Advertisement

OASYS — Integrated Optimization of Landslide Alert Systems

  • H. Kahmen
  • W. Niemeier
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 128)

Abstract

In the past there has been a wide range of research work on landslides. However, most of this research has been carried out by a single discipline such as geology or geodesy. Therefore an international and interdisciplinary project was started. The proponents of the project, sponsored by the European Union, believe that a multidisciplinary integration of different methods has the greatest potential for substantial progress in natural hazards management. The goal of the project is the development of methods that allow: The detection of potential landslides, an efficient and continuous observation of critical areas, the derivation of real time information about actual risks.

This can be achieved by three steps:
  1. Detecting of potential landslides by large scale monitoring.

     
  2. Detecting of taking-off-domains by local scale monitoring.

     
  3. Impact and risk assessment and development for strategies for alert systems.

     

Keywords

Natural hazards landslides alert systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Almeida-Teixeira M.E., et al.(Eds.), 1991: Natural hazards and engineering geology. Prevention and control of landslides and other mass movements. Proceedings of the European School of Climatology and Natural Hazards course held in Lisbon from 28 March to 5 April 1990Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bhandari R. K., 1984: Simple and economical intrumentation and warning systems for landslides and other mass movements. State-of-the-art lecture, Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Landslides, Toronto, vol. 1, 251–273.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Carrara A., 1984: Landslide hazard mapping: aims and methods, Mouvements de terrain. Association Francaise de Geographic Physique. Colloque de Caen, p. 141–151.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cui Zhengquan, 1999: Geology and Geomechanics of the Three Gorges Projects. Bureau of Investigations & Survey, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, MWR, May 30 1999Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Einstein H. H., 1988: Landslide risk assessment procedure. Special lecture in Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on landslides, Lausanne, p. 1075–1090.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    “Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Field Measurements”, Conference at University of Florida, March 2001Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Haberler M., 2003 A fuzzy system for the assessment of landslide monitoring data, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessung & Geoinformation (VGI), 1/2003, ed. by H. Schuh, F. Brunner, and H. Kahmen, pp. 92–98.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Savvaidis P., Lakakis K., Zeimpekis A., 2001: Monitoring Ground Displacements at a National Highway Project: The Case of &quote;Egnatia Odos&quote; in Greece. Proceedings of IAG Workshop &quote;Monitoring of Constructions and Local Geodynamic Process&quote;, Wuhan University, China, 2001Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Spiker, E. C., Gori P. L., 2000: National Landslide Hazards Mitigation Strategy. Open-file Report 00-450, USGS.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Theilen-Willige, B., 1998: Seismic Hazard Localization based on Lineament Analysis of ERS-and SIR-C-Radar-Data of the Lake Constance Area and on Field Check.— European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, 25–27 May 1998 in Friedrichshafen, Proceedings, 447–550, VDE-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Kahmen
    • 1
  • W. Niemeier
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Department of Applied and Engineering GeodesyVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  2. 2.Institute of Geodesy and PhotogrammetryUniversity of Technology BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations