Abstract
Internal grants are unique and the specific requirements vary from institution to institution. However, the audience for internal grant proposals is often very similar. In most cases, grant proposals are reviewed by colleagues and administrators from various disciplines and these reviewers are seldom “experts” in the field. Insofar as the audience is comprised more or less of generalists, it is essential that grant proposals be prepared with this in mind. The success or failure of this proposal was heavily dependent upon the its ability to convey the unique nature of the spatial approach and how the geographical approach may yield decidedly different results relative to the earlier work of Knack. The following model proposal was submitted to the Indiana State University Research Committee (URC) and the grant was awarded. However, the budget was altered based on the availability of funds and URC’s assessment of current programmatic resources. For this reason, the original budget (not included in this model) was reduced from $1400 to $1150.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AllPolitics. 2000. Glimpses of voter turnout across America. CNN: AllPolitics.com, November 7. [http://www.cnn.com].
Abelson, R. 1987 (n/d). Results of Experiment on Improving the Accuracy of Self-reported Turnout. Based on the 1987 NES Pilot Study. The University of Michigan, National Election Studies Center, Ann Arbor.
Bierly, G.D. and J.A. Harrington, Jr. 1995. A climatology of transition season Colorado cyclones. Journal of Climate, 8:853–863.
Business Wire. 2000. Press Release (from The Weather Channel): Election Day Weather: Who Wins When It Rains? The Weather Channel Offers the Election Day National Forecast. November 3.
Cohn, E. 1993. Weather and Crime. The British Journal of Criminology 30:51–64.
DeNardo, J. 1980. Turnout and the vote: The joke’s on the Democrats. American Political Science Review 74:406–420.
DeNardo, J. 1996. Does heavy turnout help Democrats in presidential elections? American Political Science Review 80:1298–1304.
Fain, J. and Dworkin, J. 1993. Determinants of voter participation: Some simulation results. Public Choice 77:823.
Gagge, A. P., A.C. Burton and H.C. Bazett 1941. A practical system of units for the description of heat exchange of man with his environment. Science, 94:428–430.
Gruenwald, J. 1994. Rain dampens turnout but GOP see vote share rise. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, July 23, p. 2065.
Harman, J.R. 1991. A synoptic climatology of the westerlies: Process and patterns, Association of American Geographers Resource Publication, Washington D.C.
Katz, R. 1993. Dynamic Cost-Loss Ratio Decision-Making Model with an Autocorrelated Climate Variable. Journal of Climate 6:151–160.
Knack, S. 1994. Does rain help the Republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote. Public Choice 79:187–209.
Knack, S. 1992. Social Connectedness and Voter Participation: Evidence from the 1991 NES Pilot Study. The University of Michigan, National Election Studies Center, Ann Arbor.
Morton, R. 1991. Groups in rational turnout models. American Journal of Political Science 35: 758–776.
Nagel, J. and McNulty, J. 2000. Partisan effects of voter turnout in presidential elections. American Politics Quarterly 28:408–429.
National Election Studies (NES). 2000. The University of Michigan’s National Election Studies Center. [http://www.umich.edu/~nes/].
Radcliff, B. 1994. Turnout and the Democratic vote. American Politics Quarterly 22:259–276.
Rotton, J. and Cohn, E. 2000. Weather, disorderly conduct, and assaults: From social contact to social avoidance. Environment and Behavior 35:651–684.
Shields, T. and Goidel, R. 2000. Who contributes? Checkbook participation, class biases, and the impact of legal reforms, 1952–1992. American Politics Quarterly 28:216–234.
Sluis, T. 2000. Weather blamed for voter turnout. Durango Herald, October 24.
Weisberg, H. and Grofman, B. 1981. Candidate evaluations and turnout. American Politics Quarterly 9:197–219.
Yan, Y. and Oliver, J. 1996. The CLO: A utilitarian unit to measure weather/climate comfort. International Journal of Climatology 16:1045–1056.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). Intramural Grants. In: Research Design and Proposal Writing in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27953-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27953-9_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27952-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27953-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)