Abstract
Referring to the ISO standardization of hot cracking test procedures with externally loaded specimens, three different and fundamental test procedures are assessed with the help of experiments and finite element analyses to find out the influence of different deformation rates on the test results of three well known stainless steels.
A comparison is made between the hot tensile test carried out with help of the Gleeble system using the Moscow procedure of the Standard of Russian Federation, the American instructions for the Hot Ductility Curve as well as the PVR-test (controlled deformation crack test) created in Austria. These main test procedures have generally been used for more then 30 years.
While within the American Hot Ductility Curve Test a round tensile specimens is torn after heating by thermal resistance to a test temperature some degrees below liquation at a tension speed of about 50 mm/s, the Russian method heats all round tensile specimens to the same maximum temperature just above the melting point and loads each specimen at another tension speed between 0.01 and 0.1 mm/s for approximation of the critical tension speed.
For tensile test comparison, the PVR test is carried out on round specimens with a diameter of 10 mm. A TIG melt run is simultaneous welded longitudinally at a superposed tension speed linearly increasing from zero to 1 mm/s in welding direction. The length position of the first crack appearing at the specimen defines the critical tension speed.
Three different stainless steels have been subjected to these test procedures. The test results of the different procedures precisely correlate within the materials ranking, but differ in the amount of evaluated test criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Prokhorov NN (1962) The technological strength of metals while crystallisation during welding. Welding production Vol 9: No 4 April: 1–8
Matsuda F, Hashimoto T, Senda T (1969) Fundamental investigation on solidification structure in weld metal. Trans Nat Res Inst Metals 11: 43–58
PrEN ISO 17641-1, Nov 2003. Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Hot cracking tests for weldments — Arc welding processes — Part 1: General (ISO/FDIS 17641-1:1003)
PrEN ISO 17641-2, Nov. 2003. Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Hot cracking tests for weldments — Arc welding processes — Part 2: Selfrestraint tests (ISO/FDIS 17641-2:1003)
prCEN ISO/TR 17641-3 Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Hot cracking tests for weldments — Arc welding processes — Part 3: Externally loaded tests (ISO/DTR 17641-3:1003)
The Japan Welding Society (1986) Hot cracking susceptibility evaluation of austenitic stainless steel weld materials. International Institute of Welding (Doc IIW IX-1395-86)
Wilken K (1999) Investigation to compare hot cracking tests — Externally loaded specimen. International Institute of Welding (Doc IIW IX-1945-99)
Bystram MCT (1956) Some aspects of stainless alloy metallurgy and their application to welding problems. British Welding Journal. Febr: 41–46
Herold H, Streitenberger M, Pchennikov A (2001) Prevention of centreline solidification cracking during one side welding. International Institute of Welding (Doc IIW IX-2000-01 (and II-C-220-01)
Herold H, Pchennikov A, Streitenberger M (2003) Current problems in hot cracking research described on the example of PVP test. Materials Science Forum 426–432: 4093–4098
Lundin CD, Lee CH, Menon R, Osorio V (1988) Weldability evaluations of modified 316 and 347 austenitic stainless steels: Part I — Preliminary Results. Welding Research Supplement 67 Febr.: 35-s–46-s
Folkhard E (1984) Metallurgie der Schweißung nichtrostender Stähle. Springer Verlag, Wien New York, p 153
Herold H, Streitenberger M, Pchennikov A (2001) Hot Cracking Theory by Prokhorov and Modelling of the PVR-test. Welding in the World 45,3/4: 17–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herold, H., Pchennikov, A., Streitenberger, M. (2005). Influence of the Deformation Rate of Different Tests on Hot Cracking Formation. In: Böllinghaus, T., Herold, H. (eds) Hot Cracking Phenomena in Welds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27460-X_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27460-X_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22332-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27460-5
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)