Advertisement

Hybrid Sensor System for Bridge Deformation Monitoring: Interfacing with Structural Engineers

  • Xiaolin Meng
  • Alan Dodson
  • Gethin Roberts
  • Emily Cosser
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 128)

Abstract

Analytical finite element (FE) modelling, modal testing and FE model updating are approaches which are employed to detect structural dynamic characteristics in the mechanical and aerospace engineering communities. Their application to civil engineering structures is more recent. To successfully apply these approaches, field data acquisition plays a very important role in validating and updating the analytical model.

As one of the feasible data collection tools for modal testing, GPS has been employed with other sensors by the IESSG at The University of Nottingham to monitor large structural deformations. While demonstrating promising advantages in positioning precision and flexibility in instrumentation installation, the requirements from the structural engineering perspective need to be well defined before this technology can be fully implemented.

In this paper prototypes of hybrid sensor systems coupled with a computational FE model are introduced. Data collected from a test bed bridge are processed and analysed to demonstrate the feasibility of proposed systems. The results reveal that it is possible to achieve 3D millimetre positioning precision for detecting high dynamic structural deformations, and obtaining a highly accurate FE model for the purpose of structural health monitoring (SHM).

Keywords

GPS Finite Element (FE) Model Structural Deformation Monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, J., C. Rizos, R. Warnant, X. Meng, E. Cosser, A.H. Dodson, G.W. Roberts (2003). The Monitoring of Bridge Movements using GPS and Pseudolites. In: Proc of 11th International Symposium on Deformation Measurements, International Federation Surveyors (FIG), Commission 6 — Engineering Surveys, Working Group 6.1, 25–28 May, Santorini, Greece.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, C.J., R. Karuna, V. Ashkenazi, G. Roberts, R.A. Evans (1999). Monitoring of Structures Using the Global Positioning System. In: Proc Instn Civ. Engrs Structs & Bldgs, February, pp. 97–105.Google Scholar
  3. Dai L., J. Wang, C. Rizos and S Han (2001). Pseudo-satellites Applications in Deformation Monitoring. GPS Solutions, 5(3), pp. 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dodson, A.H., X. Meng and G. Roberts (2001). Adaptive Method for Multipath Mitigation and Its Applications for Structural Deflection Monitoring. In: Proc of International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics and Navigation (KIS2001), Banff, Alberta, Canada, 5–8 June, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
  5. Elrod, B.D. and A.J.V. Dierendonck (1996). Pseudolite. In Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, edited by B.W. Parkinson, J.J. Spilker, P. Axelrad, and P. Enge, American Institute of Astronautics (AIAA), Inc., Washington, D.C., pp. 51–79.Google Scholar
  6. Fujino, Y., M. Murata, S. Okano, M. Takeguchi (2000). Monitoring System of the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge and Displacement Measurement Using GPS. In: Proc of Nondestructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities, and Pipelines IV, Proceedings of SPIE, edited by A.E. Aktan, and S.R. Gosselin, pp.229–235.Google Scholar
  7. Meng, X. (2002). Real-Time Deformation Monitoring of Bridges Using GPS/Accelerometers. PhD thesis, IESSG, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Meng, X., M. Meo, G.W. Roberts, A.H. Dodson, E. Cosser, E. Luliano, A. Morris (2003a). Validating GPS Based Bridge Deformation Monitoring with Finite Element Model. In: Proc of GNSS 2003, The European Navigation Conference, 22–25 April, Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
  9. Meng, X., G.W. Roberts, E. Cosser, A.H. Dodson, J. Barnes, C. Rizos (2003b). Real-time Bridge Deflection and Vibration Monitoring Using an Integrated GPS/Accelerometer/Pseudolite System. In: Proc of 11th International Symposium on Deformation Measurements, International Federation Surveyors (FIG), Commission 6 — Engineering Surveys, Working Group 6.1, 25–28 May, Santorini, Greece.Google Scholar
  10. Roberts, G.W., A.H. Dodson, and V. Ashkenazi (1999). Twist and Deflection: Monitoring Motion of Humber Bridge, GPS World, 10(10), pp. 24–34.Google Scholar
  11. Roberts, G.W., A.H. Dodson, C.J. Brown, R. Karuna, E. Evans (2000a). Monitoring the Height Deflections of the Humber Bridge by GPS, GLONASS and Finite Element Modelling. In Proc of IAG Symposia Geodesy Beyond 2000, edited by Schwarz, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 355–360.Google Scholar
  12. Roberts, G.W., X. Meng, C.J. Brown (2000b). The Use of GPS for the Measurement of Bridge Movements: A Viability Study. The University of Nottingham and Brunel University.Google Scholar
  13. Roberts, G.W., X. Meng, A.H. Dodson (2001). Data Processing and Multipath Mitigation for GPS/Accelerometer Based Hybrid Structural Deflection Monitoring System. In: Proc of ION GPS 2001, 14th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Sat. Div. of the U.S. Inst. of Navigation, 11–14 September, Salt Lake City, USA, pp. 473–481.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaolin Meng
    • 1
  • Alan Dodson
    • 1
  • Gethin Roberts
    • 1
  • Emily Cosser
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Surveying and Space Geodesy (IESSG)The University of NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations