Skip to main content

Considering Elevation Uncertainty for Managing Probable Disasters

  • Chapter
Book cover Geo-information for Disaster Management
  • 4143 Accesses

Abstract

The existence of elevation errors in the Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) usually is ignored, during spatial analysis of risk assessment and disaster management problems. As a result, conclusions are extracted, decisions are taken and actions are designed and executed, while the problem is examined on a wrong point of view. This paper describes the attempt to introduce a new model, the DEEM (Digital Elevation Error Model), which incorporates elevation uncertainty and accompanies a DEM uniquely. The use of an uncertain DEM, combined with a probabilistic “soft” decision approach, eliminates the risk of taking decisions that do not imply to the real problem’s basis. Research has shown deviations existing in results, up to 20–50% for volume measurements, area measurements, definition of boundaries, visibility calculation, etc., from those of a “hard” decision approach. The absence of an integrated GIS, able to manage data uncertainty, forces for by-pass approaches of the problem but not the appropriate ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achilleos G (2002a) Study of Errors in the Procedures of Digitizing Contour Lines and Generating Digital Elevation Models, PhD Thesis, Lab. of Geography & Spatial Analysis, School of Rural & Surveying Engineers, National Technical University of Athens, Athens (greek language).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1986) Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, Oxford University Press, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter JR (1988) Relative Errors Identified in USGS Gridded Models, Proceedings of Ninth International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography, Baltimore, Maryland, AUTOCARTO 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie NAC (1991) Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JC (1973) Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher PF (1993) Algorithm and Implementation Uncertainty in Viewshed Analysis, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher PF (1995) An Exploration of Probable Viewsheds in Landscape Planning, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 22, pp. 527–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (1992) Variation of the Accuracy of Digital Terrain Models with Sampling Intervals, Photogrammetric Record, 14(79), April 1992, pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (1993) Mathematical Models of the Accuracy of Digital Terrain Model Surfaces Linearly Constructed from Square Gridded Data, Photogrammetric Record, 14(82), pp. 661–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail E (1978) Panel Discussion: The Future of DTM (presented at the ASP DTM Symposium, May 9–11, 1978, St.Louis, MO), Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 44, No. 12, pp 1487–1497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostman A (1987) Accuracy Estimation of Digital Elevation Data Banks, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 425–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardus P (1973) The Precision of Contour Lines and Contour Intervals of Large-and Medium-Scale Maps, Photogrammetria, 29, pp.81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GJ (1994) The Accuracy of Digital Elevation Models Derived from Digitised Contour Data, Photogrammetric Record, 14(83), pp. 805–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulantzos G (2001) Fuzzy Logic in certain Location Problems, Journal of Hellenic Association of Rural & Surveying Engineers (greek language).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veis G, Agantza — Mbalodimou A (1989) Error Theory and Least Squares Methods, Semester Teaching Notes, School of Rural & Surveying Engineers, National Technical University of Athens, Athens (greek language).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzhong S, Ehlers M, Tempfli K (1994) Modeling and Visualizing Uncertainties in Multi-Data-Based Spatial Analysis, Proceedings of EGIS / MARI’ 94, Paris, pp. 454–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzhong S, Tempfli K (1994), Modelling Positional Uncertainty of Line Features in GIS, ASPRS/ACSM, Annual Convention & Exposition Technical Papers, Nevada, pp. 696–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoeli P (1984) Error-Bands of Topographical Contours with Computer and Plotter (Program Koppe), Geo-Processing, 2, pp. 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 8: 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Achilleos, G.A. (2005). Considering Elevation Uncertainty for Managing Probable Disasters. In: van Oosterom, P., Zlatanova, S., Fendel, E.M. (eds) Geo-information for Disaster Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27468-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics