Skip to main content

Dissertation III: Physical Systems

  • Chapter
  • 1147 Accesses

Abstract

This proposal has two unique features. First, the literature section distills complex research in geomorphology into easily understood concepts. Further, the author explicitly cites the works from which the hypotheses are derived. Second, the methods section of this proposal provides a solid example how research methodologies are inherently linked to the literature review. Additionally, the proposal’s introduction and explanation of the methods and associated equations is both economical and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagnold, R.A. 1960. Some aspects of the shape of river meanders. USGS Professional Paper No. 282E. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardecki, M.J. 1984. What value wetlands? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39(3):166–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschta, R.I. and Platts, W.S. 1986. Morphological features of small streams: Significance and function. Water Resources Bulletin 22(3):369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik, N.G. 1989. Physical impacts of human alterations within river basins: The case study of the Kankakee, Mississippi, and Illinois rivers. In Hydraulics and the Environment, Proceedings of the 23rd Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, Technical Session B: Fluvial Hydraulics, August 21–25, Ottawa, Canada, pp. B139–B146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik, N.G. and Bonini, A.P. 1981. An historical review of the Kankakee River basin development. in Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 74(1-2):203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, et al. 1992. An inland wetlands commissioner’s guide to site plan review. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Management, Inland Water Resources Division/Inland Wetland Programs, Hartford, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, V. 1986. Overview of the hydrologic concerns related to wetlands in the United States. Canadian Journal of Botany 64(2):364–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.H. 1984. Analysis of river meanders. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 110:37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, J.C. 1995. Wetland mitigation, volume 3 of 6: Mycorrhizal associations in some Connecticut wetland plants. Connecticut Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC), Project No. 87-06, Report No. JHR 94-228, Connecticut State Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L.M., et al. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-79/31. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS, Inc. 1995. ERDAS Imagine Field Guide, 3rd Edition. Atlanta, Georgia: ERDAS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI, Inc. 1995. Arc/Info, version 7.0.4. Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI, Inc. 1996. ArcView, version 3.0a. Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlo, A.S. 1990. Wetland mitigation — case study. In Proceedings of the Second Annual New England Environmental Exposition. April 10–12, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 945–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildersleeve, R.P., Jr., Williams, D.J., and Cooper, D.J. 1989. Two urban stream construction and wetland restoration/creation projects in Aurora, Colorado. In Wetlands: Concerns and Successes Symposium. American Water Resources Association, September 17–22, Tampa, Florida, pp. 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurmu, M.C. and Andrle, R. 1997. Morphology of a wetland stream. Environmental Management 21(6): 921–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack, J.T. 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 294-B. Washington, D.C.: Us Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickin, E.J. 1974. The development of meanders in natural river-channels. American Journal of Science 274:414–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.A. and Melhorn, W.N. 1978. Rhythmic spacing and origin of pools and riffles. Geological Society of America Bulletin 89:723:730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusler, J.A., and Kentula, M.E. 1989. Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science, Vol. I and II. Corvallis, Oregon: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, W.B. and Leopold, L.B. 1966. River meanders — Theory of minimum variances. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 422-H Physiographic and Hydraulic Studies of Rivers. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte County. 1996. LaPorte County, Indiana 1996 Plat Book. LaPorte, Indiana: Authentic, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefor, M.W. et al. 1995. Wetland mitigation, volume 5 of 6: Technical summary. Connecticut Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC), Project No. 87-06, Report No. JHR 94-226. Connecticut State Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefor, M.W. and Gadwa, S.N. 1995. Wetland mitigation, Volume 1 of 6: Botany. Connecticut Joint Highway Research Advisory Council, Project No. 87-06, Report No. JHR 95-241. Connecticut State Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L.B. 1994. A View of the River. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L.B., et al. 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. San Francisco: W.F. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L.B. and Wolman, G.M. 1960. River meanders. Geological Society of America Bulletin 71: 769–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, D.J. 1990. Restoration and creation of palustrine wetlands associated with riverine systems of the glaciated northeast. In Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, J., Scheurmann, K., and Weiss, F.H. 1990. River Morphology: A Guide for Geoscientisits and Engineers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J. and Cronk, J.K. 1992. Creation and restoration of wetlands: Some design consideration for ecological engineering. In Advances in Soil Science, Vol. 17: Soil Restoration. R. Lal and B.A. Stewart Eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J. and Gooselink, J.G. 1993. Wetlands. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems, Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M.P. and Abrahams, A.D. 1984. Objective identification of pools and riffles. Water Resources Research 20(7):921–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • O≠ill, M.P. and Abrahams, A.D. 1986. Objective identification of meanders and bends. Journal of Hydrology 83(3/4):337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. 1976. On the cause and characteristic scale of meandering and braiding in rivers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 76:459–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, B.L. and Miller, M.V. 1990. Impacts of riverine wetlands construction and operation on stream channel stability: Conceptual framework for geomorphic assessment. Environmental Management 14(6):799–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P.H. and Murray, T.E. 1995. Wetland mitigation, volume 4 of 6: Wetland mitigation and water quality associated with the Central Connecticut Expressway. Connecticut Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC), Project No. 87-06, Report No. JHR 94-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K.S. 1976. The morphology of riffle-pool sequences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 1:71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K.S. 1978. Channel geometry in the riffle-pool sequence. Geografiska Annaler, Series A Physical Geography 60A(1-2):23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K.S. 1982. River: Form and Process in Alluvial Channels. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, S.J. 1972. A comparison of morphometric measures of bank full. Journal of Hydrology 17(1-2): 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm. S.A. 1960. The shape of alluvial channels in relation to sediment type. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 352-B. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S.A. 1963. Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the Great Plains. Geological Society of America Bulletin 74:1089–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Indiana. 1976. Kankakee River Basin, Indiana. Department of Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Indiana. 1990. Water Resource Availability in the Kankakee River Basin, Indiana. Department of Natural Resources Division of Water, Water Resource Assessment 90-3, Indianapolis, Indiana: State of Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, H.A. 1987. Hydrology and hydraulic requirements of successful wetlands. In Proceedings of the National Wetland Symposium: Wetland Hydrology. September 16–18, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.P. 1986. River meanders and channel size. Journal of Hydrology 88(1/2):147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, M.G. 1955. The natural channel of Brandywine Creek, Pennsylvania. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 271. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jurmu, M. (2005). Dissertation III: Physical Systems. In: Research Design and Proposal Writing in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27953-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics