Skip to main content

Volatility and Job Creation in the Knowledge Economy

  • Chapter
Book cover Essays in Dynamic General Equilibrium Theory

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Theory ((ECON.THEORY,volume 20))

Summary

Sectors with increasing returns to scale have been shown to amplify business cycles exhibiting more volatility than others [13]. Our hypothesis is that this volatility could be a cause of the “jobless recovery” suggesting policies for employment generation. To test this hypothesis we introduce a general equilibrium model with involuntary unemployment. The economy has two sectors: one with increasing returns that are external to the firm and endogenously determined — the knowledge sector — and the other with constant returns to scale. We define a measure of employment volatility, a ‘labor beta’ that is a relative of the ‘beta’ used in finance. A ‘resolving’ equation is derived from which it is proved that increasing return sectors exhibit more employment volatility then other sectors. The theoretical results are validated on US macro economic data of employment by industry (2–3 digits SIC codes) of the 1947–2001 period, showing that the highest ‘labor betas’ are in the service sectors with increasing returns to scale. Policy conclusions are provided to solve the puzzle of the ‘jobless recovery’, where small firms in the services industry play a key role. We conclude with policy recommendations on how to create jobs in the knowledge economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Werner Antweiler; Daniel Trefler, “Increasing Returns and All That: A View From Trade”. NBER Working Papers #7941, Oct. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kenneth Arrow, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”. Review of Economic Studies, 1962, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Susanto Basu; John G. Fernald, “Aggregate Productivity and the Productivity of Aggregates”. NBER Working Papers #5382, Dec. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Susanto Basu; John G. Fernald, “Returns to Scale in U.S. Production: Estimates and Implications”. The Journal of Political Economy, Apr., 1997, Vol. 105, No. 2., pp. 249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elise S. Brezis; Paul R. Krugman; Daniel Tsiddon, “Leapfrogging in International Competition: A Theory of Cycles in National Technological Leadership”. The American Economic Review, Dec., 1993, Vol. 83, No. 5., pp. 1211–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craig Burnside, “Production Function Regressions, Returns to Scale, and Externalities”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1996, Vol. 37, pp. 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Cass and Herakles Polemarchakis, “Convexity and Sunspots: A Remark”, Journal of Economic Theory, Dec. 1990, Vol. 52, pp. 433–439.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Census Bureau, “County Business Patterns Survey”, provided by Virginia University at http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/collections/stats/cbp/

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graciela Chichilnisky, “Traditional Comparative Advantages vs. Economies of Scale: NAFTA and GATT”. Rivista Di Politica Economica, Apr. 1993, pp. 161–197.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graciela Chichilnisky, “Traditional Comparative Advantage vs. Increasing Returns to Scale: NAFTA and the GATT,” International Problems of Economic Interdependence, New York, 1994 (eds. Baldassarri, M., Di Matteo, M., and Mundell R.), St. Martin’s Press Inc., pp. 161–197.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graciela Chichilnisky, “Trade Regimes and GATT: Resource Intensive vs. Knowledge Intensive growth” Chapter 10 in Levi-Livermore, A. (ed.) Handbook on the Globalization of the World Economy, Chapter 10, pp. 226–249, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK. Northhampton, Mausa, 1998, pp. 147-181.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graciela Chichilnisky, “The Job Creating Machine.”, Columbia University memo.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graciela Chichilnisky and Olga Gorbachev, “Volatility in the Knowledge Economy”, Economic Theory, Sept. 2004 (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graciela Chichilnisky and Geoffrey Heal, The Evolving International Economy. Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Graciela Chichilnisky, A. Beltratti, and Geoffrey M. Heal, “Sustainable Use of Renewable Resources,” (with A. Beltratti and G.M. Heal), Chapter 2.1, Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty. (G. Chichilnisky, G.M. Heal, and A. Vercelli, eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1998, pp. 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  16. John S. Chipman, “External Economies of Scale and Competitive Equilibrium”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Aug. 1970, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 347–385.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Federal Reserve Board of Governors, “Statistical Release. E.2 Survey of Terms of Business Lending: 1. Commercial and industrial loans made by all commercial banks”, 1997–2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Erica L Groshen and Simon Potter, “Has Structural Change Contributed to a Jobless Recovery?” Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Vol. 9, No. 8, Aug. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Geoffrey M. Heal, ed., The Economics of Increasing Returns. Edward Elgar, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Geoffrey M. Heal, “Macrodynamics and Returns to Scale”. The Economic Journal, Mar. 1986, Vol. 96, Is. 381, pp. 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dale W. Jorgenson, “Productivity and Postwar U.S. Economic Growth”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 2, Iss.4, (Autumn, 1988), pp. 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dale W. Jorgenson, Mun S. Ho, and Kevin J. Stiroh, “Projecting Productivity Growth: Lessons from the U.S. Growth Resurgence”. Economic Review, 2002, Iss.Q3, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paul Krugman, “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade”. The American Economic Review, Dec., 1980, Vol. 70, No. 5., pp. 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paul Krugman, “Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade”. The Journal of Political Economy, Oct., 1981, Vol. 89, No. 5., pp. 959–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Paul Krugman, “New Theories of Trade Among Industrial Countries (in International Trade)”. The American Economic Review, May, 1983, Vol. 73, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. pp. 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paul Krugman, “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography”. The Journal of Political Economy, Jun. 1991, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Arvind Panagariya, “Variable Returns to Scale in Production and Patterns of Specialization”. The American Economic Review, Mar. 1981, Vol. 71, Is. 1, pp. 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Catherine J. Morrison Paul and Donald S. Siegel, “Scale Economies and Industry Agglomeration Externalities: A Dynamic Cost Function Approach”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No.1, (Mar. 1999), pp. 272–290.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luis A. Rivera-Batiz, Paul Romer, “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1991, Vol. 106, Is. 2, pp. 531–555.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paul Romer, “Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth”. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 1002–1037.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé, “Endogenous Business Cycles and the Dynamics of Output, Hours, and Consumption”. The American Economic Review, Dec. 2000, Vol. 90, No. 5, pp. 1136–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carl Shapiro, Joseph E. Stiglitz, “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device”, The American Economic Review 74, Is.3, June 1984, pp. 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jerome Stein, The Economics of Future Markets, 1987, New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  34. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis: Survey of Current Business, May 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis: Survey of Current Business, Nov. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis: Survey of Current Business, “Improved Estimates of Gross Product by Industry for 1947–1998”, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  37. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, “News Release: Gross Domestic Product and Corporate Profits”, March 25, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  38. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis: Survey of Current Business, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  39. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://data.bls.gov/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet.

    Google Scholar 

  40. U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy “Small Business by the Numbers”, www.sba.gov/advo/ December 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  41. U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, “US Small Business Indicators,” 1995–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  42. U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, “Financing Patterns of Small Firms: Findings from the 1998 Survey of Small Business Finance.”, Sept. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Venture One, “Annual financing survey by Venture One of San Francisco,” web at www.ventureone.com.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chichilnisky, G., Gorbachev, O. (2005). Volatility and Job Creation in the Knowledge Economy. In: Citanna, A., Donaldson, J., Polemarchakis, H., Siconolfi, P., Spear, S.E. (eds) Essays in Dynamic General Equilibrium Theory. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27192-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics