Skip to main content

Influence of the Deformation Rate of Different Tests on Hot Cracking Formation

  • Chapter
Hot Cracking Phenomena in Welds

Abstract

Referring to the ISO standardization of hot cracking test procedures with externally loaded specimens, three different and fundamental test procedures are assessed with the help of experiments and finite element analyses to find out the influence of different deformation rates on the test results of three well known stainless steels.

A comparison is made between the hot tensile test carried out with help of the Gleeble system using the Moscow procedure of the Standard of Russian Federation, the American instructions for the Hot Ductility Curve as well as the PVR-test (controlled deformation crack test) created in Austria. These main test procedures have generally been used for more then 30 years.

While within the American Hot Ductility Curve Test a round tensile specimens is torn after heating by thermal resistance to a test temperature some degrees below liquation at a tension speed of about 50 mm/s, the Russian method heats all round tensile specimens to the same maximum temperature just above the melting point and loads each specimen at another tension speed between 0.01 and 0.1 mm/s for approximation of the critical tension speed.

For tensile test comparison, the PVR test is carried out on round specimens with a diameter of 10 mm. A TIG melt run is simultaneous welded longitudinally at a superposed tension speed linearly increasing from zero to 1 mm/s in welding direction. The length position of the first crack appearing at the specimen defines the critical tension speed.

Three different stainless steels have been subjected to these test procedures. The test results of the different procedures precisely correlate within the materials ranking, but differ in the amount of evaluated test criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Prokhorov NN (1962) The technological strength of metals while crystallisation during welding. Welding production Vol 9: No 4 April: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuda F, Hashimoto T, Senda T (1969) Fundamental investigation on solidification structure in weld metal. Trans Nat Res Inst Metals 11: 43–58

    Google Scholar 

  3. PrEN ISO 17641-1, Nov 2003. Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Hot cracking tests for weldments — Arc welding processes — Part 1: General (ISO/FDIS 17641-1:1003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. PrEN ISO 17641-2, Nov. 2003. Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Hot cracking tests for weldments — Arc welding processes — Part 2: Selfrestraint tests (ISO/FDIS 17641-2:1003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. prCEN ISO/TR 17641-3 Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Hot cracking tests for weldments — Arc welding processes — Part 3: Externally loaded tests (ISO/DTR 17641-3:1003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Japan Welding Society (1986) Hot cracking susceptibility evaluation of austenitic stainless steel weld materials. International Institute of Welding (Doc IIW IX-1395-86)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilken K (1999) Investigation to compare hot cracking tests — Externally loaded specimen. International Institute of Welding (Doc IIW IX-1945-99)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bystram MCT (1956) Some aspects of stainless alloy metallurgy and their application to welding problems. British Welding Journal. Febr: 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herold H, Streitenberger M, Pchennikov A (2001) Prevention of centreline solidification cracking during one side welding. International Institute of Welding (Doc IIW IX-2000-01 (and II-C-220-01)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herold H, Pchennikov A, Streitenberger M (2003) Current problems in hot cracking research described on the example of PVP test. Materials Science Forum 426–432: 4093–4098

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lundin CD, Lee CH, Menon R, Osorio V (1988) Weldability evaluations of modified 316 and 347 austenitic stainless steels: Part I — Preliminary Results. Welding Research Supplement 67 Febr.: 35-s–46-s

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folkhard E (1984) Metallurgie der Schweißung nichtrostender Stähle. Springer Verlag, Wien New York, p 153

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herold H, Streitenberger M, Pchennikov A (2001) Hot Cracking Theory by Prokhorov and Modelling of the PVR-test. Welding in the World 45,3/4: 17–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herold, H., Pchennikov, A., Streitenberger, M. (2005). Influence of the Deformation Rate of Different Tests on Hot Cracking Formation. In: Böllinghaus, T., Herold, H. (eds) Hot Cracking Phenomena in Welds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27460-X_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics