Summary
The Lattice QCD (LQCD) community has occasionally gone through periods of self-examination of its data analysis methods and compared them with methods used in other disciplines [22, 16, 18]. This process has shown that the techniques widely used elsewhere may also be useful in analyzing LQCD data. It seems that we are in such a period now with many groups trying what are generally called Bayesian methods such as Maximal Entropy (MEM) or constrained fitting [19, 15, 1, 7, 5, and many others]. In these proceedings we will attempt to apply this process to a comparison of data modeling techniques used in LQCD and NMR Spectroscopy to see if there are methods which may also be useful when applied to LQCD data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chris Allton, Danielle Blythe, and Jonathan Clowser. Spectral functions, maximum entropy method and unconventional methods in lattice field theory. Nucl.Phys. Proc. Suppl., 109A:192–196, 2002.
Niels H. Abel. Beweis der Unmöglichkeit, algebraische Gleichungen von höheren Graden als dem vierten allgemein aufzulösen. J. reine angew. Math., 1:65,1826. See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AbelsImpossibilityTheorem.html for more references.
F. L. Bauer. Optimally scaled matrices. Numer. Math., 5:73–87, 1963.
John Bolstad. varpro.f. Available at: http://www.netlib.org/opt/index.html, January1977.
T. Draper et al. An algorithm for obtaining reliable priors for constrained-curve fits. 2003.
Carl H. Eckart and Gale Young. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1:211–218, 1936.
H. Rudolf Fiebig. Spectral density analysis of time correlation functions in lattice QCD using the maximum entropy method. Phys. Rev., D65:094512, 2002.
Carl F. Gauss. Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae. Comment. Soc. Reg. Sci. Gotten. Recent., 5:33, 1823.
Gene H. Golub. Some modified matrix eigenvalue problems. SIAM Rev., 15:318–334, 1973.
Gene H. Golub and Victor Pereyra. The differentiation of pseudoinverses and nonlinear least squares problems whose variables separate. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 10:413–432, 1973.
Gene H. Golub and Christian H. Reinsch. Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numer. Math., 14:403–420, 1970.
Gene H. Golub and Charles F. Van Loan. An analysis of the total least squares problem. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 17:883–893, 1980.
S. Y. Kung, K. S. Arun, and D. V. Bhaskar Rao. State-space and singular value decomposition-based approximation methods for the harmonic retrieval problem. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 73:1799–1811, 1983.
Ramdas Kumeresan and Donald W. Tufts. Estimating the parameters of exponentially damped sinusoids and pole-zero modeling in noise. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc., 30:833–840, 1982.
G. P. Lepage et al. Constrained curve fitting. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 106:12–20, 2002.
Chris Michael. Fitting correlated data. Phys. Rev., D49:2616–2619, 1994.
Leon Mirsky. Symmetric gauge functions and unitarily invariant norms. Quart.J. Math. Oxford Ser., 11:50–59, 1960.
Chris Michael and A. McKerrell. Fitting correlated hadron mass spectrum data. Phys. Rev., D51: 3745–3750, 1995.
Y. Nakahara, M. Asakawa, and T. Hatsuda. Hadronic spectral functions in lattice QCD. Phys. Rev., D60:091503, 1999.
William H. Press, Brian P. Flannery, Saul A. Teukolsky, and William T. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) and New York, second edition, 1992.
C. F. Tirendi and J. F. Martin. Quantitative analysis of NMR spectra by linear prediction and total least squares. J. Magn. Reson., 85:162–169, 1989.
D. Toussaint. In T. DeGrand and D. Toussaint, editors, From Actions to Answers, page 121, Singapore, 1990. World Scientific. Proceedings of Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, USA, June 5–30, 1989.
Sabine Van Huffel. Available at: http://www.netlib.org/vanhuffel/, 1988.
Sabine Van Huffel. The generalized total least squares problem: formulation,algorithm and properties. In Gene H. Golub and P. Van Dooren, editors, Numerical Linear Algebra, Digital Signal Processing and Parallel Algorithms, volume 70 of NATO ASI Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, pages 651–660, Berlin, 1990. Springer-Verlag. Proceedings of NATO ASI, Leuven, Belgium, August 1988.
Sabine Van Huffel. Reliable and efficient techniques based on total least squares for computing consistent estimators in models with errors in the variables. In J. G. McWhirter, editor, Mathematics in Signal Processing II, pages 593–603, Oxford, 1990. Clarendon Press. Proceedings of IMA conference, December 1988.
Leentje Vanhamme. Advanced time-domain methods for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy data analysis. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, November 1999. ftp://ftp.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/sista/vanhamme/reports/phd.ps.gz.
Sabine Van Huffel, H. Chen, C. Decanniere, and P. Van Hecke. Algorithm for time-domain NMR data fitting based on total least squares. J. Magn. Reson., Ser. A, 110:228–237, 1994.
Sabine Van Huffel and Joos Vandewalle. The Total Least Squares Problem: Computational Aspects and Analysis, volume 9 of Frontiers in Applied Mathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992.
Sabine Van Huffel and H. Zha. The restricted total least squares problem:formulation, algorithm and properties. SIAM J. Matrix Anal.Appl., 12:292–309, 1991.
Eric W. Weisstein. Moore-Penrose matrix inverse. http://mathworld.wolfram. com/Moore-PenroseMatrixInverse.html, 2004. From MathWorld — A Wolfram Web Resource.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fleming, G.T. (2005). What Can Lattice QCD Theorists Learn from NMR Spectroscopists?. In: Bori~i, A., Frommer, A., Joó, B., Kennedy, A., Pendleton, B. (eds) QCD and Numerical Analysis III. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 47. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28504-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28504-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21257-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28504-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)