Synthesis of Main Findings and Conclusions

Part of the Global Change — The IGBP Series book series (GLOBALCHANGE)


River Basin Coastal Zone Water Framework Directive Coastal System Submarine Groundwater Discharge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barth F, Fawell J (2001) The water framework directive and European water policy. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 50: 103–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesecker A (1996) The market as an instituted realm of social action. Bremer Diskussionpapiere zur Socialökonomie 1, University of Bremen, BremenGoogle Scholar
  3. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crossland CJ (2000) Improved strategies for linking coastal science and users. In: Pacyna JM, Kremer HH, Pirrone N, Barthel K-G (eds) Socio-economic aspects of fluxes of chemicals into the marine environment — workshop report, Keller, Norway 8–10 March 1999. EURO 19089. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp 199–210Google Scholar
  5. EEA (1998) Europe's environment: the second assessment. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  6. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1992) Risk management as a postnormal science. Risk Analysis 12(1):95–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Humphrey S, Burbridge P, Blatch C (2000) US lessons for coastal management in the European Union. Mar Pol 24:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaika M, Page B (2002) The making of the EU water framework directive: shifting choreographies of governance and the effectiveness of environmental lobbying. University of Oxford, School of Geography and the Environment. Economic Geography Research Group. WPG 02-12Google Scholar
  10. Kallis G, Butler D (2001) The EU water framework directive: measures and implications. Water Policy 3: 125–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kremer HH, Pirrone N (2000) Coastal zone management and integration of natural and socio-economic zones. Report of ELOISE Working Group 4. EU Commission, EUR 18599 — European Land-Ocean Interaction Studies, ELOISE, Implementation Report, Phase II, pp 56–68. European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  12. Ledoux L, Burgess D (2002) Science for water policy: the implications of the water framework directive. Proceedings of the SWAP Euroconference, 1–4 September 2002. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Meybeck M (1982) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus transport by world rivers. American Journal of Science 282:401–450Google Scholar
  14. Meybeck M, Ragu A (1997) River discharges to the oceans: an assessment of suspended solids, major ions and nutrients. GEMS/EAP ReportGoogle Scholar
  15. Milliman JD, Meade RH (1983) World-wide delivery of river sediment to the ocean. Journal of Geology 91:1–21Google Scholar
  16. Murray CN, Bidoglio G, Zaldivar J, Bouraoui F (2002) The water framework directive: the challenges of implementation for river basin-coastal zone research. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 11(9):530–541Google Scholar
  17. Ravetz J, Funtowicz S (1999) Post-normal science — an insight now maturing. Futures 31(7):641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salomons W, Bayne B, Heip CH, Turner RK (1995) Changing estuarine and coastal environment: sustainability and biodiversity in relation to economic aspects. Workshop report EERO-GKSS, Geesthacht, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith SV, Hollibaugh JT (1993) Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance. Reviews of Geophysics 31:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith SV, Renwick WH, Buddemeier RW, Crossland CJ (2001) Budgets of soil erosion and deposition for sediments and sedimentary organic carbon across the conterminous United States. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15(3):697–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Talaue-McManus L, Kremer HH, Marshall Crossland JI (2001) Biogeochemical and human dimensions of coastal functioning and change in Southeast Asia. Final report of the SARCS/WOTRO/LOICZ project 1996–1999. LOICZ Reports and Studies. LOICZ IPO, Texel, The Netherlands, No. 17Google Scholar
  22. Turner RK, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I (1998) Towards integrated modelling and analysis in coastal zones: principles and practice. LOICZ Reports and Studies. LOICZ IPO, Texel, The Netherlands, No. 11Google Scholar
  23. Wilson MA, Costanza R, Boumans R, Liu S (2003) Integrating assessment and valuation of ecosystem goods and services provided by coastal systems. In Wilson JG (ed) The intertidal ecosystem. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp 1–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations