Skip to main content

How Do the Differences Among Order Distributions Affect the Rate of Investment Returns and the Contract Rate

  • Conference paper
Artificial Economics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 564))

  • 857 Accesses

Summary

Although the distribution of orders follows exponential distribution is reported in a market study, researchers rarely questioned about how differences among order distributions affect the rate of investment returns (RI) and contract rate (CR). In this study, we compared several order distributions (OD) using U-Mart (Unreal Market as an Artificial Research Testbed), an artificial market simulation system. We also controlled the type of time series of spot price data (PI) and the average of the distribution (m) in our experiment. We found that CR attains the maximum when m= 10, ODs were Constant and PIs were Down. The average RI attains maximum in most of the cases when m= 50, PIs were Up and ODs are Uniform and Constant.

These results may suggest further study about that (1) which quantity management strategy is profitable for a trading agent and that (2) which kind of order distribution can improve market efficiency is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Izumi K. (2003). Artificial Market, Morikita publishing (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deguchi H, Izumi K, Shiozawa K, Takayasu Y, Terano H, Sato T, Kita H (1997). “Discussion Socially and scholarly meanings for studying artificial market” The Book of Artificial Interigence Society, 12(1), p.1–8 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fukushima Y (2001). “The way of order matchings and price change in the JGB futures market.” The Agency of Money Market, Working Paper Series, 2001-J-1 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greene WH (2002). Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kawagoe T, Wada S (2005). “A New Approach to Controlling Artificial Market Conditions”, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy JJ (1986). Technical Analysis of the Future Markets, New York Insutitute of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy JJ (1997). Study Guide for Technical Analysis of the Future Markets, New York Insutitute of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakajima Y, Ono I, Sato H, Mori N, Kita H, Matsui H, Taniguchi K, Deguchi H, Terano T, Shiozawa Y (2004). “Introducing Virtual Futures Market System “U-Mart”,” Experiments in Economic Sciences-New Approaches to Solving Real-world Problems.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tanaka K (1998). A Big Book of Technical Analysis, Sigma Base Capital (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. UMIE2004 System Operational Committee (2004). “Overview of UMIE2004 — December 1th, 2003 Version” (Appendix of U-Mart developer kit).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yamamoto, S., Wada, S., Kawagoe, T. (2006). How Do the Differences Among Order Distributions Affect the Rate of Investment Returns and the Contract Rate. In: Beckmann, M., et al. Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 564. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28547-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics