Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from Mobile-Bearing Knees

  • Chapter
  • 3182 Accesses

Summary

With the issues over the surgical treatment of the young osteoarthritic knee far from being resolved, the intellectual concepts associated with a mobile-bearing prosthesis are indeed attractive. The current challenges in knee prosthetic design are centered around attempting to produce normal kinematics, reducing wear and hence achieving greater longevity. Initially, it was hoped that mobile-bearing designs might go a long way toward achieving these aims. These hopes have yet to be borne out in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buechel FF Sr (2002) Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 404:40–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Murray DW, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Dorr LD (2001) Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 50:431–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2000) Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 82:705–711

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1995) The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:1713–1720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill GS, Joshi AB, Mills DM (1999) Total condylar knee arthroplasty: 16-to 21-year results. Clin Orthop 367:210–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J (1986) Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop 205:21–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1196–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang CH, Ho FY, Ma HM, Yang CT, Liau JJ, Kao HC, Young TH, Cheng CK (2002) Particle size and morphology of UHMWPE wear debris in failed total knee arthroplasties — a comparison between mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees. J Orthop Res 20:1038–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang CH, Ma HM, Liau JJ, Ho FY, Cheng CK (2002) Osteolysis in failed total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 8412:2224–2229

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA (2000) Tibiofemoral movement. 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1189–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones VC, Barton DC, Fitzpatrick DP, Auger DD, Stone MH, Fisher J (1999) An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 9:189–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jordan LR, Olivo JL, Voorhorst PE (1997) Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 338:119–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80:983–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, Kobayashi A, Sakamoto H, Freeman MA, Yamano Y (2000) Tibiofemoral movement. 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1199–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Price AJ et al (2003) A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rostoker W, Galante JO (1979) Contact pressure dependence of wear rates of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 13:957–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sathasivam S, Walker PS, Campbell PA, Rayner K (2001) The effect of contact area on wear in relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements. J Biomed Mater Res 58:282–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vertullo CJ, Easley ME, Scott WN, Insall JN (2001) Mobile bearings in primary knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9:355–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker PS, Sathasivam S (2000) Design forms of total knee replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 214:101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baré, J.V., Bourne, R.B. (2005). Lessons Learned from Mobile-Bearing Knees. In: Bellemans, J., Ries, M.D., Victor, J.M. (eds) Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27658-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27658-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20242-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27658-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics