Rocha R, Corona S. Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system. Braz Dent J 2002; 13:175–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mehl A, Kremers L, Salzmann K, Hickel R. 3D volume-ablation rate and thermal side effects with the Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser. Dent Mater 1997; 13:246–251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kawaguchi F, Eduardo C, Matos A. Nd:YAG laser influence on microleakage of class V composite restoration. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2003; 21:227–229

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Attrill D, Davies R, King T, Dickinson M, Blinkhorn A. Thermal effects of the Er:YAG laser on a simulated dental pulp: a quantitative evaluation of the effects of a water spray. J Dent 2004; 32:35–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kataumi M, Nakajima M, Yamada T, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of Er:YAG laser irradiated dentin using dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J 1998; 17:125–138

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall G. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001; 17:340–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ceballos L, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay F, Marshall G. Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin. J Dent Res 2002; 81:119–122

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ceballos L, Camejo D, Victoria F, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho R et al. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentine. J Dent 2003;31:469–477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Armengol V, Laboux O, Weiss P, Jean A, Hamel H. Effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAP laser irradiation on the surface roughness and free surface energy of enamel and dentin: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 2003; 28:67–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Neev J, Stabholtz A, Liaw L, Torabinejad M, Fujishige J, Ho P et al. Scanning electron microscopy and thermal characteristics of dentin ablated by a short-pulse XeCl excimer laser. Lasers Surg Med 1993; 13:353–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Visuri S, Gilbert J, Wright D, Wigdor H, Walsh JJ. Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J Dent Res 1996; 75:599–605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kohara E, Hossain M, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K, Inoue M, Sasa R. Morphological and microleakage studies of the cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation in primary teeth. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2002; 20:141–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hossain M, Yamada Y, Nakamura Y, Murakami Y, Tamaki Y, Matsumoto K. A study on surface roughness and microleakage test in cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities. Lasers Med Sci 2003; 18:25–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva D, Rivera F, Santana-Penin U. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surface. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:280–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yudhira R, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG-lased vs bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110:322–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Giachetti L, Russo D, Scarpelli F, Vitale M. SEM analysis of dentin treated with the Er:YAG laser: a pilot study of the consequences resulting from laser use on adhesion mechanisms. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2004; 22:35–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kameyama A, Kawada E, Amagai T, Takizawa M, Oda Y, Hirai Y. Effect of HEMA on bonding of Er:YAG laser-irradiated bovine dentine and 4-META/MMA-TBB resin. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:749–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Gonzalez B, Ruiz P, Rodriguez N, Martin B, Varela P, Magan M et al. A comparative study of microleakage through enamel and cementum after laser Er:YAG instrumentation in class V cavity obturations, using scanning electron microscopy. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2002; 20:197–201

    Google Scholar 

  79. Souza A de, Corona S, Palma Dibb R, Borsatto M, Pecora J. Influence of Er:YAG laser on tensile bond strength of a self-etching system and a flowable resin in different dentin depths. J Dent 2004; 32:269–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26:1–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16:265–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Tay F, Pashley D. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:726–731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71:1530–1540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Van Meerbeek B, Conn L Jr, Duke E, Eick J, Robinson S, Guerrero D. Correlative transmission electron microscopy examination of nondemineralized and demineralized resin-dentin interfaces formed by two dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1996; 75:879–888

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T et al. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996; 9:167–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Ferrari M, Goracci G, Garcia-Godoy F. Bonding mechanism of three “one-bottle” systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 10:224–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Maciel K, Carvalho R, Ringle R, Preston C, Russell C, Pashley D. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1851–1888

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. El Feninat F, Ellis T, Sacher E, Stangel I. A tapping mode AFM study of collapse and denaturation in dentinal collagen. Dent Mater 2001; 17:284–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992; 8:125–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Carvalho R, Mendonca J, Santiago S, Silveira R, Garcia F, Tay F et al. Effects of HEMA/solvent combinations on bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82:597–601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Van Meerbeek B, Dhem A, Goret-Nicaise M, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative SEM and TEM examination of the ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. J Dent Res 1993; 72:495–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Inoue S, Vargas M, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3:237–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2004; 29:376–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. van Dijken J. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000; 16:285–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Inoue S, Vargas M, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 2003; 16:329–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Finger W, Balkenhol M. Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:311–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Gwinnett A. Chemically conditioned dentin: a comparison of conventional and environmental scanning electron microscopy findings. Dent Mater 1994; 10:150–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent 1994; 19:59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Jacobsen T, Soderholm K, Garcea I, Mondragon E. Calcium leaching from dentin and shear bond strength after etching with phosphoric acid of different concentrations. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108:247–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Finger W, Balkenhol M. Rewetting strategies for bonding to dry dentin with an acetone-based adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2:51–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000; 25:324–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Gwinnett A. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992; 5:127–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Kanca J III. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992; 5:213–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Tay F, Gwinnett A, Pang K, Wei S. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1034–1044

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Tay F, Gwinnett J, Wei S. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996; 12:236–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Tay F, Gwinnett J, Wei S. The overwet phenomenon in two-component acetone-based primers containing aryl amine and carboxylic acid monomers. Dent Mater 1997; 13:118–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Tay F, Gwinnett A, Wei S. The overwet phenomenon: an optical, micromorphological study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996; 9:43–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Toledano M, Osorio R, Leonardi G de, Rosales-Leal J, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez M. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001; 14:205–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Endo K, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater 2000; 16:406–411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resindentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000; 79:1385–1391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Pioch T, Staehle H, Duschner H, Garcia-Godoy F. Nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface: a review. Am J Dent 2001; 14:252–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Nystrom G, Holtan J, Phelps R, Becker W, Anderson T. Temperature and humidity effects on bond strength of a dentinal adhesive. Oper Dent 1998; 23:138–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Tay F, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley D. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2:99–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Tay F, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley E, Pashley D. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000b; 2:83–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanisms of self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent 1999; 10:131–175

    Google Scholar 

  116. Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa B, Lopes M. “No-bottle” vs “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives: a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17:373–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Chan K, Tay F, King N, Imazato S, Pashley D. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent 2003; 16:340–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley D. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1212–1220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M et al. One day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  120. De Munck J. An in vitro and in vivo study on the durability of biomaterial-tooth bonds: Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  121. Oliveira S, Marshall S, Hilton J, Marshall G. Etching kinetics of a self-etching primer. Biomaterials 2002; 23:4105–4112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000; 79:709–714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Tay F, King N, Chan K, Pashley D. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:255–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Turkun S. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 2003; 31:527–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Lambrechts P. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Oper Dent (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  126. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005

    Google Scholar 

  127. Cho B, Dickens S. Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 2004; 20:107–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000; 13:44–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Walker M, Wang Y, Swafford J, Evans A, Spencer P. Influence of additional acid etch treatment on resin cement dentin infiltration. J Prosthodont 2000; 9:77–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Agee K, Pashley E, Itthagarun A, Sano H, Tay F, Pashley D. Submicron hiati in acid-etched dentin are artifacts of desiccation. Dent Mater 2003; 19:60–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Carvalho R, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley D, Prati C, Tay F. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005; 26:1035–1042

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Itthagarun A, Tay F. Self-contamination of deep dentin by dentin fluid. Am J Dent 2000; 13:195–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges J. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 132:1621–1629

    Google Scholar 

  134. Fritz U, Finger W. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1999; 12:277–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha J, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001; 29:55–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Tay F, Pashley D. Permeability of single-step, self-etch adhesives: the cost of saving time. Tokyo, 2001, pp 23–39

    Google Scholar 

  137. Tay F, Pashley D, Suh B, Carvalho R, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002; 30:371–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Tay F, Pashley D, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2002; 81:472–476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82:136–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Hashimoto M, Tay F, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Yiu C et al. SEM and TEM analysis of water degradation of human dentinal collagen. J Biomed Mater Res 2003; 66B:287–298

    Google Scholar 

  141. Tay F, Pashley D. Water treeing: a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2003; 16:6–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Snauwaert J et al. Phase-separation in contemporary one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005; 84:183–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Yoshioka M, Snauwaert J, Abe Y et al. Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res 2001; 80:1565–1569

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Yoshioka M, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Nomura Y et al. Adhesion/decalcification mechanisms of acid interactions with human hard tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 59:56–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S et al. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomers bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2001; 80

    Google Scholar 

  146. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann K, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions: 5-year results. Am J Dent 2001; 14:153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Tyas M, Burrow M. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years. Oper Dent 2002; 27:438–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Kanumilli P. Clinical and laboratory effectiveness of contemporary adhesives. Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium, 2004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. K. Van Landuyt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. De Munck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Coutinho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Peumans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Lambrechts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B. Van Meerbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, 2 Thivon Street, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece

    George Eliades DDS, Dr. Dent.

  2. Biomaterials Research Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK

    David Watts PhD, DSc, FADM

  3. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Theodore Eliades DDS, MS, Dr.Med., PhD, FADM

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Landuyt, K., De Munck, J., Coutinho, E., Peumans, M., Lambrechts, P., Van Meerbeek, B. (2005). Bonding to Dentin: Smear Layer and the Process of Hybridization. In: Eliades, G., Watts, D., Eliades, T. (eds) Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23408-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28559-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation