Advertisement

Processing of Champ ACC and RSO Data in the Earth Gravity Field Determination

  • J. Luo
  • J. Sh. Ning
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 128)

Abstract

The high frequency accelerometer can provide non-gravitational perturbation force acceleration acting on CHAMP satellite. In CHAMP standard science product level-2 data, the acceleration, star camera, thruster firing and some corrections data are available. They play important roles in the determination of the earth gravity field. In this paper, the level-2 data (Day of year 1–100, 2002) are processed. Before applying the corrections, the curves of mean acceleration per day are very rough. After corrections, the curves show clear trend. On the other hand, the precise orbit of CHAMP is necessary for the determination of the earth gravity field. Now, the rapid science orbit data are provided by two organizations, GFZ and JPL. The data of a randomly chosen period (Day of year 267–269, 2002) from the two organizations are compared. The results of the comparison show that the difference between the two RSO data is notable, especially at the end part of orbit files. After getting rid of the end part of each file, there is no obvious system bias exists between the two RSO data and the magnitude of the difference keeps only about 0.1 m. Finally, some conclusions are drawn and some suggestions are given.

Keywords

CHAMP Accelerometer RSO 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bae S. and Schutz B. E., Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) Precision Attitude Determination, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 2001.2Google Scholar
  2. Cappellari J. O., Velez C. D. and Fuchs A. J., Mathematical Theory of Goddard Trajectory Determination System (N76-24291-24302), Goddard Space Flight Center, 1976.4Google Scholar
  3. Förste Ch., Format Description:The CHAMP Data Format. GFZ-Potsdam, 2002.3Google Scholar
  4. GFZ, Announcement of Opportunity for CHAMP. GFZ-Potsdam, 2001.5Google Scholar
  5. König R., Format Description:The CHAMP Orbit Format CHORB. GFZ-Potsdam, 2001.6Google Scholar
  6. McCarthy D., IERS Convention (1996). USA: U.S. Naval Observatory, 1996.7Google Scholar
  7. Schäfer Ch., The Sensitivity Analysis of GPS-tracked Satellite Missions (Case Study CHAMP): Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Stuttgart, 2000.10Google Scholar
  8. Schmidt R., Baustett G. König R. and Reigber Ch., Orbit Predictions for CHAMP — Development and Status. First CHAMP Science Meeting, GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany, Jan 22–25, 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Luo
    • 1
  • J. Sh. Ning
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Geodesy and GeomaticsWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Laboratory of Geospace Environment and GeodesyWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations