Skip to main content

Geodynamic considerations of Uralian metallogeny

  • Conference paper
Mineral Deposit Research: Meeting the Global Challenge
  • 142 Accesses

Abstract

The analysis of relationships between metallogeny and geodynamics in the Urals made by preceding researchers in recent times has proven that they are related. However, in the present study more attention is paid to metallogeny of the platform (Middle Jurassic-Paleogene) and neotectonic (late Cenozoic) stages. It is also updated by new information concerning the Wilson cycles preceding the platform stage. It includes a revised understanding of geodynamic development of the Timanides (ocean formation in the Late Riphean and collision in the Late Vendian) and of the Uralides (a new interpretation of relationships between Tagil and Magnitogorsk arcs, arc-continent collision in the Late Devonian, subduction jump in the Early Carboniferous, and thrust stacking in the Late Carboniferous-Permian). More attention is paid to the problem of plumes and their role in metallogeny of the fold belt. It is shown that many well-defined types of ore deposits have become additional geodynamic indicators themselves. At the same time, it is taken into account that many deposits are polygenetic and different stages of their formation belong to different geodynamic stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Stern RJ (2002) Reviews of Geophysics 40(4): 3-1–3-39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bea F, Fershtater G, Montero P (2002) Granitoids of the Uralides: Implications for the Evolution of the Orogen. In: Brown D, Juhlin C, Puchkov V (eds) Mountain Building in the Uralides: Pangea to the Present. AGU Geophysical Monograph Series 132: 211–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Dushin VA (1997) Magmatism and geodynamics of paleocontinental sector of the North of the Urals. “Nedra” Moscow, 213 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington RJ, Armstrong RN, Zaykov VV, Maslennikov VV, Tessalina SG, Orgeval JJ, Taylor RNA (2002) Massive Sulfide deposits in the South Urals: Geological setting within the framework of the Uralide orogen. In: Brown D, Juhlin C, Puchkov V (eds) Mountain Building in the Uralides: Pangea to the Present. AGU Geophysical Monograph Series 132: 155–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov KS, Shmelev VR (1996) The Platinum-bearing belt of the Urals —magmatic trace of the Early Paleozoic subduction zone. Doklady of Academy of Sciences, geology 347: 649–652 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koroteev VA, Sazonov VN, Ogorodnikov VN (2001) Ore genesis and geodynamics of the Paleozoic history of the Urals. Lithosphera 1: 52–63 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Puchkov, V.N. (2005). Geodynamic considerations of Uralian metallogeny. In: Mao, J., Bierlein, F.P. (eds) Mineral Deposit Research: Meeting the Global Challenge. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27946-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics