Skip to main content

The Designation of National Parks in German Nature Conservation Law

  • Chapter
Valuation and Conservation of Biodiversity
  • 1097 Accesses

Summary

The declaration of rural areas which are valuable in an nature conservative context to national parks has been an important instrument for the protection of nature for a long time. Originated in the USA, the national park model has spread across the entire world. However, the same environmental circumstances as those existing in the USA do not predominate everywhere. Consequently, the US-American concept is not appropriate for many countries.

In the meantime fifteen national parks have also been established in Germany. In this context, the legal prerequisites for the designation of national parks in Germany are not always undisputed. Above all, the fact that Germany, as a densely settled country, no longer has the requisite extensive and pristine natural landscape causes problems. This contentious question culminated in the court case of the Elbtalaue National Park, which had already been established, with the result that the declaration of protection was rescinded. This problem is symptomatical for other national parks in Germany, e.g. the Unteres Odertal National Park, the German investigative area of the DFG Graduate Training Programme. As a consequence of this, the German federal legislators have eased the legal prerequisites for the establishment of national parks. To begin with, this contribution presents the currently valid preconditions for the designation of national parks in Germany.

Since the concept of national parks has meanwhile become established world-wide, standards for national parks have been developed on an international level. As an integral contribution within its sphere of competence, the IUCN's World Commission on Protected Areas promotes the establishment and the effective management of a world-wide representative network of protected areas. In the course of this task the IUCN worked out a definition and criteria for the national park protection category in good time and ratified a resolution on them at its 10th General Assembly in 1969. The Federal Republic of Germany, as an IUCN contract state, is bound by this resolution. As a consequence, the question as to whether the new statutory regulation still conforms to these international requirements will be positively answered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnberger A, Brandenburg C (2001) Der Nationalpark als Wohnumfeld und Naherholungsgebiet. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 33:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender B, Sparwasser R, Engel R (2000) Umweltrecht, 4th ed. Müller, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum P, Agena CA, Franke J (1996) Niedersächsisches Naturschutzgesetz, Kommentar, Loseblattsammlung, Kommunal-und Schulverlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Boye P, Bauer HG (2000) Vorschlag zur Prioritätenfindung im Artenschutz mittels Roter Listen sowie unter arealkundlichen und rechtlichen Aspekten am Beispiel der Brutvögel und Säugetiere Deutschlands. In: Binot-Hafke, Gruttke, Ludwig, Riecken (eds) Bundesweite Rote Listen — Bilanzen, Konsequenzen, Perspektiven. Bonn-Bad Godesberg, pp 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROPARC and IUCN (2000) Richtlinien für Managementkategorien von Schutzgebieten — Interpretation und Anwendung der Management Kategorien in Europa, 2nd ed, Grafenau

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisahn A (1999) Annotation to higher administrative court of Lueneburg, judgement from February 22nd 1999. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 10:158–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs W (1999) Naturschutz im Abseits. Natur und Recht 21:446–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Föderation der Natur-und Nationalparke Europas, Sektion Deutschland e.V. (FÖNAD) (1997) Studie über bestehende und potentielle Nationalparks in Deutschland. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassner E (1995) Das Recht der Landschaft. Neumann, Radebeul

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassner E, Bendomir-Kahlo G, Schmidt-Räntsch A, Schmidt-Räntsch J (2003) Bundesnaturschutzgesetz, Kommentar, 2nd ed. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassner E, Bendomir-Kahlo G, Schmidt-Räntsch A, Schmidt-Räntsch J (1996) Bundesnaturschutzgesetz, Kommentar, 1st ed. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellermann M (2001) Natura 2000, 2nd ed. Blackwell, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Harthun M (1999) Aktuelle Entwicklungen zum geplanten Nationalpark Kellerwald nach dem Regierungswechsel in Hessen: Nationales Naturerbe oder Wirtschaftsforst? Jahrbuch Naturschutz in Hessen 4:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (1996) Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. Gland and Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepfer M (1998) Umweltrecht, 2nd ed. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Knake M (2000) Ein Großschutzgebiet wird demontiert. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 32:281–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodziejcok K (2000) Nationalparke am Wendepunkt? Natur und Recht 22:251–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang A (1984) Welchen Anforderungen muß ein Nationalpark in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland genügen? Natur und Recht 6:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Meßerschmidt K (2001) Wiedervorlage oder Innovation? Zum Entwurf einer Gesamtnovellierung des Bundesnaturschutzgesetzes vom 2. Februar 2001. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 12:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Oebbecke J (2001) »Nationalpark« Industriekultur Ruhrgebiet? Natur und Recht 23:142–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (1995) Naturschutzbiologie. Spektrum, Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecken U (2002) Novellierung des Bundesnaturschutzgesetzes: Gesetzlich geschützte Biotope nach § 30. Natur und Landschaft 77:397–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader C, Hellenbroich T (2002) Annotation to administrative court of Schleswig, judgement from October 10th 2001–12 B 10/01. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 13:215–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich R (1972) Notwendigkeit und Inhalt eines modernen Naturschutz-und Landschaftspflegerechts: Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 87:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock M (2000) Nationalparke in Deutschland: Den Entwicklungsgedanken gesetzlich absichern und konkretisieren! Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 11:198–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens H (2001) Gibt es weiterhin Nationalparke in Deutschland? Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 33:358–360

    Google Scholar 

  • World Conservation Monitoring Centre and IUCN World Commission for Protected Areas (2003) 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas. Thanet, Gland and Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi H (2002) Wildnis als Kulturaufgabe — ein Diskussionsbeitrag. Natur und Landschaft 77:373–378

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hellenbroich, T. (2005). The Designation of National Parks in German Nature Conservation Law. In: Valuation and Conservation of Biodiversity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27138-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics