Summary
The knee functions as a type of biological transmission whose purpose is to accept and transfer a range of loads between and among the femur, patella, tibia, and fibula without causing structural or metabolic damage. Arthritic knees are like living transmissions with worn bearings that have limited capacity to safely accept and transmit forces. A new method of representing the functional capacity of the knee and other joints is the “envelope of function”, a load and frequency distribution that delineates the range of loads a given joint can sustain while still maintaining homeostasis of all tissues. The purpose of joint replacement surgery, therefore, is to maximize the envelope of function for a given joint as safely and predictably as possible.
A fundamental principle of all orthopedic treatment is to restore, as much as possible, normal musculoskeletal function. Following minor trauma to a previously normal joint such as the knee (e.g., contusion, mild medial collateral ligament sprain), the process of healing — the result of over 400 million years of vertebrate evolutionarily designed molecular and cellular mechanisms [1] — is most often accomplished without the necessity of any therapeutic intervention. True restoration to the full preinjury functional status is expected and most often occurs. With more substantial trauma to the knee, such as occurs with a complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament treated with a reconstruction, restoration to the full pre-injury physiological functional status is more problematic and often does not occur despite modern surgical techniques [2–4].Even well-reconstructed knees have unfortunately demonstrated the development of early arthrosis if the joint is exposed to sufficiently high levels of loading, such as occurs with soccer and other similar pivoting sports. One can say that the pre-injury functional capacity of such an anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee has not been fully restored.
In the case of knees with advanced degenerative arthrosis which undergo joint replacement surgery, the principle of functional restoration may be more properly stated as maximization of the functional capacity of the knee. As effective as current joint replacement techniques are at achieving pain relief and often associated increases in muscle strength and control, knees that have had joint replacement surgery do not replicate the functional status of a healthy, uninjured, adult joint. No one with a total knee replacement, for example, should run marathons or play tackle football. Since the goal of total knee replacement surgery is to maximize joint function, what, then, is the function of the knee?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dye SF (1987) An evolutionary perspective of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 7:976–983
Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644
Dye SF, Wojtys EM, Fu FH, Fithian DC, Gillquist J (1998) Factors contributing to function of the knee joint after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 80A:1380–1393
Garrick JG, Requa RK (2003) Sports fitness activities: the negative consequences. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:439–443
Dye SF(1996) The knee as a biologic transmission with an envelope of function. Clin Orthop Rel Res 325:10–18
Dye SF, Vaupel GL, Dye CC (1998) Conscious neurosensory mapping of the internal structures of the human knee without intra-articular anesthesia. Am J Sports Med 26:773–777
Winter DA (1983) Energy generation and absorption at the ankle and knee during fast, natural, and slow cadences. Clin Orthop 175:147–154
Guyton AC, Hall JE (1996): Textbook of medical physiology. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia
Frost HM (1989) Some ABCs of skeletal pathophysiology. I: Introduction to the series [editorial]. Calcif Tissue Int 45:1–3
Frost HM (1989) Some ABCs of skeletal pathophysiology. II: General mediator mechanism properties [editorial]. Calcif Tissue Int 45:68–70
Frost HM (1989) Some ABCs of skeletal pathophysiology. IV: The transient/steady state distinction [editorial]. Calcif Tissue Int 45:134–136
Frost HM (1983: A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. Clin Orthop 175:286–292
Dye SF(1994) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and technetium scintigraphy in the detection of increased osseous metabolic activity about the knee of symptomatic adults. Orthop Trans 17:1060–1061
Brand RA, Stanford CM, Swan CC (2003) How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopedic surgeons. Iowa Orthop J 23:13–22
Henderson JJ, Bamford DJ, Noble J, Brown JD (1996) The value of skeletal scintigraphy in predicting the need for revision surgery in total knee replacement. Orthopedics 19:295–299
Smith SL, Wastie ML, Forster I (2001) Radionuclide bone scintigraphy in the detection of significant complications after total knee joint replacement. Clin Radiol 56:221–224
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dye, S.F. (2005). Knee Arthroplasty to Maximize the Envelope of Function. In: Bellemans, J., Ries, M.D., Victor, J.M. (eds) Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27658-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27658-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20242-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27658-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)