Skip to main content

Calculating Incentives for Watershed Protection. A Case Study In Guatemala

  • Chapter

Summary

The research is conducted in the River Basin Mestelá (Macizo de Cobán, Alta Verapaz — Guatemala), where the principal causes of threat of the biological diversity are the expansion of the exploited surfaces for agriculture and the prevalence of crops with a high dange The integration of strategies that promote watershed protection into peasants' production systems is typically associated with increased costs at the farm-household level. Against this background, the paper deals on one hand with the quantification of these costs, and on the other hand with the possibilities to compensate the peasants for these costs by introducing the policy instrument of payment for environmental services (PES). The paper focuses on payments for water supply, which is increased by environmentally friendly farming techniques that also aim to protect biodiversity. A linear programming model, which is based on empirical household data, will be used to calculate the income of farm households that differ with regard to the environmental services they generate. The income losses experienced by the farmer as a consequence of adopting systems, which provide more environmental services, will be the guideline for determining the amount of the compensation. Through the creation of different scenarios that reflect different payment schemes for environmental services and varying frame conditions, the paper shows whether the application of the PES instrument is feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achard F, Eva H, Glinni A, Mayaux P, Richards T, Stibig HJ (1998) Identification of Deforestation Hot Spot Areas in the Humid Tropics. TREES Publication Series B No.4, European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Dillon JL, Hardaker JB (1977) Agricultural Decision Analysis. Iowa State University Press, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Aylward et al. (1995) Economic Incentives for Watershed Protection: A Report on an Ongoing Study of Arenal, Costa Rica. CREED Working Paper Series No 3. The International Institute for Environment and Development, London and the Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier B, Bergeron G (2001) Natural Resource Management in the Hillsides of Honduras. Bioeconomic Modelling at the Micro watershed Level. Research Report, IFPRI, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger HP (1986) Attitudes toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India. In: American Journal of Development Studies 20: 5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes W, Wörmann E (1970) Landwirtschaftliche Betriebslehre. Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley DW, Larson BA (1990) Property Rights, Externalities, and Resource Degradation. In: Journal of Development Economics 33: 235–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Schreckenberg K (1998) Shifting Cultivators as Agents of Deforestation: Assessing the Evidence. In: Natural Resource Perspective Number 29, April 1998, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinjzeel (1990) Hydrology of Moist Tropical Forests and Effects of Conversion: A State of Knowledge Review. UNESCO IHP, Humide Tropics Programme, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson GA, Zilberman D, Miranowski JA (1993) Agricultural and Environmental Resource Economics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciesla WM (1995) Climate change, forests and forest management: an overview, FAO Forestry Paper 126, Forest Resources Division, FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark KL, Lawton RO, Butler PR (2000) The Physical Environment. In: Nalini MN, Nathaniel T (eds) Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayanov AV (1986) Theory of Peasants Economy. Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomitz (1999) Financing environmental services: The Costa Rican experience and its implications. In: Science of the Total Environment 240: 157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent JB, Harrison SR, Woodford KB (1986) Farm planning with linear programming: concept and practice. Butterworths, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (1988) Peasant Economics. Farm Households and Agrarian Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1992) Maize in Human Nutrition. Food and Nutrition Series No. 25. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber W (2000) Plants and Vegetation. In: Nalini M. Nadkarni and Nathaniel T. Monteverde: Ecology and Conservation of a Cloud Forest. Oxford University Press. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell PBR, Norton RD (1986) Mathematical Programming for Economich Analysis of Agriculture. MacMillan Publishers. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearne R (1996) Economic valuation of use and non-use values of environmental goods and services in developing countries. Project Appraisal 11(4): 255–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolom-Morales (1997) Caracterización de la Actividad de CacerÍa en la Reserva de la Biósfera Sierra de las Minas y Diseño de un Plan de Monitoreo. Fundación Defensores de la Naturaleza. Guatemala

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaphake A, Scheumann W, Schliep R (2001) Biodivesity and International Water Policy. International Agreements and Experiences Related to the Protection of Freshwater Ecosystems. Research Report commissioned by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Malavasi EO, Kellenberg J (2002) Program of Payments for Ecological Services in Costa Rica. Paper presented on the International Expert Meeting on Forest Landscape Restoration in Heredia, Costa Rica

    Google Scholar 

  • Máñez Costa (2003) Strategien und Optionen für den Natur-und Umweltschutz in agrarischen Produktionssysteme — Ein Fallbeispiel aus Guatemala. BfN, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers N (1992) The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future. Norton Publishers. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlay GI, Falção M, Nhantumbo I, Kowero G (2003) Policy impact on woodland resource management, use and conservation in Mozambique: Case study of selected sites in Dondo. Nhamatanda. Gondola and Manica District. In: Kowero G, Campbell BM, Sumaila R (eds) Policies and governance structures in woodlans of Southern Africa. CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasi et al. (2002) Forest Ecosystem Services: can they pay our way out of deforestation. GEF. San José. Costa Rica

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz Malavasi E, Kellenberg J (1999) Program of Payments For Ecological Services in Costa Rica. Costa Rica — United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Panell D (1997) Introduction to practical linear programming. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Secaira E (2000) La Conservación de la Naturaleza, el Pueblo y Movimiento Maya, y la Espiritualidad en Guatemala: Implicaciones para Conservacionistas. Proarca — Capas. Guatemala

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Squire L, Strauss J (1986) Agricultural Household Models. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore. USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw B, Holden ST (1997) A farm household analysis of resource use and conservation decisions of smallholders: an application to highland farmers in ethiopia. Discussion Paper No D-03/1997. University of Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorner D (1986) Chayanov and The Theory of Peasants Economy. Madison University Press, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • von Urff W (1964) Productionsplanung in der Landwirtschaft. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Methode des Linear Programming. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosti S, Reardon T (1992) Agricultural Development, Sustainability, and Alleviating Poverty: The Critical Triangle. IFPRI, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Máñez Costa, M.A., Zeller, M. (2005). Calculating Incentives for Watershed Protection. A Case Study In Guatemala. In: Valuation and Conservation of Biodiversity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27138-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics